|
05-17-2014, 06:33 PM
|
#1
|
Longacres transplant
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Vashon island
Posts: 237
|
Higher or lower odd's on CC
Damn.....3 more weeks of Chromeo love. My question is will he be better odd's in the Belmont. I am thinking 4/5 ?
|
|
|
05-17-2014, 06:50 PM
|
#2
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 733
|
2/5 Belmont odds on chrome
|
|
|
05-17-2014, 07:33 PM
|
#3
|
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Oklahoma City, Oklahoma
Posts: 7,706
|
If I were at the track or other betting outlet, I'd want to have a ticket (uncashed) on him just as a souvenir in case he wins. Might keep his odds down.
Last edited by Overlay; 05-17-2014 at 07:36 PM.
|
|
|
05-17-2014, 07:41 PM
|
#4
|
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 1,753
|
With a possible 14 horse full field gunning for Chrome, I'm thinking he will be 2-5......& only because its so hard to win the triple crown.
Good thing he will have 3 weeks to get his energy back & get back to his routine.
My friend wanted to make a 1k bet on Chrome but was scared, so I told him to bet him for place, he might pay more.......he ended up paying the same as his win, lol!
I believe he might pay more to place in Belmont than his win.
|
|
|
05-17-2014, 07:46 PM
|
#5
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Athens - Greece
Posts: 326
|
What leg has the majority of triple crown fallers (include Kentucky) ?
|
|
|
05-17-2014, 08:05 PM
|
#6
|
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: route 66
Posts: 1,112
|
I can't wait for the show pool...
|
|
|
05-17-2014, 08:09 PM
|
#7
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Athens - Greece
Posts: 326
|
From those horses that won 2 out of 3 where did most fail ?
K, P or B ?
|
|
|
05-17-2014, 08:18 PM
|
#8
|
Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 25,607
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dark Horse
I can't wait for the show pool...
|
There will be too much money on the other runners to show, it won't matter if he's off the board, show won't be a bonanza.
|
|
|
05-17-2014, 08:20 PM
|
#9
|
Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 25,607
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by SecretAgentMan
With a possible 14 horse full field gunning for Chrome, I'm thinking he will be 2-5......& only because its so hard to win the triple crown.
Good thing he will have 3 weeks to get his energy back & get back to his routine.
My friend wanted to make a 1k bet on Chrome but was scared, so I told him to bet him for place, he might pay more.......he ended up paying the same as his win, lol!
I believe he might pay more to place in Belmont than his win.
|
He might because people will be betting him just to have a souvenir ticket on him to win.
Everyone there will have at least 2 bucks on him to win, so he might be 2-5 and will surely be overbet to his actual chances.
|
|
|
05-17-2014, 08:23 PM
|
#10
|
Veteran
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 692
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by cosmicway
From those horses that won 2 out of 3 where did most fail ?
K, P or B ?
|
Depends upon how one looks at it.
The first horse that won one leg of the Triple Crown while running in all 3 races (War Cloud) did it in 1918, 43 years after they were all in existence. Before that, there were at least a half dozen horses that won the eastern pair (plus Man o' War and Pillory later) without being sent to Louisville.
Then there was a stretch where the Preakness became the bugaboo. But beginning in the 1950s, it's primarily been the Belmont. It would take a little more time to grind through the data for a complete picture.
|
|
|
05-17-2014, 08:28 PM
|
#11
|
Dead money
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Baltimore
Posts: 3,838
|
2.60 win
3.30 place
__________________
Bustout degenerate gambler
|
|
|
05-17-2014, 09:32 PM
|
#12
|
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Oklahoma City, Oklahoma
Posts: 7,706
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by clocker7
Depends upon how one looks at it.
The first horse that won one leg of the Triple Crown while running in all 3 races (War Cloud) did it in 1918, 43 years after they were all in existence. Before that, there were at least a half dozen horses that won the eastern pair (plus Man o' War and Pillory later) without being sent to Louisville.
Then there was a stretch where the Preakness became the bugaboo. But beginning in the 1950s, it's primarily been the Belmont. It would take a little more time to grind through the data for a complete picture.
|
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_...ughbred_Racing
According to the chart at the above link, since Sir Barton won the first Triple Crown in 1919, 46 horses have won two (but not all three) of the three legs. (Five horses before then had won the Preakness and the Belmont but not the Derby (in 1877, 1878, 1880, 1881, and 1895), but I'm not sure that the scheduling of the races at that time would have made a Triple Crown possible.) Of those 46, 13 did not win the Derby, 11 did not win the Preakness, and 22 did not win the Belmont. (I also did not delve into which of the non-winners did not even start in the one race of the three that they didn't win.)
Last edited by Overlay; 05-17-2014 at 09:47 PM.
|
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|