Go Back   Horse Racing Forum - PaceAdvantage.Com - Horse Racing Message Board > Thoroughbred Horse Racing Discussion > General Racing Discussion
User Name
Password

View Poll Results: Which would you rather play
High quality horses in races with short fields 15 13.04%
Low quality horses in races with full fields 100 86.96%
Voters: 115. Non-members may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Rate Thread Display Modes
Old 10-29-2009, 06:52 PM   #1
Warren Henry
RIGHT
 
Warren Henry's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Kansas City Missouri
Posts: 624
vCash: 1000
VOTE Cheap Full Fields vs Quality Short Fields

A couple of recent threads have prompted me to post this poll. As a player, would you rather watch/bet higher quality races with short fields or lower quality races with full fields?

My records show that I do better in the bottom level races - regardless of the track where I play.
__________________
Warren
________________________________

The most important software is between your ears
Warren Henry is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 10-29-2009, 06:57 PM   #2
Horseplayersbet.com
 
Horseplayersbet.com's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 919
vCash: 1000
I prefer cheap conditioned races with 8-11 horses. I see a 5 horse allowance field in California with a 6-5 shot and an 8-5 shot, and I'd rather listen to how my wife's day was than think about betting it.
__________________
Great Player Rewards Given Out Weekly. 100% Parimutuel. Free Live Video and Replays.
https://bet.horseplayersbet.com/
"Where Horseplayers have a fighting chance to win."
Horseplayersbet.com is online now   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 10-29-2009, 07:02 PM   #3
GaryG
Riding Shotgun
 
GaryG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Ruby Ridge
Posts: 3,777
vCash: 1124
If you like to bet there is no question about it.
__________________
My long hair just can't cover up my red neck
GaryG is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 10-29-2009, 07:17 PM   #4
CBedo
AllAboutTheROE
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Denver
Posts: 1,809
vCash: 864
Send a message via AIM to CBedo
Although high quality animals are beautiful to watch run, for their physical beauty and mental toughness, it's a no brainer. Full fields trump quality fields.

The key though for me is "competitive" full fields, no matter what the quality. Some races (high and low quality) have full fields, but if 2/3 of the field has zero chance, then you don't get the benefit of having a full field.
__________________
"No problem can withstand the assault of sustained thinking" -- Voltaire
CBedo is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 10-29-2009, 07:22 PM   #5
Valuist
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 7,601
vCash: 1000
Does a 7 or 8 horse field count as a small field? I'll take an 8 horse stakes race over the 12 horse 5000 NW2 lifetime race any day.
Valuist is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 10-29-2009, 07:25 PM   #6
GaryG
Riding Shotgun
 
GaryG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Ruby Ridge
Posts: 3,777
vCash: 1124
Nothing like those $8K mdn claimers with overflow fields at Tampa.
__________________
My long hair just can't cover up my red neck
GaryG is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 10-29-2009, 09:35 PM   #7
senortout
"skype" as senortout
 
senortout's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 211
vCash: 1000
I would choose a shorter field of tougher horses, not necessarily classier, but fitter. I can tell the difference between fit horses, more easily than I can distinguish between those who are racing poorly. If someone is trying to buy the race with a sharp class drop, things of that nature are ok too. I do like stakes caliber races a lot, and of course, the upcoming BC races will have rather full fields, but these are fit, ready horses for the most part.

senortout
senortout is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 10-29-2009, 09:54 PM   #8
Zman179
Registered Wacko
 
Zman179's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Close to Aqueduct
Posts: 1,452
vCash: 1000
Wow! 32 to 3 in favor of the cheapies. That speaks volumes.
Zman179 is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 10-29-2009, 09:55 PM   #9
Valuist
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 7,601
vCash: 1000
Quote:
Originally Posted by CBedo
Although high quality animals are beautiful to watch run, for their physical beauty and mental toughness, it's a no brainer. Full fields trump quality fields.

The key though for me is "competitive" full fields, no matter what the quality. Some races (high and low quality) have full fields, but if 2/3 of the field has zero chance, then you don't get the benefit of having a full field.


Exactly. Most of the real garbage races have about 3 contenders and 9 horses who may not even finish the race. Contrast that with a stakes race, where all the horses are quality. I'd rather bet on a 20-1 shot in a stakes moving up in class off a win than a 20-1 shot in a 4000 claimer who's been constantly beaten double digits at the same level.
Valuist is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 10-29-2009, 10:00 PM   #10
post time
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 59
vCash: 1000
FIELD SIZES

Much rather have big fields. How many times have you watched a jockey rate and ride for second because he dont think he can beat the big favorite
post time is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 10-29-2009, 10:01 PM   #11
HuggingTheRail
BC Canada
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 270
vCash: 632
Quote:
Originally Posted by Horseplayersbet.com
I prefer cheap conditioned races with 8-11 horses. I see a 5 horse allowance field in California with a 6-5 shot and an 8-5 shot, and I'd rather listen to how my wife's day was than think about betting it.


Now there's a poll question....
HuggingTheRail is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 10-29-2009, 10:02 PM   #12
Zman179
Registered Wacko
 
Zman179's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Close to Aqueduct
Posts: 1,452
vCash: 1000
Quote:
Originally Posted by CBedo

The key though for me is "competitive" full fields, no matter what the quality. Some races (high and low quality) have full fields, but if 2/3 of the field has zero chance, then you don't get the benefit of having a full field.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Valuist
Exactly. Most of the real garbage races have about 3 contenders and 9 horses who may not even finish the race. Contrast that with a stakes race, where all the horses are quality. I'd rather bet on a 20-1 shot in a stakes moving up in class off a win than a 20-1 shot in a 4000 claimer who's been constantly beaten double digits at the same level.



The best thing about cheap tracks is that even the 2/3rds with "zero chance" can get in the number and blow it up really good! On the 28th at Beulah, one race had a $12 ex and an $844 super. The very next race had a $16 exacta, yet a $1646 super! Good luck finding payoffs like that in a six horse field at Santa Anita...well, other than the $12 exacta.

Last edited by Zman179 : 10-29-2009 at 10:05 PM.
Zman179 is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 10-29-2009, 10:07 PM   #13
Zman179
Registered Wacko
 
Zman179's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Close to Aqueduct
Posts: 1,452
vCash: 1000
Quote:
Originally Posted by Valuist
Does a 7 or 8 horse field count as a small field?


I would consider a short field to be 7 or less. 8 horses still gives a good chance at catching an overlay exotic.

Give me a meaty 12 horse $3500 maiden claimer at Beulah Park any day. You can keep the graded stakes with five horses in them, like it does the bettors any good watching a 3/5 coast by open lengths. I'd definitely bet on full field graded stakes, but it's so rare to actually find one.

Last edited by Zman179 : 10-29-2009 at 10:15 PM.
Zman179 is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 10-29-2009, 10:35 PM   #14
Overlay
Value Player
 
Overlay's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: McAlester, Oklahoma
Posts: 3,094
vCash: 1000
From a fair-odds / value perspective, I'd say larger fields make it easier for solid contenders to get lost in the shuffle, and be underbet, while still having a legitimate chance to win. On the other hand, the likely overbetting on favored standouts in races with small fields can also be useful on those occasions when the favorite doesn't get the job done, as long as you can reliably forecast when that will be (which I would assume, however, would not be as often as in a larger field).

Last edited by Overlay : 10-29-2009 at 10:37 PM.
Overlay is online now   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 10-30-2009, 12:12 AM   #15
raybo
EXCEL with SUPERFECTAS
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Gun Barrel City,Tx
Posts: 1,838
vCash: 1000
Send a message via MSN to raybo Send a message via Yahoo to raybo
Less than $15,000 claimer's, 3yo & up, nw2/nw3, 8 or more horses, dirt.

Cheap mdn claimers, 3yo and up, 8 horses or more, dirt or turf.

Big payoffs in the super pools.
__________________
Ray
Horseracing's like the stock market except you don't have to wait as long to go broke.

AllData_EXCEL spreadsheet website & blog
Horseplayers Association of North America
HANA BLOG
raybo is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Reply

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:02 AM.





Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.0.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright 1999 - 2010 -- PaceAdvantage.Com -- All Rights Reserved -- Best Viewed @ 1024x768 Resolution Or Higher