Horse Racing Forum - PaceAdvantage.Com - Horse Racing Message Board

Go Back   Horse Racing Forum - PaceAdvantage.Com - Horse Racing Message Board > Thoroughbred Horse Racing Discussion > General Racing Discussion


Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
Old 08-12-2009, 02:46 AM   #1
Imriledup
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 1,988
Takeout supplements horse racing industry

Lets compare horse racing to the NFL for a second. The NFL charges a one time 'fee' to enjoy their entertainment experience, you pay a one time fee and you get to enter the stadium and enjoy 2 or 3 hours of football on that one charge. With horse racing, you get charged on every race and not only do you get charged on every race, but every dollar you wager gets charged the same amount.

With the NFL, if you buy an upper deck seat, you pay much less money than a 50 yard line seat. In horse racing, each person pays the same, each dollar is 'charged' 20 cents to participate.

Don't get me wrong, i love the 'beauty' of horse racing, but after about the 5th time i've seen horses run in a circle, the novelty wore off. I don't go to the track anymore for the excitement of a 'sporting event' i go there as an investor.

I hate to think that every dollar i wager, 20 cents (blended) goes to put on the show. Honestly, i don't really want to pay to put on the show, i don't have any problem betting on Ant races instead of horse races. With ants, there would really be no overhead, ants don't eat as much as horses, ant trainers won't be walking around with Armani suits and driving brand new mercedes. I'm not sure what the expenses would be to be an ant trainer, but you could probably avoid stall rent and keep your prized ants in a little case in a room in your own house. With ant races, i'm guessing we can get that takeout down to 2 or 3 percent per race.

Back to horse racing and them charging a takeout rate on every dollar that everyone bets.

If i go to the races and bet 1000 for the day, i'm paying 200 dollars towards purses and other expenses for the track to 'put on the show'. The guy standing next to me might only risk 50 dollars for the entire day, that guy, who's getting to enjoy the same sporting event as i'm getting to enjoy, only has to pay 10 bucks, while i pay 200. Doesn't seem fair, right?

I would actually pay 200 dollars admission fee to get into the track as a one time fee if they would let me bet 'takeout free' races. I think 200 per day is plenty of money for one person to contribute to 'the show'.

Bring on the Ant races with a 3 pct takeout.
Imriledup is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 08-12-2009, 12:19 PM   #2
macguy
Registered User
 
macguy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 476
I'm wondering if you're really comparing apples to oranges.

I realize that both horse racing and football are sporting events, I think your comparison is perhaps not quite accurate.

I would think a more apt comparison would be going to the racetrack for the races, and going to a sports book to bet on football.

When people pay to buy tickets to a football game, they immediately know that there will be no fiscal return on investment, they are simply paying for the enjoyment of watching the game.

When people go to the racetrack, most go for gambling entertainment, not "watching the horses" entertainment.
macguy is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 08-12-2009, 04:01 PM   #3
Pacingguy
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 349
So?

Tell us something we don't know. This is part of the problem racing is having. Everyone wants to have horse racing; no one wants to pay for it. Racing is an expensive sport to put on and you will never get it down to a real low takeout rate. That being said, there certainly is room to reduce the takeout to a more reasonable level.

We all have a choice when it comes to wagering. If you want a real small takeout, I suggest you head to your local casino. if you want to wager on an sporting event, then there is horse racing, unless you can find that ant track.
Pacingguy is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 08-12-2009, 04:12 PM   #4
DeanT
Registered User
 
DeanT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Toronto
Posts: 4,962
Quote:
Originally Posted by Imriledup
Bring on the Ant races with a 3 pct takeout.
You make a good point. Racing has to learn what/who their customers are, and they seem to have a problem with it. Maybe because they do not like the answer? One way or another, they sure do not want to tackle the core problem, which you speak about in your post.

Quote:
David Willmot runs Canada's famous Woodbine racecourse. He has watched his business lose ground at a frightening rate to competitors
By the end he put it to one of the punters that his betting on a soulless internet exchange - which was not putting money back into racing - would eventually see the death of the thoroughbred business. "You'll be betting on frogs," Willmot offered. The punter replied: "Then I'll find the fastest frog."

Nothing illustrates racing's problem better. Some studies show as much as 95 per cent of thoroughbred betting is done by pure punters, five per cent by traditional horse lovers. And punters will bet where they get the best service and the best return on the dollar.
DeanT is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 08-12-2009, 09:11 PM   #5
Horseplayersbet.com
Registered User
 
Horseplayersbet.com's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 2,585
If betting would magically stop on NFL games tomorrow, the league might as well go out of business.
You know what fuels the NFL, what creates the advertising market, what sells the merchandise? It is the low takeout gambling aspect of it.

It has a ripple affect.

And yes, the NFL is an expensive game to put on too.
__________________

Horseplayersbet.com is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 08-12-2009, 10:54 PM   #6
Gone2Golf
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 25
Is takeout too high? YES. But that doesn't compare in anyway to the expenses for other sports. The NFL is $100+ per ticket and what...I get to sit there and maybe see the game that would be better viewed on television. There has to be takeout to fund the sport of racing...it is very expensive.
Now if we were only going to have two or three tracks run per day and everyone is betting on these few products...then you could have a 5% takeout and still have huge purses. In fact, that would probably be the best thing for racing...eliminate 30,000 of the 60,000 races per year and we'd all be better off!
Gone2Golf is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 08-12-2009, 11:51 PM   #7
Marlin
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 546
Most of the time when I "enjoy" the NFL I pay 10% takeout on the flip of a coin. Perhaps the worst analogy ever.
Marlin is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 08-12-2009, 11:55 PM   #8
garyscpa
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 1,519
Quote:
Originally Posted by Imriledup
...Bring on the Ant races with a 3 pct takeout.
Just from a handicapping perspective, what do you use as the length of a length in ant racing?

And would we still have to deal with Polytrack?
garyscpa is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 08-13-2009, 01:07 AM   #9
Imriledup
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 1,988
Quote:
Originally Posted by garyscpa
Just from a handicapping perspective, what do you use as the length of a length in ant racing?

And would we still have to deal with Polytrack?
Imriledup is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 08-13-2009, 01:09 AM   #10
Imriledup
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 1,988
Quote:
Originally Posted by Marlin
Most of the time when I "enjoy" the NFL I pay 10% takeout on the flip of a coin. Perhaps the worst analogy ever.
I'm no expert on sports betting, but i think the takeout on sports betting is only 5% (because you don't pay takeout when you win, so half the bets you make are takeout free and the other half you lose 10% which makes the avg approx 5%, assuming you can pick 50% winners)
Imriledup is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 08-13-2009, 01:18 AM   #11
Marlin
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 546
Quote:
Originally Posted by Imriledup
I'm no expert on sports betting, but i think the takeout on sports betting is only 5% (because you don't pay takeout when you win, so half the bets you make are takeout free and the other half you lose 10% which makes the avg approx 5%, assuming you can pick 50% winners)
Maybe I need to pick more winners! You are right of course. The analogy still doesn't work for me. The "novelty" after five races could wear off as easily as the "novelty" after five first downs. JMO!
Marlin is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 08-13-2009, 01:34 AM   #12
Imriledup
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 1,988
Quote:
Originally Posted by Marlin
Maybe I need to pick more winners! You are right of course. The analogy still doesn't work for me. The "novelty" after five races could wear off as easily as the "novelty" after five first downs. JMO!
Money's money, there's no novelty, its all about the dirty green paper with the dead presidents on it! Maybe we ought to take up poker, i mean, how hard can THAT be?
Imriledup is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 08-13-2009, 01:36 AM   #13
Marlin
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 546
Quote:
Originally Posted by Imriledup
Money's money, there's no novelty, its all about the dirty green paper with the dead presidents on it! Maybe we ought to take up poker, i mean, how hard can THAT be?
I'd bet on the ants. But how are you going to "juice" them? And who is going to ride them?
Marlin is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 08-13-2009, 03:30 AM   #14
kenwoodallpromos
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 9,569
Ants; NFL

Horseracing. Horsemen= business; horseplayers= "gaming"; non-betting fans= sport.
Ant races- no thanks, it is not government sanctioned, so if I get caught betting on it I can go to jail.
__________________
http://www.myspace.com/531434141
kenwoodallpromos is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 08-13-2009, 08:11 AM   #15
Horseplayersbet.com
Registered User
 
Horseplayersbet.com's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 2,585
Quote:
Originally Posted by kenwoodallpromos
Horseracing. Horsemen= business; horseplayers= "gaming"; non-betting fans= sport.
Ant races- no thanks, it is not government sanctioned, so if I get caught betting on it I can go to jail.
I wonder if ant racing would draw PETA's attention.
__________________

Horseplayersbet.com is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Reply





Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

» Advertisement
» Current Polls
Wh deserves to be the favorite? (last 4 figures)
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:26 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Copyright 1999 - 2023 -- PaceAdvantage.Com -- All Rights Reserved
We are a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program
designed to provide a means for us to earn fees by linking to Amazon.com and affiliated sites.