Assange suggests DNC informant was murdered

[chadk66]

Originally Posted by classhandicapper

Wkileaks tweeted this on 1/19.

>>WikiLeaksVerified account
‏@wikileaks

Following
More
Reward for the killers of Seth Rich is now $130,000<<



Gee, I wonder why Wikileaks remains so determined to find the killer(s) of Seth Rich? With all the significant issues in the world Wikileaks is still worried about the "robbery" of someone none of us ever heard of. He was only the data director at the "DNC" right around the time of the DNC leaks. hmmmn

not hard to understand what's going on or went on

[davew]

Originally Posted by highnote

Maybe it was the Russians? After all, they're being accused of hacking into the DNC emails. If the 27 year old was helping the Russians, maybe he knew too much and they were worried about him talking?

What a tangled web of intrigue we weave.

You are probably on to something there, at least 17 national security agencies say it was the Russians that interfered with the elections.

[classhandicapper]

Originally Posted by chadk66

not hard to understand what's going on or went on

I would say the probability that Seth Rich was a Wikileaks informant is around 75%. That would be my fair odds lines. It would not shock me if some patsy shows up eventually to kill the story.

[classhandicapper]

Originally Posted by davew

You are probably on to something there, at least 17 national security agencies say it was the Russians that interfered with the elections.

The problem with that theory is that democrats say it was Russia that did the hacking and gave the information to Wikileaks. They believe Assange is working with Russia. If Russia killed him, the last thing Assange and Wikileaks would be doing is keeping the story alive. Way more likely is that he was leaking info to Wikileaks (and perhaps even Russia) and someone had him killed.

[EasyGoer89]

Originally Posted by classhandicapper

The problem with that theory is that democrats say it was Russia that did the hacking and gave the information to Wikileaks. They believe Assange is working with Russia. If Russia killed him, the last thing Assange and Wikileaks would be doing is keeping the story alive. Way more likely is that he was leaking info to Wikileaks (and perhaps even Russia) and someone had him killed.

People born last night believe a much different story than the smart people.

[JustRalph]

Originally Posted by davew

You are probably on to something there, at least 17 national security agencies say it was the Russians that interfered with the elections.

How long are we going to have to put up with this bullshit?

All the hackers did was release the truth. Not one of the emails has been discredited. In fact many have been verified via the google algorithm used in gmail.

The Dems rigged the election for Hill over Bernie. Then ran a shit campaign.

Get over it

[Tom]

Hear! Hear!

All the whining and crying is embarrassing.
The TRUTH was revealed.

That is not a bad thing.
The DNC is the bad thing.

And those Nazi Woman in DC this weekend.

[rastajenk]

Originally Posted by JustRalph

The Dems rigged the election for Hill over Bernie. Then ran a shit campaign.

Get over it

I think you missed dave's tongue-in-cheek sarcasm. It's easy to do, he's very subtle about it. But still, he's got 4900 posts, some of has to have dripped through.

[highnote]

Originally Posted by classhandicapper

The problem with that theory is that democrats say it was Russia that did the hacking and gave the information to Wikileaks. They believe Assange is working with Russia. If Russia killed him, the last thing Assange and Wikileaks would be doing is keeping the story alive. Way more likely is that he was leaking info to Wikileaks (and perhaps even Russia) and someone had him killed.

A common strategy is accusing your opponents of doing the same things that you're doing.