Horse Racing Forum - PaceAdvantage.Com - Horse Racing Message Board

Go Back   Horse Racing Forum - PaceAdvantage.Com - Horse Racing Message Board > Thoroughbred Horse Racing Discussion > Horseplayers Association of North America (H.A.N.A.)


Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
Old 12-06-2010, 03:10 PM   #1
rwwupl
Registered User
 
rwwupl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 1,085
Call for Change at the CHRB

This commentary was put out in California to the concerned politicians,regulators,writers and horse players.


A Call for Change at the CHRB


California Horse Racing


Various conflicts of interests with the California Horse Racing Board (CHRB) have led to the decline of support of horse racing from the citizens of California.

The CHRB is tasked with serving the public interest, not the interests of one aspect of the industry over another. The CHRB has lacked appropriate balance in the membership. It is unacceptable for a public Board to be so dominated by interests of one segment of the industry they are charged with regulating.

The United States has 38 racing jurisdictions and the states of New York, New Jersey, Illinois, Texas, and Florida are among the largest and all prohibit their racing board members from having any financial interest in the business. Arizona allows only one member to have a financial interest in the industry and Maryland allows no more than four of its nine members to own horses.

A number of California state boards also prohibit such conflicts of interests by barring those in the industry from serving as members, including the Medical Board, Dental Board, Board of Optometry, and Board of Accountancy.

The leadership of the seven members CHRB is dominated by licensed horse owners and by law they are also members of the Thoroughbred Owners of California (TOC), a horsemen’s advocate organization that is supported by over a million dollars per year from the betting public takeout money. The TOC members pay no dues for their support, along with other horsemen advocate groups in California.

We think California would be better served by limiting the CHRB to no more than three members with a financial interest in the industry, and the Chairman should have no financial interest at all.

The actions of the CHRB have destroyed the original business model that led to success, by approving for horsemen larger purses upon demand at the expense of the betting public. The takeout has escalated in California from 10% to 20% and headed for 30% with a deteriorating program presented to the customers and endangering the entire industry that provides 50,000 jobs and $50 million in state and local tax revenue and millions of dollars for charitable programs and endowments.

The CHRB has failed in its mission in all respects…

Mission Statement

The purpose of the California Horse Racing Board is to regulate pari-mutuel wagering for the protection of the betting public, to promote horse racing and breeding industries, and to maximize State of California tax reves.


A few years ago S/B 27 ($40 million) was intended to resolve the problems by granting from the State a 3% additional takeout for horseman purses instead of lowering the takeout for the customers to meet increased competition from other gaming. The result was that horsemen paid more for their horses and all costs increased across the board for all supporting services and made California one of the most expensive places in the country to maintain a racehorse, and support from customers continued to dwindle.

The recent takeout increase of 2-3% on exotic bets that begins on December 26th at Santa Anita flies in the face of reality. Instead of working to find the optimum price point (The price point that produces the maximum profit to those who put on the show)of the bet, the CHRB have supported (A/B2414,$70 million) another increase specifically for horsemen’s purses proposed by the TOC and added to the burden of racings customers. This is in conflict with other jurisdictions (NYRA,etc.) that are trying to find ways to lower the cost of the bet to compete with other gaming such as Sports Betting and Poker.

The recent fiasco at Los Alamitos when the CHRB allowed an increase of 2% to the takeout at the request of Los Alamitos after the Horseplayers Association of North America (HANA) had proven without any doubt that it was a revenue, handle, and profit loser for all and a downer for the customers indicated another rubber stamp approval.

The recent display of arrogance by the Chairman and the Vice Chairman of the CHRB at the September 22, 2010 meeting of the CHRB at Fairplex captured by Bill Christine in his article “Get out the Lifeboats” http://www.horseraceinsider.com/west...the-lifeboats/ indicates an attitude that is not in the best interest of horse racing in California.

For these reasons and more, and the downward trend line direction of the world’s greatest customer participation sport in California, we request a review of the CHRB actions from an independent state government oversight committee for obvious conflict of interest.

Roger Way
rwwupl is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 12-06-2010, 03:53 PM   #2
andymays
Veteran
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 9,908
Good job Roger.
andymays is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 12-06-2010, 04:24 PM   #3
Deepsix
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 434
Might we assume that this is the beginning of the 'war of words' that we'll hear as it relates to the Santa Anita Boycott scheduled for 12/26 (or there abouts)? Bad CHRB, bad Owners, bad Trainers, and bad Race Track Operators....... bad.
Deepsix is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 12-06-2010, 04:33 PM   #4
PaceAdvantage
PA Steward
 
PaceAdvantage's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Del Boca Vista
Posts: 88,450
Quote:
Originally Posted by Deepsix
Might we assume that this is the beginning of the 'war of words' that we'll hear as it relates to the Santa Anita Boycott scheduled for 12/26 (or there abouts)? Bad CHRB, bad Owners, bad Trainers, and bad Race Track Operators....... bad.
So nice to see you posting again Deepsix...
PaceAdvantage is online now   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 12-06-2010, 04:41 PM   #5
Deepsix
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 434
Hey Pace, nice to see you milling about, as well. The thing I find interesting is that Roger Way (Cal. West Coast HANA Rep) and HANA have been on opposite pages, here to fore, as it relates to boycotting SA. I then notice that Roger posted on the HANA topic but didn't identify himself as HANA representative.... ? Peculiar.

Anyway, nice keeping in touch.

Buhbye.
Deepsix is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 12-06-2010, 04:43 PM   #6
Greyfox
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 18,962
Roger Way put a lot of research and thought into that post. Well said.
Greyfox is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 12-06-2010, 05:05 PM   #7
andymays
Veteran
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 9,908
Quote:
Originally Posted by Deepsix
Hey Pace, nice to see you milling about, as well. The thing I find interesting is that Roger Way (Cal. West Coast HANA Rep) and HANA have been on opposite pages, here to fore, as it relates to boycotting SA. I then notice that Roger posted on the HANA topic but didn't identify himself as HANA representative.... ? Peculiar.

Anyway, nice keeping in touch.

Buhbye.
The email (same as the thread starter) went out with a huge HANA logo at the top.
andymays is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 12-06-2010, 09:54 PM   #8
Stillriledup
Veteran
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 25,607
Great stuff Rog!
Stillriledup is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 12-06-2010, 11:07 PM   #9
DeanT
Registered User
 
DeanT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Toronto
Posts: 4,962
Yep, really good job Roger!
DeanT is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 12-06-2010, 11:12 PM   #10
DJofSD
Screw PC
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 15,728
Kudos, Roger, kudos.

Maybe, just maybe, it's not too late to turn the ship around. At one time not that many years ago, California touted themselves as some of the best racing in the USA. It could be true again.
__________________
Truth sounds like hate to those who hate truth.
DJofSD is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 12-07-2010, 02:41 PM   #11
Charli125
Registered User
 
Charli125's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Sioux Falls, SD
Posts: 1,028
Well said Roger, and I'll confirm what Andy said. The email went out with a HANA logo on top.
Charli125 is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 12-07-2010, 06:37 PM   #12
rwwupl
Registered User
 
rwwupl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 1,085
Quote:
Originally Posted by Charli125
Well said Roger, and I'll confirm what Andy said. The email went out with a HANA logo on top.
I am informed that the Paulick Report will run it tomorrow, Andy brought it to his (Brad Cummings) attention. I will put Brad Cummings of Paulick Report on distribution in the future.

I hope you all can support it with comments.

Thanks, Roger Way

Last edited by rwwupl; 12-07-2010 at 06:40 PM.
rwwupl is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 12-07-2010, 06:39 PM   #13
andymays
Veteran
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 9,908
Quote:
Originally Posted by rwwupl
I am informed that the Paulick Report will run it tomorrow, Andy brought it to his attention. I will put Brad Cummings of Paulick Report on distribution in the future.

I hope you all can support it with comments.

Thanks, Roger Way
Let's hope they don't change their minds. You know how that works.
andymays is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 12-07-2010, 08:13 PM   #14
jelly
Veteran
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 832
Great job


In the future I would use 10-15% instead of 2-3%.
jelly is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 12-08-2010, 12:46 AM   #15
highnote
Registered User
 
highnote's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 10,861
Good stuff!
highnote is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Reply




Thread Tools
Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

» Advertisement
» Current Polls
Wh deserves to be the favorite? (last 4 figures)
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:34 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Copyright 1999 - 2023 -- PaceAdvantage.Com -- All Rights Reserved
We are a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program
designed to provide a means for us to earn fees by linking to Amazon.com and affiliated sites.