Horse Racing Forum - PaceAdvantage.Com - Horse Racing Message Board

Go Back   Horse Racing Forum - PaceAdvantage.Com - Horse Racing Message Board > Off Topic > Off Topic - Sports


Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
Old 03-04-2018, 05:04 PM   #1
LemonSoupKid
Registered User
 
LemonSoupKid's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 647
Rep Power: 0 LemonSoupKid has a little shameless behaviour in the past
The irony and joke of leagues asking for a bit of the sports betting action, now

Have you guys seen these appeals by Silver or Manfred to get such things as "integrity fees"? What does betting on games have to do with you, something you've paid lawyers years for in order to keep down or quash. You just provide a product, and it gets great cable deals, advertisements, sells tickets, merchandises, etc. What others do as a sideshow on their time has nothing to do with you.

Now you want some of the action when you realize the jig is up? Why would any state even consider this? It's an embarrassment and a joke that these clowns (though I'm not surprised) are trying to do this.

As a measure of good will, why don't you first build your own stadiums. Or better yet, start first by paying back the tax payer for building it for you.

I find this insulting. I'd tell Silver or Manfred to go you know what
LemonSoupKid is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 03-04-2018, 06:48 PM   #2
horses4courses
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 11,747
Rep Power: 21 horses4courses is on a distinguished road
Reality Check

A bit of the action?

I hear the number 1% being mentioned.
That would be around 33% of theoretical profit.
Before any government take out.

There is much negotiating to be done
before any new legal betting takes place.
horses4courses is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 03-06-2018, 03:24 PM   #3
Valuist
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: East Bay
Posts: 16,100
Rep Power: 33 Valuist will become famous soon enoughValuist will become famous soon enough
About 20% of the profit, but still ridiculous.

Nothing more than a money grab from a couple of parasites. Adam Silver should thank God for gambling; how many people would watch that God awful 82 game regular season if not for gambling?
Valuist is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 03-06-2018, 03:48 PM   #4
cj
@TimeformUSfigs
 
cj's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Moore, OK
Posts: 41,478
Rep Power: 64 cj is a splendid one to beholdcj is a splendid one to beholdcj is a splendid one to beholdcj is a splendid one to beholdcj is a splendid one to beholdcj is a splendid one to behold
The leagues have every right to make money since they are the ones putting on the show. How much is what is up for debate.
cj is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 03-06-2018, 04:22 PM   #5
thaskalos
Loitering with Intent
 
thaskalos's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 21,326
Rep Power: 43 thaskalos is a splendid one to beholdthaskalos is a splendid one to beholdthaskalos is a splendid one to beholdthaskalos is a splendid one to beholdthaskalos is a splendid one to beholdthaskalos is a splendid one to beholdthaskalos is a splendid one to beholdthaskalos is a splendid one to behold
The leagues will get their money...and so will the bookmakers. The bettors have enough money to cover all the "costs of doing business". Does anybody really think that the impending "legalized sports betting" will be a 110-100 wagering proposition? It will be 115-100 at the MINIMUM.
__________________
"History would be a wonderful thing...if it were only true."
-- Leo Tolstoy
thaskalos is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 03-06-2018, 04:29 PM   #6
LemonSoupKid
Registered User
 
LemonSoupKid's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 647
Rep Power: 0 LemonSoupKid has a little shameless behaviour in the past
Quote:
Originally Posted by cj View Post
The leagues have every right to make money since they are the ones putting on the show. How much is what is up for debate.
No they don't, otherwise they wouldn't be asking (they'd be doing) and for that matter, in a childish and horribly unconvincing way.

They have their leagues and make/pay their large sums due to the demand for their product via tickets, marketing, merchandise, etc. They sued for years to NOT allow gambling and now they should get some of the action because they lost the ability to stop others from something they knew they couldn't ever get?

And the obvious secret (as you should know) why they can't get it is because by definition, when you have a pro sports league, you can't make money on gambling as the sole sponsor or proprietor. Due to integrity it would never make sense, and is an industry fact, thus why you can only hope that others will listen to your insulting arguments about "integrity fees" or royalties when you have absolutely no right or legal backing to get them. Shouldn't you already be making sure your game has integrity? It's laughable.

What I do with someone else regarding your game has nothing to do with you except that you have this illusion that you should be involved. But you shouldn't and you can't, as I have shown. What's more, gambling actually helps you, you greedy bastards, by increasing excitement and fanfare.

I've lost a lot of respect for this totally lame cash grab by NBA and MLB. They should and will get precisely ZERO of the action, unless the states that soon to go bust by adopting this are that corrupt, or that stupid.
LemonSoupKid is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 03-06-2018, 04:31 PM   #7
LemonSoupKid
Registered User
 
LemonSoupKid's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 647
Rep Power: 0 LemonSoupKid has a little shameless behaviour in the past
Quote:
Originally Posted by thaskalos View Post
The leagues will get their money...and so will the bookmakers. The bettors have enough money to cover all the "costs of doing business". Does anybody really think that the impending "legalized sports betting" will be a 110-100 wagering proposition? It will be 115-100 at the MINIMUM.
The States will almost instantly fail if they do that then.

With that increase in edge AND the fact that bets are tracked and you are taxed (unlike with locals) who would ever play a -115 or higher average wager?

I think they'll try this but soon see you get very little profit, if any.
LemonSoupKid is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 03-06-2018, 04:55 PM   #8
jay68802
Registered User
 
jay68802's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Nebraska
Posts: 7,373
Rep Power: 24 jay68802 is a name known to alljay68802 is a name known to alljay68802 is a name known to alljay68802 is a name known to alljay68802 is a name known to alljay68802 is a name known to all
Quote:
Originally Posted by LemonSoupKid View Post
With that increase in edge AND the fact that bets are tracked and you are taxed (unlike with locals) who would ever play a -115 or higher average wager?
Handicapper's?
jay68802 is online now   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 03-06-2018, 05:59 PM   #9
Valuist
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: East Bay
Posts: 16,100
Rep Power: 33 Valuist will become famous soon enoughValuist will become famous soon enough
Quote:
Originally Posted by jay68802 View Post
Handicapper's?
Not for very long. The offshores will continue to flourish.

The only ones who would bet minus 120 are those who don't know the math involved.

Minus 120 sides/totals is NOT a beatable game.

Last edited by Valuist; 03-06-2018 at 06:01 PM.
Valuist is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 03-06-2018, 07:31 PM   #10
thaskalos
Loitering with Intent
 
thaskalos's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 21,326
Rep Power: 43 thaskalos is a splendid one to beholdthaskalos is a splendid one to beholdthaskalos is a splendid one to beholdthaskalos is a splendid one to beholdthaskalos is a splendid one to beholdthaskalos is a splendid one to beholdthaskalos is a splendid one to beholdthaskalos is a splendid one to behold
Quote:
Originally Posted by Valuist View Post
Not for very long. The offshores will continue to flourish.

The only ones who would bet minus 120 are those who don't know the math involved.

Minus 120 sides/totals is NOT a beatable game.
Since when has the state shown an interest in offering "beatable games"?
__________________
"History would be a wonderful thing...if it were only true."
-- Leo Tolstoy
thaskalos is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 03-06-2018, 09:40 PM   #11
horses4courses
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 11,747
Rep Power: 21 horses4courses is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by Valuist View Post
About 20% of the profit, but still ridiculous.

Nothing more than a money grab from a couple of parasites. Adam Silver should thank God for gambling; how many people would watch that God awful 82 game regular season if not for gambling?

How do you figure 20%?
Theoretical hold on sports wagering is not much over 3%.
horses4courses is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 03-06-2018, 09:44 PM   #12
horses4courses
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 11,747
Rep Power: 21 horses4courses is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by Valuist View Post
The offshores will continue to flourish.
I agree with that - at least in the short run.
The main reason will be phone and online wagering.
Solely bricks and mortar operations will not cut it.
horses4courses is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 03-06-2018, 10:45 PM   #13
oughtoh
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2017
Posts: 582
Rep Power: 0 oughtoh is an unknown quantity at this point
So if MLB takes money from gambling bets, then Pete Rose should go into the HOF
oughtoh is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 03-07-2018, 02:27 AM   #14
jay68802
Registered User
 
jay68802's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Nebraska
Posts: 7,373
Rep Power: 24 jay68802 is a name known to alljay68802 is a name known to alljay68802 is a name known to alljay68802 is a name known to alljay68802 is a name known to alljay68802 is a name known to all
Quote:
Originally Posted by oughtoh View Post
So if MLB takes money from gambling bets, then Pete Rose should go into the HOF
jay68802 is online now   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 03-07-2018, 02:42 AM   #15
jay68802
Registered User
 
jay68802's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Nebraska
Posts: 7,373
Rep Power: 24 jay68802 is a name known to alljay68802 is a name known to alljay68802 is a name known to alljay68802 is a name known to alljay68802 is a name known to alljay68802 is a name known to all
Quote:
Originally Posted by Valuist View Post
Not for very long. The offshores will continue to flourish.

The only ones who would bet minus 120 are those who don't know the math involved.

Minus 120 sides/totals is NOT a beatable game.
My point is that handicappers are forced to bet into 20% + take out pools and still bet. Professional sports wants a cut of the $? Just like tracks want to get a cut of casino money. And if a track gets sports wagering, the local HBPA will want a cut of the $ also. Every time the $ get divided up, the bettor is going to be the one that pays for it.
jay68802 is online now   Reply With Quote Reply
Reply




Thread Tools
Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

» Advertisement
» Current Polls
Which handicapping software has given you the best ROI?
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:31 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2018, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Copyright 1999 - 2018 -- PaceAdvantage.Com -- All Rights Reserved -- Best Viewed in a modern browser @ 1280x720 Resolution Or Higher
We are a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program
designed to provide a means for us to earn fees by linking to Amazon.com and affiliated sites.