|
|
02-12-2005, 02:09 PM
|
#1
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 681
|
Prices way, way up for '05 Belmont Stakes
Read this and weep, racing fans. It probably pays to stay home or just to bet the race at a simulcast outlet....
By JERRY BOSSERT
DAILY NEWS SPORTS WRITER
It's more for less at this year's Belmont Stakes as the New York Racing Association has raised prices for the June 11 Belmont Stakes and also banned bringing in alcohol.
Ticket prices, which include admission, will range from $20 to $110. Last year the top ticket, including admission, was just $45.
General admission was $2 but now will be $10. Clubhouse admission jumped from $5 to $20.
Coolers still will be allowed in the backyard area as long as they contain no alcohol or glass containers.
The move to ban alcohol, according to the NYRA, is in the interest of patron safety and an attempt to make sure that people drink responsibly.
There were plenty of fights in the backyard at last year's Belmont.
Belmont still will be serving alcohol to those who want to purchase it, but many will be proofed to eliminate underage drinking. Beers at Belmont range from $4.50 to $5.25.
Seats for the final leg of the Triple Crown will be offered through a lottery. Applications for seats now are available on line at www.nyra.com and those who ordered seats last year will receive applications in the mail. Applications must be postmarked by Feb. 28 in order to receive the highest priority for seat assignment. "We had a record 120,139 people attend the Belmont Stakes last year, when Birdstone stopped Smarty Jones from becoming racing's 12th Triple Crown winner," said NYRA president and CEO Charles Hayward. "It is hard to imagine a 2005 Belmont that could rival (that) excitement ... so we are expecting attendance to be lower this year. But the Belmont Stakes experience will be more comfortable and enjoyable ..."
|
|
|
02-12-2005, 02:13 PM
|
#2
|
@TimeformUSfigs
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Moore, OK
Posts: 46,829
|
Wow, those are some pretty steep increases. It won't matter if there is a horse with a shot at the Triple Crown, but otherwise...
|
|
|
02-12-2005, 06:08 PM
|
#3
|
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: New York
Posts: 1,201
|
I was thinking the same thing, CJ. If they get a Derby/Preakness winner it's a home run but otherwise this could backfire. It is an overdue move, though. They were selling themselves short at the old prices.
|
|
|
02-12-2005, 06:46 PM
|
#4
|
Registered User
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 7,333
|
But the tickets will already be sold so it won't matter if there's a TC horse or not. And, as far as the admission prices, I really doubt many ( if any ) people won't go because they think the admission is too high. Mostly, people have been shocked at low it is.
|
|
|
02-12-2005, 07:46 PM
|
#5
|
Frontrunner
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Pasadena, CA
Posts: 2,797
|
[QUOTE=Doc]The move to ban alcohol, according to the NYRA, is in the interest of patron safety and an attempt to make sure that people drink responsibly.
There were plenty of fights in the backyard at last year's Belmont. [QUOTE]
I can attest to both. During one incident, two drunkards, couldn't have been much more than 20, were mock-wrestling, and almost knocked over a very-pregnant woman. Idiots, and a good move by management.
Back on topic, I agree with those who say it's gonna be huge or non-existant for Belmont. Figure 100,000 for a TC chance, not even a third that for a non-TC year. Big gap, to say the least.
__________________
Aspiring turf writer and handicapper. Follow me on Twitter at @AndrewChampagne!
|
|
|
02-12-2005, 10:10 PM
|
#6
|
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: New York
Posts: 1,201
|
True, TLG, but I was referring to the walk-up. I think you'll lose a lot of the casual younger fans who would go as as a group and make a day of it for $2 but who will balk at the $10. I think that, combined with the new alcohol policy (also overdue but kudos to Hayward), will cut attendance figures, but it's debatable how much those fans will be missed, in more ways than one.
|
|
|
02-12-2005, 10:28 PM
|
#7
|
Registered User
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 7,333
|
I'm not sure I agree. $10 is just so little these days. hell, that's what it costs to go to the movies.
I also agree about the booze. It is kind of funny coming from Charlie, however.
|
|
|
02-12-2005, 10:30 PM
|
#8
|
Registered User
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 7,333
|
And yer right, I sure wouldn't miss them. And let's face it, if they were paying $2 a pop, the gain with the new prices will much more than make up for the loss, even if it's 20,000.
|
|
|
02-12-2005, 10:31 PM
|
#9
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 270
|
Anyone know Derby & Preakness pricing for interesting comparison?? These prices are probably fair. Just seems startling because it's been so cheap for so long. Can't really blame them for the price adjustment. There have been so many Derby-Preakness winners lately. And based on trainer patterns that trend seems it could become the norm. Seriously doubt people are going to walk away from the gates or not go. Big events are big money. That's our society. It's basic supply and demand. As for the alcohol rule: Can't blame them on that either after last year's disgraceful behavior from the bad apples.
|
|
|
02-12-2005, 10:38 PM
|
#10
|
Registered User
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 7,333
|
I know it's been at least $20 to get in the infield at Churchill for years. The seat prices are outrageous. The best seats at Pimlico are $275 or $225. I can't remember what admission at Pimlico is ( it's actually included with your seat if you have one ) but I think it's $15 or $20.
|
|
|
02-12-2005, 10:44 PM
|
#11
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 270
|
For Churchill infield is that a $20 infield fee plus gate admission? And what about parking at these tracks on their Triple Crown days?
|
|
|
02-12-2005, 10:58 PM
|
#12
|
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: New York
Posts: 1,201
|
I belive infield admission at the Derby is up to around $35 or $40, which includes the gate. I think Pimlico is indeed $15, but I can't remember..
The last few years that there hasn't been a TC bid the attendance has been in the 30-40,000 range, I believe. If there's no TC bid this year I think we may see an even lower figure, given the changes. But you're probably right, TLG, the extra fees will very likely make up the difference. Again, if there is a TC bid, it's a home run and it's well-deserved, given the magnitude of the event.
|
|
|
02-12-2005, 11:11 PM
|
#13
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Saratoga Springs NY
Posts: 1,427
|
What are you guys smokin????
http://tinyurl.com/3rocb
NYRA is still a great bargain for "an event"
|
|
|
02-12-2005, 11:25 PM
|
#14
|
The Voice of Reason!
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Canandaigua, New york
Posts: 112,887
|
I felt like I was raped paying $3 to get into Saratoga!
Paying admission to a racetrack is just...so......RIDICULOUS!
__________________
Who does the Racing Form Detective like in this one?
|
|
|
02-13-2005, 12:02 AM
|
#15
|
Support Res-Q Foundations
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: New York
Posts: 1,488
|
When Commendable won the Belmont Stakes in 2000, when there was NO Triple Crown on the line, the attendance at Belmont Park was 67,810.
When Point Given won the Belmont Stakes in 2001, when there was NO Triple Crown on the line, the attendance at Belmont Park was 73,857.
Those numbers are far cries from 30,000-40,000.
__________________
"You don't throw a whole life away because it's banged up a little," (from Seabiscuit)
Last edited by Observer; 02-13-2005 at 12:04 AM.
|
|
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|