Horse Racing Forum - PaceAdvantage.Com - Horse Racing Message Board

Go Back   Horse Racing Forum - PaceAdvantage.Com - Horse Racing Message Board


Horse Racing Forum - PaceAdvantage.Com - Horse Racing Message Board

Horse Racing Forum - PaceAdvantage.Com - Horse Racing Message Board (http://www.paceadvantage.com/forum/index.php)
-   General Handicapping Discussion (http://www.paceadvantage.com/forum/forumdisplay.php?f=2)
-   -   Adjusting par times (http://www.paceadvantage.com/forum/showthread.php?t=108798)

banacek 12-04-2013 05:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JohnGalt1

I've used the Cynthia pars for years.

Can you tell me if the Cynthia pars vary by distance or are they the way I explained in the original post? That is, do the pars between each distance at a particular track differ by the same amount regardless of class or do they vary?

Much appreciated.

proximity 12-04-2013 08:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by banacek
Can you tell me if the Cynthia pars vary by distance or are they the way I explained in the original post? That is, do the pars between each distance at a particular track differ by the same amount regardless of class or do they vary?

Much appreciated.

aqu (m)

dist............6f...............6 1/2 f

md 12......112 0/5.........119 3/5... (7 3/5)
stk gr.......108 3/5.........115 2/5.... (6 4/5)

hope this helps. I have to take off NOW for a poker trip to a.c., but you can pm me any questions and i'll answer when I get back (probably sunday). I don't make ratings based on Cynthia pars but do usually get them to keep a file of supplemental info like the winning move factors.....

banacek 12-04-2013 08:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by proximity
aqu (m)

dist............6f...............6 1/2 f

md 12......112 0/5.........119 3/5... (7 3/5)
stk gr.......108 3/5.........115 2/5.... (6 4/5)

hope this helps. I have to take off NOW for a poker trip to a.c., but you can pm me any questions and i'll answer when I get back (probably sunday). I don't make ratings based on Cynthia pars but do usually get them to keep a file of supplemental info like the winning move factors.....

Thanks, that's exactly what I wanted to know. Makes much more sense to me. Much appreciated!

Dave Schwartz 12-04-2013 10:40 PM

I took a look at this today and have created something that I think will fix the problem of the pace pars. It will be in the next release.

Cratos 12-05-2013 07:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by thaskalos
I think you are making a small mistake when stating the "Beyer view" above, Dave; this wasn't the idea behind Beyer's assertion that the value of a length should diminish as the race gets longer.

This is what Beyer presented as proof that a value-length adjustment should be made for the various distances:

When a human athlete runs a mile and his time is one second slower than the world record for the mile...then he is considered one of the world's best milers himself. But when he runs a 100-meter dash in a time that is one second slower than that of the 100-meter world record...then he is considered as nothing special at all.

This is hard to refute...IMO.

But the original poster is making a different point...which Beyer also addressed in one of his books:

The OP is talking about the adjustment that par charts make when projecting the horses' 6-furlong speed out to 6.5 furlongs.

In almost all the par charts we see...the difference between 6 and 6.5 furlongs is always either 6.4 or 6.6 seconds -- regardless of class. A stakes horse who runs the 6f in 1:08.6 is expected to run the 6.5f in 1:15 (a difference of 6.4 seconds)...while the 5,000 claimer who runs the 6f in 1:13.6 is expected to run the 6.5f in 1:20 (the same difference of 6.4 seconds).

What the OP poster is asking is what Beyer himself asked...and what I -- and many other players -- have been asking for years now:

How is the 5,000 claimer able to negotiate the extra half-furlong of the 6.5f race in the same exact time as the stakes horse...when their ability levels are so different?

Shouldn't it take longer for the 5,000 claimer to travel that extra half-furlong than it takes a stakes horse?

Try using logarithmic curves as oppose to linear curves.

JohnGalt1 12-05-2013 08:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by banacek
Can you tell me if the Cynthia pars vary by distance or are they the way I explained in the original post? That is, do the pars between each distance at a particular track differ by the same amount regardless of class or do they vary?

Much appreciated.


Using my par chart and numerical comparison rating, some tracks are equal for all sprints like Mountaineer are all 86 and Sunland are all 93.

My ratings for Santa Anita sprints are all 90 except 7f is 92 and 6 and 6 1/2f is 94.

Lone Star sprints are 5f 85, 5.5f 87 and all others are 89.

Routes are the same, some are one number and Tampa is 78 for all distances, except 9f is 75.

I use the Hambleton pace chart from Sartin's Pace Makes the Race.

Hope this helps.

classhandicapper 12-06-2013 10:29 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cj
I think there are two different things being discussed here, and there is some confusion. How is the value of a "beaten length" relevant to par times, which are based on the winner? They seem like two different things to me.

I agree.

My own research into beaten lengths at the finish is consistent with what Dave is saying. The average winning margins increase as distances lengthen, but not by as much as some people think.

But that's entirely different thing than the time relationships of various quality horses as horses stretch out in distance.

cj 12-06-2013 01:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by classhandicapper
I agree.

My own research into beaten lengths at the finish is consistent with what Dave is saying. The average winning margins increase as distances lengthen, but not by as much as some people think.

But that's entirely different thing than the time relationships of various quality horses as horses stretch out in distance.

I was starting to wonder if anyone had a clue what I was talking about there!

banacek 12-17-2013 02:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dave Schwartz
I took a look at this today and have created something that I think will fix the problem of the pace pars. It will be in the next release.

Hi Dave,

Can you elaborate on this a bit. Before I purchase any more pars, I need to make sure they truly meet my needs.

Thanks

Dave Schwartz 12-17-2013 03:02 PM

The will be done on a ratio basis, using a multiplier.

In other words, as the final time increases (or decreases) the pace times will increase (or decrease) proportionately.

banacek 12-17-2013 03:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dave Schwartz
The will be done on a ratio basis, using a multiplier.

In other words, as the final time increases (or decreases) the pace times will increase (or decrease) proportionately.

But what about the final times? Will they vary between distances based on the class? Thanks

Robert Goren 12-17-2013 04:21 PM

Back in the day, I found that I had adjust my par times according to field size. There is probably 2/5ths of second between a 6 horse field and a 12 horse field at 6f and 3/5 at a mile 1&1/16 in cheap claimers.

Dave Schwartz 12-17-2013 07:46 PM

Banacek,

They already do.

I think you are looking for a hand-crafted number for every track-surface-distance-class. That CANNOT exist because there will be years where a particular class NEVER ran a particular distance.

The numbers must be extrapolated.

banacek 12-17-2013 08:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dave Schwartz
Banacek,

They already do.

I think you are looking for a hand-crafted number for every track-surface-distance-class. That CANNOT exist because there will be years where a particular class NEVER ran a particular distance.

The numbers must be extrapolated.

I understand that, but Stakes races are run every year as are 4000 claimers and the difference between a 6f and a mile and a sixteenth are not the same....there has to be a difference between distances for each class or I can't make reliable daily variants.

I have extrapolated them in the past, but wanted something where this already being done. Clearly for other users they are useful. but they just won't work for what I need them for. That's okay, I was just curious about the changes you were making. Thanks anyway.

Delta Cone 12-17-2013 08:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Robert Goren
Back in the day, I found that I had adjust my par times according to field size. There is probably 2/5ths of second between a 6 horse field and a 12 horse field at 6f and 3/5 at a mile 1&1/16 in cheap claimers.

Curious...were the races generally slower in small fields? Or faster?


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:24 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Copyright 1999 - 2023 -- PaceAdvantage.Com -- All Rights Reserved

» Advertisement
» Current Polls
Wh deserves to be the favorite? (last 4 figures)
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:24 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Copyright 1999 - 2023 -- PaceAdvantage.Com -- All Rights Reserved
We are a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program
designed to provide a means for us to earn fees by linking to Amazon.com and affiliated sites.