Horse Racing Forum - PaceAdvantage.Com - Horse Racing Message Board

Go Back   Horse Racing Forum - PaceAdvantage.Com - Horse Racing Message Board > Thoroughbred Horse Racing Discussion > General Handicapping Discussion


Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
Old 11-08-2009, 12:29 AM   #1
Turfday
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Westwood/Century City CA
Posts: 588
AGAIN!...Equidaily's "Bombs Away" Report...Bet $4,500 Return $8,020

http://www.equidaily.com/bestbet/opi...007/71026.html

Once again, from the report posted on Equidaily's website in 2007:

Simply WIN betting blindly on all Breeder's Cup entrants at 20/1 or higher.

On Friday and Saturday, there were combined 45 Breeder's Cup entrants that went off at 20/1 or higher.

Example of betting $100 to win on all of them:

There were win payoffs of $52.60, $63.20 and $44.60.

BET $4,500

RETURN $8,020

PROFIT $3,520
__________________
Here's to fast horses & big mutuels,

Bob Selvin

http://nationalturf.com
Turfday is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 11-08-2009, 12:53 AM   #2
cmoore
Registered User
 
cmoore's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 8,077
Twinspire profit line over lays at 10-1 or higher did pretty good...Fourteen plays. Two winners.

Race 4).....$52.60....Profit Line odds were 12-1..

Race 5).....$63.20...Profit Line odds were 19-1

This is in the tool tab on the odds board..The over lays are in red..

Last edited by cmoore; 11-08-2009 at 12:55 AM.
cmoore is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 11-08-2009, 07:51 AM   #3
Donnie
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: over at HTR
Posts: 851
Quote:
Once again, from the report posted on Equidaily's website in 2007:
...wondering how that approach did in 2008...??
Donnie is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 11-09-2009, 11:52 AM   #4
Linny
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 429
Seth mentioned to me on Saturday that he didn't do the report for last year because he wasn't sure how "true" the odds were, but that he would in fact revisit 2008.
Linny is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 11-09-2009, 06:44 PM   #5
cj
@TimeformUSfigs
 
cj's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Moore, OK
Posts: 46,828
In 2008 there was one $75 winner.

I have no idea what he means by "true" odds, but I went by the results charts.

There were 51 horses that went off 20 to 1 or more.

$5100 bet
$3750 returned

$1350 lost
cj is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 11-10-2009, 01:03 AM   #6
WinterTriangle
Registered User
 
WinterTriangle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 3,653
so over 2 years it would have been a $2,170 profit for wagering $9,600.

Not for me.

When I get in the mood to blow money blindly, (which I don't) I'd do a search, on a rainy day, of all horses with the word storm, stormy, slop, etc. in their names. Another day, I'd do all horses with word gold, golden, goldie, etc.

Done it on paper, made a profit both times.

$9600 is too rich to "dispense with handicapping" for me, though.
WinterTriangle is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 11-10-2009, 01:28 AM   #7
bigmack
Registered User
 
bigmack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Bird Rock
Posts: 16,697
He won't answer, but is Bob Selvin serious with this garbage

If I were Jeff Siegal I would part ways pronto.

Seems like we hear from him every time a big day rolls around.

Darn shame there's a lack of rope a dopes around here. Then again....

Our site of redboardingsuckers.com had post position 2 as the winning flavor.

Check out our SuperDuper Results:
29.80, 44.60, 3.80 or $78.20 for $20 bet.

Think of what you could do with that money!!

See ya next year. (two days later)


Last edited by bigmack; 11-10-2009 at 01:29 AM.
bigmack is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 11-10-2009, 01:40 AM   #8
Turfday
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Westwood/Century City CA
Posts: 588
I don't think you read the link that I posted

That was the jist of my post and not just this year's results.
__________________
Here's to fast horses & big mutuels,

Bob Selvin

http://nationalturf.com
Turfday is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 11-10-2009, 01:46 AM   #9
bigmack
Registered User
 
bigmack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Bird Rock
Posts: 16,697
Quote:
Originally Posted by Turfday
That was the jist of my post and not just this year's results.
Ah, now I see.




It had nothing to do with:



bigmack is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 11-10-2009, 01:47 AM   #10
Turfday
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Westwood/Century City CA
Posts: 588
Actually, it had to do with ONLY 20/1 shots and above

.
Betting Interests

20-1 or higher $2 Win Wager Total Return ROI

All-time 20-1 or higher 727 $1454.00 $1618.70 25%
__________________
Here's to fast horses & big mutuels,

Bob Selvin

http://nationalturf.com

Last edited by Turfday; 11-10-2009 at 01:57 AM. Reason: typo
Turfday is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 11-10-2009, 01:50 AM   #11
bigmack
Registered User
 
bigmack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Bird Rock
Posts: 16,697
bigmack is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 11-10-2009, 01:52 AM   #12
Turfday
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Westwood/Century City CA
Posts: 588
Or a poster not bothering to read the value of the link ?

IMPATIENT:

im⋅pa⋅tient  /ɪmˈpeɪʃənt/ Show Spelled Pronunciation [im-pey-shuhnt] Show IPA
Use IMPATIENT in a Sentence


–adjective 1. not patient; not accepting delay, opposition, pain, etc., with calm or patience.

2. indicating lack of patience: an impatient answer.

3. restless in desire or expectation; eagerly desirous.

—Idiom4. impatient of, intolerant of: impatient of any interruptions.

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Betting Interests

20-1 or higher $2 Win Wager Total Return ROI

All-time 20-1 or higher 727 $1454.00 $1618.70 25%



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
__________________
Here's to fast horses & big mutuels,

Bob Selvin

http://nationalturf.com

Last edited by Turfday; 11-10-2009 at 01:55 AM.
Turfday is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 11-10-2009, 02:06 AM   #13
bigmack
Registered User
 
bigmack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Bird Rock
Posts: 16,697
I give. You're right.

Next year I follow/buy your approach. Thanks for the insight.
bigmack is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 11-10-2009, 02:46 AM   #14
Turfday
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Westwood/Century City CA
Posts: 588
Comprehensively through the history of BC (1984-2009)

There have been a grand total of 848 Breeder's Cup starters at 20/1 or higher.

A blind $2 win bet on all 848 would cost $1,696.

The return is $1,854.10...a profit of $158.10. Not quite 10%. I trust most handicappers making $2 win bets on 848 Breeder's Cup starters of their choice would fare worse and I would place myself at the top of that list.

Unfortunately, the plays of 20/1 or higher are not broke down by field size.

Perhaps it be reasonable to assume that if you limited your plays at 20/1 or higher to the bigger fields sizes that you would enhance the profit potential ?

It would be interesting to find out if there is a correlation with field size.
__________________
Here's to fast horses & big mutuels,

Bob Selvin

http://nationalturf.com

Last edited by Turfday; 11-10-2009 at 02:48 AM.
Turfday is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Reply





Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

» Advertisement
» Current Polls
Wh deserves to be the favorite? (last 4 figures)
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:45 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Copyright 1999 - 2023 -- PaceAdvantage.Com -- All Rights Reserved
We are a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program
designed to provide a means for us to earn fees by linking to Amazon.com and affiliated sites.