WMD Found in Iraq

[Tom]

How will the libs spin this?

http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/ar...TICLE_ID=38213

[JustRalph]

They already have. It is not the stuff (by the DOD own admission) that was used to justify the war, (and the Dems are running with that spin) but I don't think those in range of Mustard Gas or Sarin shells would quibble too much. Especially Israel. I don't think the expiration date on the shells would matter too much to me. Anybody who buries fighter jets must have some other stuff hidden somewhere.


So much for those inspectors doing such a good job, huh?

[Tom]

One thing, it proves for sure SH lied about them and was violating the Gulf War truce agreement.
The libs keep forgeting that as soon as we pulled SH out of his spider hole, Lybia gave up actual nuclear weapons.
Curious, if Kerry want us us out so quick, to call it a "do over" is he in favor of returning them to Khadafy?

[skate]

oh god this is so funny, but oh so serious. now i know the feeling, when someone says, i don't know if i should laiugh or cry, gads.


ya, they gonna feed us with things like "well this here stuff wasn't no good anywho", LOL LOL.

love to see this (gas) put right inside the DC area, on the 4th of July. talk about running, these guys (congress) would be acting like a horny ant colony on viagra.

[Free Bird]

must be a full moon....

[hcap]

Ok guys I'll bite.

Since the WorldNetDaily article is from April 26, 2004, over 2 years ago, how come the WH or the DD or that master of last throes dickh**d cheney, has not latched on to Mr Kenneth R. Timmerman and kissed him up and down, right to left? All over his big fat tucas. Mister Kenneth R. Timmerman has single handedly proved their case.

Where is our war preznit? Shouldn't he be calling a joint session of congress to disclose these new found goods? Can't you just see all the lowly dems and libs shakin' in their shoes. What must they be thinkin' at such a festivity??
"Gawd 50 more years of repubs. We're doomed, doomed I say"

I can just see it now bush adressing the General Assembly at the UN. "Old Europe" cowtowing in awe at the preznits' forsight. Ticker tape parades down past the American Enterprise guys and Faux newz anchor persons orgiastically spouting to all youse guyz out in wingnutland
"We waz right all along"

Oh say did any of yuses happen to catch little Ricky Santorum, whose Senate career is in its final throes, got his hands on a classified document from the National Ground Intelligence Center. He pulled key points out of the document and had them declassified, and then made a big whoop-dee-doo announcement that he had in his hand proof that there were WMDs in Iraq.

"What a coincidence that one week after Karl Rove urged Republicans not to make excuses for going to war against Iraq and to put critical Democrats on the defensive, Senator Rick Santorum (R-PA), 18 points behind in his re-election efforts, and representative Peter Hoekstra (R-MI) suddenly came up with some report that 500 chemical weapons have been found in Iraq. Almost the entire hour of Hannity & Colmes last night (6/21/06) was devoted to this “discovery” despite the fact that FOX News’ own Jim Angle had already reported that the Bush administration said the weapons were not in usable condition and were not the WMD’s for which we went to war."


BTW guys since I did not read all of the WorldNutDaily article, can anyone tell me if it covered say Syria?
Or what about the Iraqi general who also had the goods?
So why dont the big honchos latch on to any of these unverified WMD right wing merrygo rounds?? And make any of it official??

[Secretariat]

Originally Posted by hcap

Ok guys I'll bite.

Since the WorldNetDaily article is from April 26, 2004, over 2 years ago, how come the WH or the DD or that master of last throes dickh**d cheney, has not latched on to Mr Kenneth R. Timmerman and kissed him up and down, right to left? All over his big fat tucas. Mister Kenneth R. Timmerman has single handedly proved their case.

Where is our war preznit? Shouldn't he be calling a joint session of congress to disclose these new found goods? Can't you just see all the lowly dems and libs shakin' in their shoes. What must they be thinkin' at such a festivity??
"Gawd 50 more years of repubs. We're doomed, doomed I say"

I can just see it now bush adressing the General Assembly at the UN. "Old Europe" cowtowing in awe at the preznits' forsight. Ticker tape parades down past the American Enterprise guys and Faux newz anchor persons orgiastically spouting to all youse guyz out in wingnutland
"We waz right all along"

Oh say did any of yuses happen to catch little Ricky Santorum, whose Senate career is in its final throes, got his hands on a classified document from the National Ground Intelligence Center. He pulled key points out of the document and had them declassified, and then made a big whoop-dee-doo announcement that he had in his hand proof that there were WMDs in Iraq.

"What a coincidence that one week after Karl Rove urged Republicans not to make excuses for going to war against Iraq and to put critical Democrats on the defensive, Senator Rick Santorum (R-PA), 18 points behind in his re-election efforts, and representative Peter Hoekstra (R-MI) suddenly came up with some report that 500 chemical weapons have been found in Iraq. Almost the entire hour of Hannity & Colmes last night (6/21/06) was devoted to this “discovery” despite the fact that FOX News’ own Jim Angle had already reported that the Bush administration said the weapons were not in usable condition and were not the WMD’s for which we went to war."


BTW guys since I did not read all of the WorldNutDaily article, can anyone tell me if it covered say Syria?
Or what about the Iraqi general who also had the goods?
So why dont the big honchos latch on to any of these unverified WMD right wing merrygo rounds?? And make any of it official??

Hcap, these guys are desperate quoting worldnet from 2004....

Maybe we could start a thread WMD found in North Korea.....

[Secretariat]

How will neocons spin this?

http://vyan.blogspot.com/2006/06/van...ey-wanted.html

[JohnNUtah]

I want my slice of Saddam well done.

[so.cal.fan]

The emergence of the Islamic sect of Wahhabis in Saudi Arabia marked the onset of the third and still ongoing Jihad as was started by the Ayatollah Khomenini in Iran and bin Laden's Taliban. As a consequence of it it's anti-Western stance, the Wahhabis took down the pro-Western Shah of Iran and Sadat in Egept and attacked Hussein in Jordan, Mubarak in Egept and Musharraf in Pakistan. The overall plan is to infiltrate and take over governments in Egypt, Turkey, Pakistan, Indonesia, The United Arab Emirates, Sudan, Tunisia, Libya, Algeria, Morocco, Yemen, Syria, Lebanon, Jordan, Malaysia, and then , with Pakistan's nuclear capacity, take down Isreal. In this process, the US would also be attacked (World Trade Center, Twin Towers, plus others in planning stages). Growing Arabic populations would deter Europe from U.S. alliances and lead to Arabic dominance in the United Nations.
It was against this background that the U.S. strategy was to prevent militant Islamic-Arabic takeover of 75% of the world's oil supplies and its huge financial power base. (L.Abraham, 2004), plus the acquisistion of nuclear materials by Al Qaeda, ie, bin Laden, via Pakistani nuclear scientists, Russian sources, etc. (Berger, 2004). A Western power base in Iraq would split the Arabian continent in two and deter Arabic takeover and coalescence. Thus, Afghanstan and Iraq were strategic targets for multiple reasons to preclude a clash of civilazations of Islamic militancy with the Western world, which could go on for centuries, as it has in the past. Only the U.S. has the power to prevent such an ongoing cataclysm, as the United Nations was ineffectural and its Security Council impaired by food-for-oil kickbacks of billions of dollars to various members siphoned off by bogus sales, ect.(Food for Oil, 9/19/04).
Thus with this world contextualization, the war in Irq would therefore appear to have been a long-term strategic move to preclude a far worse multinational and perhaps centuries-long series of progressively severe cataclysms )e.g. the triage decision of a pre-emptic strike. (Hawkins 2006)

[Free Bird]

Originally Posted by JohnNUtah

I want my slice of Saddam well done.

We should have barbequed his ass and got out of Dodge ASAP.

[Tom]

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,200499,00.html

[Secretariat]

Originally Posted by Tom

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,200499,00.html

Tom, give it up already. GW's own appointed man Charles Duelfer has already put it to rest as did Republican David Kay before him, and Hans Blix before that. It was cooked intelligence. Even the administration has backed down from that claim - only worlnet and Ricky Santorum are still selling that bologna.

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,134625,00.html

Report: No Iraq WMDs Made After '91
Thursday, October 07, 2004

WASHINGTON — The chief U.S. arms inspector in Iraq has found no evidence of weapons of mass destruction (search) production by Saddam Hussein's (search) regime after 1991.

....

Let's get back to reality. Not manipulated history.

[lsbets]

So Sec are you saying the 500 chemical rounds were not found in Iraq? I'm having a hard time interpreting you telling Tom to get back to reality when he is talking about the 500 rounds that have been found. It seems like you are saying those rounds weren't found.

[Light]

CIA’s final report: No WMD found in Iraq

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/7634313

In his final word, the CIA’s top weapons inspector in Iraq said Monday that the hunt for weapons of mass destruction has “gone as far as feasible” and has found nothing