Horse Racing Forum - PaceAdvantage.Com - Horse Racing Message Board

Go Back   Horse Racing Forum - PaceAdvantage.Com - Horse Racing Message Board > Thoroughbred Horse Racing Discussion > General Handicapping Discussion


Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
Old 02-25-2018, 01:45 PM   #1
ultracapper
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Seattle
Posts: 2,950
Rep Power: 8 ultracapper is on a distinguished road
SA Hill

I'm kinda embarrassed to ask this question because I really should have known the answer 15 years ago, but...

The 3rd fraction down the hill.....is that for 6 furlongs, or for 1/16th from home?

It's either 1/4 mile from 2nd call to 3rd call, or 1/16th from 3rd call to finish, but it can't be both like 6 1/2 furlong races usually are because the race is an "about".

Thanks to those that can clarify.
ultracapper is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 02-25-2018, 02:38 PM   #2
storyline
Registered User
 
storyline's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2017
Posts: 131
Rep Power: 0 storyline is an unknown quantity at this point
Quote:
Originally Posted by ultracapper View Post
I'm kinda embarrassed to ask this question because I really should have known the answer 15 years ago, but...

The 3rd fraction down the hill.....is that for 6 furlongs, or for 1/16th from home?

It's either 1/4 mile from 2nd call to 3rd call, or 1/16th from 3rd call to finish, but it can't be both like 6 1/2 furlong races usually are because the race is an "about".

Thanks to those that can clarify.
I think this may help answer your question UCapper

6.5 furlong distance

The first 1320 ft is the 1st fraction (2f mark)

The next 1320 ft is the 2nd fraction (4f mark)

The remaining 1650 ft are calculated as the 3rd fraction..

Last edited by storyline; 02-25-2018 at 02:40 PM.
storyline is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 02-25-2018, 04:33 PM   #3
Tom
Registered User
 
Tom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Canandaigua, New york
Posts: 89,553
Rep Power: 117 Tom has much to be proud ofTom has much to be proud ofTom has much to be proud ofTom has much to be proud ofTom has much to be proud ofTom has much to be proud ofTom has much to be proud ofTom has much to be proud of
It will be the time from 2nd call to finish.
Probably incorrect, but that is it.

From 2/24 - this is the last 6.5T race - 3rd fraction is 28.38
__________________
Who does the Racing Form Detective like in this one?

Last edited by Tom; 02-25-2018 at 04:36 PM.
Tom is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 02-25-2018, 05:00 PM   #4
ultracapper
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Seattle
Posts: 2,950
Rep Power: 8 ultracapper is on a distinguished road
Thanks gentlemen, but there are 4 points of call and 4 splits for the hillside course (in the DRF anyhow). The points of calls don't really concern me much, but the clocking of that 3rd split is something I'd like to be clear on. That 3rd split is either a little short of a 1/4 mile from the 2nd split, or the 4th split (Final time) is a little short of 1/16th from the 3rd split. One of them has to be short of the traditional 6 1/2 furlong splits to account for the shorter distance of the hillside course.

Am I thinking straight here? I think I am.

Last edited by ultracapper; 02-25-2018 at 05:01 PM.
ultracapper is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 02-25-2018, 05:09 PM   #5
cj
@TimeformUSfigs
 
cj's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Moore, OK
Posts: 41,849
Rep Power: 66 cj is a splendid one to beholdcj is a splendid one to beholdcj is a splendid one to beholdcj is a splendid one to beholdcj is a splendid one to beholdcj is a splendid one to beholdcj is a splendid one to behold
The poles are supposed to be set up to time the fractions for the exact distance, so it should be for 6f. Whether they actually are or not is anyone's guess. Have you tried looking for the timing equipment at that point?
cj is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 02-25-2018, 05:28 PM   #6
storyline
Registered User
 
storyline's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2017
Posts: 131
Rep Power: 0 storyline is an unknown quantity at this point
Quote:
Originally Posted by ultracapper View Post
Thanks gentlemen, but there are 4 points of call and 4 splits for the hillside course (in the DRF anyhow). The points of calls don't really concern me much, but the clocking of that 3rd split is something I'd like to be clear on. That 3rd split is either a little short of a 1/4 mile from the 2nd split, or the 4th split (Final time) is a little short of 1/16th from the 3rd split. One of them has to be short of the traditional 6 1/2 furlong splits to account for the shorter distance of the hillside course.

Am I thinking straight here? I think I am.


Incremental splits for the downhill might look like this..

(2f ) 22.0
(4f) 22.5
(6f) 24.0
(6.5f) 6.0


These are the incremental splits and 3rd fraction is something described above.

It's very possible I'm not understanding your question.
storyline is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 02-25-2018, 07:56 PM   #7
Tom
Registered User
 
Tom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Canandaigua, New york
Posts: 89,553
Rep Power: 117 Tom has much to be proud ofTom has much to be proud ofTom has much to be proud ofTom has much to be proud ofTom has much to be proud ofTom has much to be proud ofTom has much to be proud ofTom has much to be proud of
I thought you meant the 3rd fraction - aka final fraction.
__________________
Who does the Racing Form Detective like in this one?
Tom is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 02-25-2018, 09:36 PM   #8
ultracapper
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Seattle
Posts: 2,950
Rep Power: 8 ultracapper is on a distinguished road
3rd point of timing. 3rd split.

I'm under the impression that the downhill course is short of 6 1/2 furlongs, so I'm trying to determine between which points of timing the missing yardage is. I have tried to see where the timing mechanisms are in the stretch, but can't identify it.

Sorry to run you guys through the ringer. I do appreciate your efforts. If I was a bit more articulate we'd probably be done with this.

21.47 43.59 1:06.12 1:12.18

The highlighted one. Is that exactly 2 furlongs from the 43.59, or is it 1/16 from the 1:12.18. One of them has to be short to make up for the yardage that the race is shorter than 6 1/2 furlongs. Of course, I'm assuming that the 1st split is 1/4 mile and the 2nd split is 1/2 mile and that the missing yardage is somewhere in the yardage in the stretch. But, the missing yardage could be from the gate to the first split, I'm just not sure.

Thank you.

P.S. The more I think about it, the more it makes sense that the missing yardage is at the top of the hill. There's already a timer at the 1/16th pole, another at 5/16ths and another at 9/16ths, so it has to be from the gate to the first split. That's it. It has to be. Whatever the difference between 6 1/2 furlongs and the true distance of the downhill race has to be at the start. Then they just hit the timers at the poles.

Gotta be it. Thanks for being there while I talk to myself. I love this board. Gotta go get a paypal.
ultracapper is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 02-26-2018, 09:53 AM   #9
cj
@TimeformUSfigs
 
cj's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Moore, OK
Posts: 41,849
Rep Power: 66 cj is a splendid one to beholdcj is a splendid one to beholdcj is a splendid one to beholdcj is a splendid one to beholdcj is a splendid one to beholdcj is a splendid one to beholdcj is a splendid one to behold
Just curious, what makes you think the "about" distance is short of 6.5f?
cj is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 02-26-2018, 11:31 AM   #10
jay68802
Registered User
 
jay68802's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Nebraska
Posts: 7,939
Rep Power: 25 jay68802 is a splendid one to beholdjay68802 is a splendid one to beholdjay68802 is a splendid one to beholdjay68802 is a splendid one to beholdjay68802 is a splendid one to beholdjay68802 is a splendid one to beholdjay68802 is a splendid one to behold
I think the splits are normal, the time difference is that the 3rd and last split are run on the flat part of the course.
jay68802 is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 02-26-2018, 11:35 AM   #11
ubercapper
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 481
Rep Power: 13 ubercapper will become famous soon enoughubercapper will become famous soon enough
Fractional times chart:

http://www.equibase.com/newfan/fractional_times.cfm
ubercapper is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 02-26-2018, 04:28 PM   #12
SG4
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Posts: 568
Rep Power: 4 SG4 will become famous soon enough
Quote:
Originally Posted by cj View Post
Just curious, what makes you think the "about" distance is short of 6.5f?
6.4022 furlongs as per this recent article - http://www.latimes.com/sports/more/l...702-story.html


This is an interesting thread, I always assumed the final 1/16th is where the difference lied, but considering the timing poles being where they are, it probably is the first quarter coming up a tad faster than it really is.
SG4 is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 02-26-2018, 07:36 PM   #13
kingfin66
Bombardier
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 3,549
Rep Power: 20 kingfin66 has a spectacular aura aboutkingfin66 has a spectacular aura about
Thanks for sharing the article. It was nice to read about the history of their signature race. 6.4022. I always figured that the times were so fast because they were running downhill. That is definitely some of it, but is some of it also because the splits are a little short?
__________________
Very little is needed to make a happy life; it is all within yourself, in your way of thinking. -Marcus Aurelius
kingfin66 is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 02-27-2018, 10:15 PM   #14
cj
@TimeformUSfigs
 
cj's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Moore, OK
Posts: 41,849
Rep Power: 66 cj is a splendid one to beholdcj is a splendid one to beholdcj is a splendid one to beholdcj is a splendid one to beholdcj is a splendid one to beholdcj is a splendid one to beholdcj is a splendid one to behold
Quote:
Originally Posted by SG4 View Post
6.4022 furlongs as per this recent article - http://www.latimes.com/sports/more/l...702-story.html


This is an interesting thread, I always assumed the final 1/16th is where the difference lied, but considering the timing poles being where they are, it probably is the first quarter coming up a tad faster than it really is.
In this case Santa Anita now uses Trakus as the official timer so the poles don't really mean anything, just a visual. The fractions should all be for the exact distance. Should be easy to figure out from the charts and how many feet they record for each segment.
cj is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 02-27-2018, 10:25 PM   #15
cj
@TimeformUSfigs
 
cj's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Moore, OK
Posts: 41,849
Rep Power: 66 cj is a splendid one to beholdcj is a splendid one to beholdcj is a splendid one to beholdcj is a splendid one to beholdcj is a splendid one to beholdcj is a splendid one to beholdcj is a splendid one to behold
Quote:
Originally Posted by cj View Post
In this case Santa Anita now uses Trakus as the official timer so the poles don't really mean anything, just a visual. The fractions should all be for the exact distance. Should be easy to figure out from the charts and how many feet they record for each segment.
So, I pulled up Race 7 from Sunday:

This is the minimum distance run at each segment. One note, Trakus had a built in error of adding an additional ~3.5 feet per furlong.

1/4 1329 feet (This is about 2 feet more than expected, so no distance shaved here)

1/2 1342 feet (This is about about 15 feet more than expected, but given that it is on the weird layout, probably makes sense, doubt it is possible to save ground going right and then left)

3/4 1332 feet (Only about five feet above minimum)

Last 1/16 331 feet (This is slightly less than the expected minimum of 332)

Based on this, I'd guess the distance is shaved off the very last segment.

For the total race, minimum distance traveled was 4350 feet from an expected minimum of 4313. I'm guessing that at 6.5 given the odd layout the 4313 is impossible to achieve as you'll either lose ground going right or going left, one or the other.
cj is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Reply




Thread Tools
Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

» Advertisement
» Current Polls
Reason for drop off...
More computer programs are 'playing' - 18.00%
9 Votes
An unknown or undetectable drug is in use. - 8.00%
4 Votes
Loss of fresh money in pools (only seasoned players left) - 62.00%
31 Votes
Other - 12.00%
6 Votes
Total Votes: 50
This poll is closed.
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:33 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2018, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Copyright 1999 - 2018 -- PaceAdvantage.Com -- All Rights Reserved -- Best Viewed in a modern browser @ 1280x720 Resolution Or Higher
We are a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program
designed to provide a means for us to earn fees by linking to Amazon.com and affiliated sites.