Horse Racing Forum - PaceAdvantage.Com - Horse Racing Message Board

Go Back   Horse Racing Forum - PaceAdvantage.Com - Horse Racing Message Board > Thoroughbred Horse Racing Discussion > General Racing Discussion


Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
Old 12-01-2017, 11:18 PM   #1
dilanesp
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 8,798
new SA race conditions

http://www.santaanita.com/press-rele.../#.WiHx67pFxPY
dilanesp is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 12-02-2017, 01:25 AM   #2
BrentT
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2017
Posts: 75
Thats great news. They need to do something to help the smaller barns, or racing will be gone
BrentT is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 12-02-2017, 06:25 AM   #3
lamboguy
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Boston+Ocala
Posts: 23,728
its the smartest move i have seen racing make ever. its a way to re-organize the game without shutting down completely.
lamboguy is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 12-02-2017, 12:24 PM   #4
GMB@BP
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Dark Side of the Moon
Posts: 5,870
I am unsure how this will work out, I can see some other issues.

But trying something new is probably better than doing nothing.

What about homebreds? most of them are not high class and have the same issues.
GMB@BP is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 12-02-2017, 01:13 PM   #5
elhelmete
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 1,735
I like this and it helps explain, I think, something I thought I've been seeing since Ritvo came west: trainers who I rarely see filling the entry box. He must have promised the little guys some help if they help first.
elhelmete is online now   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 12-02-2017, 01:39 PM   #6
cj
@TimeformUSfigs
 
cj's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Moore, OK
Posts: 46,825
Restricting races generally results in smaller field sizes, not bigger. We'll see I guess.
cj is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 12-02-2017, 03:04 PM   #7
biggestal99
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Posts: 4,520
Quote:
Originally Posted by cj View Post
Restricting races generally results in smaller field sizes, not bigger. We'll see I guess.
Maiden auctions do well in the uk. Drawing large fields.

Wonder if it will work with less of a horse population to draw from.

Allan
biggestal99 is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 12-02-2017, 03:07 PM   #8
GMB@BP
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Dark Side of the Moon
Posts: 5,870
Quote:
Originally Posted by cj View Post
Restricting races generally results in smaller field sizes, not bigger. We'll see I guess.
I agree, and the regular mdn races are going to have 4-5 entries.
GMB@BP is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 12-02-2017, 03:41 PM   #9
dilanesp
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 8,798
Quote:
Originally Posted by GMB@BP View Post
I agree, and the regular mdn races are going to have 4-5 entries.
So they will be just like our stakes races then. 5 entries, all trained by Baffert.
dilanesp is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 12-02-2017, 08:00 PM   #10
Prioress Ply
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2017
Posts: 83
Big FU to Baffert. Let's see if they continue to write special Allowance and overnight stakes races for him too. Maybe not. Love it.
Prioress Ply is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 12-02-2017, 08:21 PM   #11
JustRalph
Just another Facist
 
JustRalph's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Now in Houston
Posts: 52,759
Quote:
Originally Posted by cj View Post
Restricting races generally results in smaller field sizes, not bigger. We'll see I guess.
First thing I thought of....

It’s at least 3 years too late
__________________
WE ARE THE DUMBEST COUNTRY ON THE PLANET!
JustRalph is online now   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 12-03-2017, 10:40 AM   #12
Fager Fan
Veteran
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 5,222
Quote:
Originally Posted by JustRalph View Post
First thing I thought of....

It’s at least 3 years too late
Ditto, but you'd also think the racing secretary has his ear to the ground well enough to know the population, the complaints, and what the probable results would be here. That said, it seems like welfare for lower level horses that doesn't strike me right, but I'm also for new conditions that allows for more protections than claiming races offer. If some small outfit adores their horse and doesn't want to lose it, why can't there be conditions for low level horses that don't allow for claiming? It's not hard to restrict based on speed figures and similar.
Fager Fan is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 12-03-2017, 01:16 PM   #13
linrom1
Veteran
 
linrom1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 980
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fager Fan View Post
Ditto, but you'd also think the racing secretary has his ear to the ground well enough to know the population, the complaints, and what the probable results would be here. That said, it seems like welfare for lower level horses that doesn't strike me right, but I'm also for new conditions that allows for more protections than claiming races offer. If some small outfit adores their horse and doesn't want to lose it, why can't there be conditions for low level horses that don't allow for claiming? It's not hard to restrict based on speed figures and similar.
And Rick Hammerle though this up? The racing secretary who screwed up Santa Anita stakes schedules beyond redemption and can't card a race card.

This is nothing more than a way to screw the bettor even more to the advantage of insiders. Some homebreds can easily fetch millions of dollars if their owners were willing to part with their favorite pets(but we don't know this), and now they will run exclusively against completely outclassed stock?
linrom1 is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 12-03-2017, 01:17 PM   #14
theiman
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 355
For DM's last week of racing these were the trainers who had horses in the $20K claimers or less fields.

11/24 $20K Claimer
D'Amato
Truman
Hess Jr
Blacker
Sadler
Miller
Lopez, Juan
Desormeaux
Only Lopez would qualify.

Mdn $20K Claimer
Hollendorfer
Miller
Sayler
Hess Jr
Freeman
Truman
Garcia, Antonio
Harrington, Patricia
McCarthy
Herrick
Cassidy

Sayler, Harrington and Herrick would qualify

11/25/17

$12,500 Claimer
Kornier
Gonzalez
Spawr
Hess Jr
Metz
Lobo
Truman
Stute, G

Only Lobo would qualify

$16K Claimer
Spawr
Hess Jr
Blacker
Sierra, J.
Souza F
Hollendorfer
Bonde
Glatt

Only Souza would qualify

11/26/17

$20K Claimer
Miller
Puype
Hess Jr
Knapp
Yakteen
D'Amato
Hess Jr
Glatt

None would qualify

Looks to me like there wont be many to fill these conditions(although this is a small sample and I am sure if you did it for some of the Los Al entries the #'s might go up some.)
The idea to help the small guy is fine. The question is do you have the inventory to fill the fields, or are you looking to attract small stables from GG or Turf Paradise
theiman is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 12-03-2017, 01:22 PM   #15
classhandicapper
Registered User
 
classhandicapper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Queens, NY
Posts: 20,597
The MSW restriction is interesting. The second tier of MSW horses doesn't have much of a shot against the very best bred horses from the best barns. So you sort of have to get beat up for awhile until they all graduate or drop into maiden claiming before you really know what you have. This will split the division into 2 classes. I'm not sure how that helps the field sizes unless a lot of those second tier horses were just sitting in the barn, but it's giving some of the smaller owners and trainers a better chance to win without dropping into the claiming ranks.
__________________
"Unlearning is the highest form of learning"
classhandicapper is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Reply




Thread Tools
Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

» Advertisement
» Current Polls
Wh deserves to be the favorite? (last 4 figures)
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:21 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Copyright 1999 - 2023 -- PaceAdvantage.Com -- All Rights Reserved
We are a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program
designed to provide a means for us to earn fees by linking to Amazon.com and affiliated sites.