Horse Racing Forum - PaceAdvantage.Com - Horse Racing Message Board

Go Back   Horse Racing Forum - PaceAdvantage.Com - Horse Racing Message Board > Thoroughbred Horse Racing Discussion > General Racing Discussion


Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
Old 03-07-2018, 03:57 PM   #1
SG4
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Posts: 525
Rep Power: 4 SG4 is on a distinguished road
Bettor sues after winning horse has positive drug test

I think we've all had dreams of this scenario, here goes someone trying their hand at it. I figured it was an aggrieved type of degenerate (the likes of which you'd find here, in a positive way) but once seeing that PETA was behind this, I think that immediately shuts the door on getting behind this guy.

I have to think any legal types around here will agree this lawsuit is a zero-shot attempt & just a PETA play for bad PR against horse racing, anyone disagree?

http://www.drf.com/news/losing-betto...-positive-test
SG4 is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 03-07-2018, 04:36 PM   #2
airford1
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 139
Rep Power: 13 airford1 is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by SG4 View Post
I think we've all had dreams of this scenario, here goes someone trying their hand at it. I figured it was an aggrieved type of degenerate (the likes of which you'd find here, in a positive way) but once seeing that PETA was behind this, I think that immediately shuts the door on getting behind this guy.

I have to think any legal types around here will agree this lawsuit is a zero-shot attempt & just a PETA play for bad PR against horse racing, anyone disagree?

http://www.drf.com/news/losing-betto...-positive-test
So you make a LARGE wager and your horse finished 2ond and you find out that the winner was given a Milkshake and was able to out finish your horse. Seems to me that you have a case and the trainer of the winner might be the one having to pay, if all things were fair. Just saying it could happen one day.
airford1 is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 03-07-2018, 04:51 PM   #3
lamboguy
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Boston+Ocala
Posts: 18,332
Rep Power: 30 lamboguy has a spectacular aura aboutlamboguy has a spectacular aura about
Quote:
Originally Posted by airford1 View Post
So you make a LARGE wager and your horse finished 2ond and you find out that the winner was given a Milkshake and was able to out finish your horse. Seems to me that you have a case and the trainer of the winner might be the one having to pay, if all things were fair. Just saying it could happen one day.
its not worth suing for a $20 or $50 bill. but that being said there are plenty that use adw's that have records of all the bets they make. if someone were to follow up on bad test's and wait until he has a substantial amount of losses that were overturned due to bad test's, the trainers are race tracks might have to cough up some money. and then maybe the game would change.
lamboguy is online now   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 03-07-2018, 05:02 PM   #4
Tom
Registered User
 
Tom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Canandaigua, New york
Posts: 87,533
Rep Power: 113 Tom is a splendid one to beholdTom is a splendid one to beholdTom is a splendid one to beholdTom is a splendid one to beholdTom is a splendid one to beholdTom is a splendid one to beholdTom is a splendid one to behold
Why should a race track/owner/trainer be above the legal system? Making a bet in good faith and then having it taken away by specific illegal actions by a third party seems idea fodder for a damn nice lawsuit. Maye leading to a class action suit by all the people who were screwed by a low life cheater.
__________________
Who does the Racing Form Detective like in this one?
Tom is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 03-07-2018, 05:19 PM   #5
MONEY
Registered User
 
MONEY's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Houston Tx.
Posts: 2,160
Rep Power: 16 MONEY has a spectacular aura aboutMONEY has a spectacular aura about
Quote:
Originally Posted by lamboguy View Post
its not worth suing for a $20 or $50 bill. but that being said there are plenty that use adw's that have records of all the bets they make. if someone were to follow up on bad test's and wait until he has a substantial amount of losses that were overturned due to bad test's, the trainers are race tracks might have to cough up some money. and then maybe the game would change.
The real money is in "Punitive Damages" not actual loses.
__________________
Please don't kill the messenger.
MONEY is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 03-07-2018, 05:51 PM   #6
onefast99
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: NJ
Posts: 5,812
Rep Power: 16 onefast99 will become famous soon enough
Once the race is deemed final the payouts at the track are final as well. In the event a horse is then dq'd for testing positive it in no way affects the pari-mutuel system. On the other hand should those who had the winner give back their winnings?
__________________
Monmouth Park...keep racing in NJ!

Last edited by onefast99; 03-07-2018 at 05:52 PM.
onefast99 is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 03-07-2018, 06:02 PM   #7
lamboguy
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Boston+Ocala
Posts: 18,332
Rep Power: 30 lamboguy has a spectacular aura aboutlamboguy has a spectacular aura about
if a listed company misleads investors by leaving out vital information there are lawsuits and often times corporations lose the suits and have to cough up money. i don't see to much difference with pari-mutuel racing because basically the stock market and the pari-mutual markets operate the same way. the more demand for the shares of a stock the more the stockholder has to pay, the less demand the less they pay.
lamboguy is online now   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 03-07-2018, 06:48 PM   #8
jay68802
Registered User
 
jay68802's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Nebraska
Posts: 7,381
Rep Power: 24 jay68802 is a name known to alljay68802 is a name known to alljay68802 is a name known to alljay68802 is a name known to alljay68802 is a name known to alljay68802 is a name known to all
Quote:
Originally Posted by SG4 View Post
I think we've all had dreams of this scenario, here goes someone trying their hand at it. I figured it was an aggrieved type of degenerate (the likes of which you'd find here, in a positive way) but once seeing that PETA was behind this, I think that immediately shuts the door on getting behind this guy.

I have to think any legal types around here will agree this lawsuit is a zero-shot attempt & just a PETA play for bad PR against horse racing, anyone disagree?

http://www.drf.com/news/losing-betto...-positive-test
First of all, I resemble that remark. I wish him luck, because if he would win it would force horse racing to make some needed changes.
jay68802 is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 03-07-2018, 07:11 PM   #9
thaskalos
Loitering with Intent
 
thaskalos's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 21,335
Rep Power: 43 thaskalos is a splendid one to beholdthaskalos is a splendid one to beholdthaskalos is a splendid one to beholdthaskalos is a splendid one to beholdthaskalos is a splendid one to beholdthaskalos is a splendid one to beholdthaskalos is a splendid one to beholdthaskalos is a splendid one to behold
My bets have repeatedly run second to several of Karl Broberg's new acquisitions. I wonder if I too have a legal leg to stand on...
thaskalos is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 03-07-2018, 07:15 PM   #10
SG4
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Posts: 525
Rep Power: 4 SG4 is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by onefast99 View Post
On the other hand should those who had the winner give back their winnings?
This is the point as to why nothing will be affected. If you're on the flip side & won a lot of money with a horse who happened to be on the juice, I don't think there will be a line of people looking to return their ill-gotten gains. Without those winnings returned, if you sued a trainer for all the "winning" bets which weren't when there's a positive test, that'd pretty much bankrupt any individual involved.
SG4 is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 03-07-2018, 08:12 PM   #11
baconswitchfarm
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 654
Rep Power: 12 baconswitchfarm will become famous soon enoughbaconswitchfarm will become famous soon enough
Quote:
Originally Posted by SG4 View Post
if you sued a trainer for all the "winning" bets which weren't when there's a positive test, that'd pretty much bankrupt any individual involved.


yes.
baconswitchfarm is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 03-07-2018, 08:15 PM   #12
Afleet
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Posts: 984
Rep Power: 5 Afleet will become famous soon enoughAfleet will become famous soon enough
Quote:
Originally Posted by thaskalos View Post
My bets have repeatedly run second to several of Karl Broberg's new acquisitions. I wonder if I too have a legal leg to stand on...
call the ACLU, they have sued for crazier things
Afleet is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 03-07-2018, 10:09 PM   #13
woodbinepmi
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Baton Rouge, La
Posts: 1,013
Rep Power: 9 woodbinepmi will become famous soon enough
Quote:
Originally Posted by thaskalos View Post
My bets have repeatedly run second to several of Karl Broberg's new acquisitions. I wonder if I too have a legal leg to stand on...
I like that, good one.
__________________
@ShaTinRacing
woodbinepmi is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 03-07-2018, 11:38 PM   #14
DGroundhog
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Posts: 63
Rep Power: 1 DGroundhog is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by onefast99 View Post
Once the race is deemed final the payouts at the track are final as well. In the event a horse is then dq'd for testing positive it in no way affects the pari-mutuel system. On the other hand should those who had the winner give back their winnings?
Depending on the state and what exactly occurred there may be exceptions.
DGroundhog is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 03-08-2018, 01:53 AM   #15
luisbe
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 305
Rep Power: 10 luisbe is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tom View Post
Why should a race track/owner/trainer be above the legal system? Making a bet in good faith and then having it taken away by specific illegal actions by a third party seems idea fodder for a damn nice lawsuit. Maye leading to a class action suit by all the people who were screwed by a low life cheater.
The "milk shaker" might have bet on the horse and pocketed more money than just 10% of the purse, and...if he/she is not the owner.
luisbe is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Reply




Thread Tools
Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

» Advertisement
» Current Polls
What is your most successful handicapping trait/tool?
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:54 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2018, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Copyright 1999 - 2018 -- PaceAdvantage.Com -- All Rights Reserved -- Best Viewed in a modern browser @ 1280x720 Resolution Or Higher
We are a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program
designed to provide a means for us to earn fees by linking to Amazon.com and affiliated sites.