 |
|
04-05-2010, 09:15 PM
|
#1
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 3,034
|
Ice caps growing
|
|
|
|
04-05-2010, 09:21 PM
|
#2
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 46,884
|
That's all caused by Bush and his man-made global warming machine.
Boxcar
__________________
Consistent profits can only be made on the basis of analysis that is far from obvious to the majority. - anonymous guru
|
|
|
|
|
04-05-2010, 10:46 PM
|
#3
|
|
Veteran
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 11,435
|
Man, Where Yew Bin ?
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by tzipi
|
Didn't you hear ? The debate is ...
over !!!
|
|
|
|
|
04-05-2010, 11:14 PM
|
#4
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 3,034
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by toetoe
Didn't you hear ? The debate is ...
over !!!
|
Nope, didn't hear. Just found those articles interesting.
|
|
|
|
|
04-06-2010, 02:20 PM
|
#5
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: May 2004
Location: New Hampshire
Posts: 14,487
|
The Earth crust and plates will continue to do what has been going on over and over, the democrats will try to tax you for over and over. Several times this earth has had devastating and climatic events that wiped out a majority of species, only to have new life form again. If our days are numbered it will be because of some stupid republican or democrat, but maybe a really neat way of balancing the budget or wiping out the money we owe.
|
|
|
|
|
04-06-2010, 02:58 PM
|
#6
|
|
velocitician
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 26,301
|
National Geographic is just a million tads more reputable and no where are they finding the same long range occurrence.
http://news.nationalgeographic.com/n...orth_pole.html
__________________
"If this world is all about winners, what's for the losers?" Jr. Bonner: "Well somebody's got to hold the horses Ace."
|
|
|
|
|
04-06-2010, 03:04 PM
|
#7
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Bird Rock
Posts: 16,697
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by 46zilzal
|
 
Your bits are becoming entertaining as Henny Youngman.
|
|
|
|
|
04-06-2010, 03:13 PM
|
#8
|
|
Just Deplorable
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Lebanon, Ohio
Posts: 8,072
|
Polar Bear is back on the menu! 
|
|
|
|
|
04-06-2010, 03:13 PM
|
#9
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 8,429
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by fast4522
The Earth crust and plates will continue to do what has been going on over and over, the democrats will try to tax you for over and over.
|
bingo, thats all this ever was, an elaborate justification for massive new taxes.
|
|
|
|
|
04-06-2010, 03:19 PM
|
#10
|
|
velocitician
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 26,301
|
typical as one can read all about it yet the scientific community keeps finding the same data.
http://www.waronscience.com/excerpt.php
__________________
"If this world is all about winners, what's for the losers?" Jr. Bonner: "Well somebody's got to hold the horses Ace."
|
|
|
|
|
04-06-2010, 05:14 PM
|
#11
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 2,960
|
Perhaps the glaciers were too thick to start with.
|
|
|
|
|
04-06-2010, 05:26 PM
|
#12
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: May 2004
Location: New Hampshire
Posts: 14,487
|
I doubt that, just Zillys thick head.
|
|
|
|
|
04-07-2010, 10:51 AM
|
#13
|
|
velocitician
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 26,301
|
The US Geological Survey, and organization out in the field actually testing markers has many scientific papers to support their position.
Take your pick.
http://www.usgs.gov/global_change/fact_sheets.asp
__________________
"If this world is all about winners, what's for the losers?" Jr. Bonner: "Well somebody's got to hold the horses Ace."
|
|
|
|
|
04-07-2010, 11:22 AM
|
#14
|
|
The Voice of Reason!
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Canandaigua, New york
Posts: 112,887
|
46, what is the correct thickness of the ice caps?
If you and science claim they are getting too thin, what is your standard for thickness, and why is that optimal? Surely science cannot make claims of extremes without standards of norm.
__________________
Who does the Racing Form Detective like in this one?
|
|
|
|
04-07-2010, 11:33 AM
|
#15
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 46,884
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Tom
46, what is the correct thickness of the ice caps?
If you and science claim they are getting too thin, what is your standard for thickness, and why is that optimal? Surely science cannot make claims of extremes without standards of norm.
|
We've been down this road before when we tried to learn what scientists believe the ideal global temperature is, since the earth is supposedly too warm. (Too warm compared to what for those of you whose heads are stuck in the sand.) I suspect we'll get the same response this time around. 
Boxcar
__________________
Consistent profits can only be made on the basis of analysis that is far from obvious to the majority. - anonymous guru
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|
