Which would you prefer?

[Track Phantom]

Curious what people would choose between these two if you only had one choice:

1. 10% takeout across the board but rampant drugs influencing every result and small fields (say an avg of 6.5 per race)

OR

2. 25% takeout across the board but no drugs and larger fields (say an avg of 10 per race)

I know neither of these things are ever going to happen but wonder which you'd prefer. For me, it would be #2.

[Jeff P]

How about address both? (Instead of ignoring both.)


-jp

.

[cj]

1...you can't win at those takeout rates.

[therussmeister]

2. I play a lot of superfectas so that's about the takeout I'm getting now.

[AndyC]

The question reminds me of a bit done by Kevin Nealon.

https://vimeo.com/27549369

[cj]

Originally Posted by therussmeister

2. I play a lot of superfectas so that's about the takeout I'm getting now.

You'd get a lot more competition in that pool than you do now though.

[thespaah]

Pennsylvania charges 31% on vertical bets of three or more plus all horizontals except Doubles....AND get all the other crap to go with it.