 |
|
06-30-2010, 02:18 PM
|
#1
|
|
Veteran
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 9,908
|
Elin Nordegren Gets $750M, Custody of Kids in Exchange for Silence
http://www.foxnews.com/entertainment...ce/?test=faces
Excerpt:
Tiger Woods is banned from letting girlfriends near his kids in a divorce deal netting his ex a record $750 million settlement, The Sun reported Wednesday.
The golfer agreed to keep single women away from daughter Sam, three, and son Charlie, one.
He can bring a new flame into their lives only if he marries her. In return, former wife Elin Nordegren ,30, gets the biggest payout ever seen in a celebrity divorce.
|
|
|
|
06-30-2010, 03:06 PM
|
#2
|
|
The Voice of Reason!
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Canandaigua, New york
Posts: 112,889
|
Her first "Masters."
__________________
Who does the Racing Form Detective like in this one?
|
|
|
|
|
06-30-2010, 03:55 PM
|
#3
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 1,336
|
I have an extra bedroom Tiger can rent until he gets back on his feet. Rent will be very cheap 1% of his income each month. Will have a midnight curfew of course.
|
|
|
|
|
06-30-2010, 05:36 PM
|
#4
|
|
Veteran
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 1,946
|
No matter which way you cut it, that's some mighty expensive Poon-Tang. 
|
|
|
|
|
06-30-2010, 05:53 PM
|
#5
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 3,630
|
that lady had to be so embarrassed by his behavior behind her back.
__________________
Check out my daily horse racing podcast The BARN at www.betamerica.com/barn
|
|
|
|
|
06-30-2010, 05:59 PM
|
#6
|
|
In Front
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Hollywood Florida
Posts: 2,735
|
750 million...WOW..Wonder how it feels to write a check that big!!
|
|
|
|
|
06-30-2010, 06:07 PM
|
#7
|
|
Just another Facist
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Now in Houston
Posts: 52,822
|
I didn't think he had that much money
__________________
WE ARE THE DUMBEST COUNTRY ON THE PLANET!
|
|
|
|
|
06-30-2010, 06:09 PM
|
#8
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 25
|
I was wondering, does he have to pay child support?
|
|
|
|
|
06-30-2010, 06:54 PM
|
#9
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 8,429
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Pell Mell
No matter which way you cut it, that's some mighty expensive Poon-Tang. |
yep, if we estimate that in his time with her, that they had sex 500 times, that comes to $1.5 million per pop.
|
|
|
|
|
06-30-2010, 09:02 PM
|
#10
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 89
|
$750 million for his ex
$10 million for Rachel Uchitel
Quote:
TMZ has learned the actual settlement could fluctuate $1 million either way, depending on future circumstances. But the baseline is $10 mil.
Compare Rachel's settlement with what other A.M's received, if they got anything at all. We're told several mistresses got several hundred thousand dollars, and others got nothing. That speaks volumes about how much Rachel knows.
|
http://www.tmz.com/2010/04/01/tiger-...payout-prenup/
IMO the only way he pays this much money is if these women can allege or prove he used PEDs. What could they possibly say to hurt his image any further concerning non golf behavior? If he used PEDs, he'll never challenge Nicklaus as best golfer ever no matter how many majors he might win.
|
|
|
|
|
06-30-2010, 09:33 PM
|
#11
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: May 2010
Location: 6 Acres of Peace Not Too Far From Pimlico
Posts: 167
|
I don't follow golf and it goes without having to say that I know who Tiger Woods is. What an idiot he turned out to be. He's a joke now. It's a shame.
__________________
http://www.midatlantichorserescue.org/
|
|
|
|
|
06-30-2010, 09:50 PM
|
#12
|
|
The Voice of Reason!
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Canandaigua, New york
Posts: 112,889
|
Could have been worse...she could have gotten custody of his balls.
__________________
Who does the Racing Form Detective like in this one?
|
|
|
|
|
06-30-2010, 09:52 PM
|
#13
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: May 2010
Location: 6 Acres of Peace Not Too Far From Pimlico
Posts: 167
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Tom
Could have been worse...she could have gotten custody of his balls.
|
Not sure he would have any left after all of this mess he created.
__________________
http://www.midatlantichorserescue.org/
|
|
|
|
|
07-01-2010, 12:04 AM
|
#14
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 46,884
|
This is the perfect topic to ask all the more libertarian-minded conservatives on this forum (and you all know who you are  ) a serious question about this huge settlement, its fairness and even the grounds for this divorce. So, let's begin with this latter, since it's kinda fundamental to the consequences Tiger is suffering.
The grounds, of course, is a little ol' item called [b]adultery[/i]. But isn't adultery a little quaint? An old fashioned idea? So...18th centurish? For that matter -- even more antiquated since it finds its roots, apparently, in the bible -- of all places. Aren't there any libertarian types out there who think adultery has somewhat outlived its usefulness? Isn't adultery so....yesteryear? And doesn't libertarian ideology at its very core subscribe to the "live and let live" motto? Isn't this motto Tom was alluding to implicitly when he wrote on another topic:
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Tom
Sex
Drugs
Gambling
Alcohol
People want it, you will never stop it. Stop wasting time and money trying to.
|
The argument goes: People who "want" these things aren't really hurting anyone else. So society should just give people what they want. Yet, oddly, I don't hear any of you with a libertarian bent lamenting over how unfair and unjust this all is to Tiger. After all, wasn't he just having some sex? So what it was outside of wedlock! Lots of people have extramarital sex. This is what people do. This is what people want. Why should Tiger be punished for just being a normal, healthy human being who happens to have a little stronger strong sex drive than, perhaps, some other men? Isn't having sex with virtually anyone as natural as brushing your teeth in the morning? I mean...according to so many "open-minded, broad-minded, educated, enlightened" types, having same sex sex is not only okay, but that, too, is even considered today to be a natural act. What is the big deal, therefore, about adultery? Aren't all these punitive damages a huge waste of time and money on society? Aren't they grossly unjust? Shouldn't all adultery laws be repealed now that we're in the 21st Century?
What sayest thou, you libertarians? 
Boxcar
__________________
Consistent profits can only be made on the basis of analysis that is far from obvious to the majority. - anonymous guru
|
|
|
|
|
07-01-2010, 12:16 AM
|
#15
|
|
C'est Tout
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Cajunland
Posts: 13,273
|
Boxcar
That conversation you just had with yourself was hilarious...and quite revealing of your nature. Pick a topic, ANY topic, and Box will find a way to turn it into a Con vs Lib argument (or at least try to)...
Remember that perfect game that the ump messed up a few weeks back? Gee Box, was that a liberal umpire??? Hmmmm??? Below is some room for you discuss the topic with yourself. Have fun:
Now, don't you feel better for having put us all in our place and tellin us what's up?? 
__________________
How do I work this?
-David Byrne
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|
