Horse Racing Forum - PaceAdvantage.Com - Horse Racing Message Board

Go Back   Horse Racing Forum - PaceAdvantage.Com - Horse Racing Message Board > Thoroughbred Horse Racing Discussion > General Racing Discussion


Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
Old 07-23-2016, 06:06 AM   #46
outofthebox
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 647
Quote:
Originally Posted by cj
To my knowledge he hasn't said anything. I assume the horse will be examined and that will be used for or against him. We'll see. What I am saying is if a horse has so many issues that it is possible it can't be ridden from start to finish the horse shouldn't be racing. The sport needs to do better.
I agree with you here, CJ. But unfortunately this is how the bad side of our game works. There are just to many situations where a trainer/owner are dumping one horses problems hopefully off to another via claim. Many times horses are injected and blocked for this purpose with no thought of either horse or jockeys lives on the line. The last thing on there mind is the betting public.Yes pathetic. The part that confuses me is the agent/rider accepting this mount after a dismal effort and the plunge to the bottom. What kind of story could the trainer have given him to ensure confidence that the horse was ok and to be ridden confidently. Whole thing looks bad, but i think it will be blown over without much repercussion.
outofthebox is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 07-23-2016, 08:57 AM   #47
chadk66
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Posts: 5,414
odds are there is nothing physically wrong with the horse. simply mental. extremely green and numerous things he/she didn't like in that race.
chadk66 is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 07-23-2016, 11:16 AM   #48
davew
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 22,639
Quote:
Originally Posted by chadk66
odds are there is nothing physically wrong with the horse. simply mental. extremely green and numerous things he/she didn't like in that race.

The head-on shows a different story and I feel exonerates the jockey. The break had the 1 veering out pinching back the 2, causing the poor start. At the top od the stretch, Tizthedream was running well and looked like it could get 2nd or win, but then something happened. In the last 100 yards, the horse carriage changed and veered out about 8 lanes - possibly left front leg.

Would the stewards also call in a jockey who was in the hospital because the horse they were riding broke down at the finish line?
davew is online now   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 07-23-2016, 01:14 PM   #49
Not4Love
not4love
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 629
Shoot Craps

1st out was Pulled by Castanon. Second start goes to belmont and wins breaking the track record for 6f on the Turf. Still holds the record!
__________________
Not4Love
Not4Love is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 07-23-2016, 01:36 PM   #50
chadk66
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Posts: 5,414
Quote:
Originally Posted by davew
The head-on shows a different story and I feel exonerates the jockey. The break had the 1 veering out pinching back the 2, causing the poor start. At the top od the stretch, Tizthedream was running well and looked like it could get 2nd or win, but then something happened. In the last 100 yards, the horse carriage changed and veered out about 8 lanes - possibly left front leg.

Would the stewards also call in a jockey who was in the hospital because the horse they were riding broke down at the finish line?
the horse obviously spooked or balked at something. I guess if you've never ridden these critters it's something one doesn't understand. Some look for excuses to spook, etc.
chadk66 is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 07-23-2016, 04:06 PM   #51
Track Phantom
Registered User
 
Track Phantom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Austin, Tx
Posts: 2,752
Quote:
Originally Posted by chadk66
the horse obviously spooked or balked at something. I guess if you've never ridden these critters it's something one doesn't understand. Some look for excuses to spook, etc.
That's a bit unfair. Most of us on here have seen many thousands of races and know what action is common and what isn't.

The issue isn't just that the horse spooked. It's the totality of the entire ride. Slow start, 6 wide the entire time, no hand movement in the stretch despite the horse tugging him into contention, yanking him out of contention at the height of the real running, etc.

I think there is a possibility that the horse wasn't totally right and that he shied away from a runner that looked like he was going to come over late. But there sure are times in that ride that it looked like the intention was to keep him off the board. I really don't know either way.

I've always felt the easiest way to fix a race is to stiff the big favorite in a small field. The easiest way to really know is to look at the betting patterns. If I had a print out of the bets (size and frequency) and locations where they came from, I could tell if there was something fishy.
__________________
www.trackphantom.com
full card analysis
Track Phantom is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 07-23-2016, 05:28 PM   #52
KidCruz
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Posts: 62
Quote:
Originally Posted by Track Phantom
That's a bit unfair. Most of us on here have seen many thousands of races and know what action is common and what isn't.

The issue isn't just that the horse spooked. It's the totality of the entire ride. Slow start, 6 wide the entire time, no hand movement in the stretch despite the horse tugging him into contention, yanking him out of contention at the height of the real running, etc.

I think there is a possibility that the horse wasn't totally right and that he shied away from a runner that looked like he was going to come over late. But there sure are times in that ride that it looked like the intention was to keep him off the board. I really don't know either way.

I've always felt the easiest way to fix a race is to stiff the big favorite in a small field. The easiest way to really know is to look at the betting patterns. If I had a print out of the bets (size and frequency) and locations where they came from, I could tell if there was something fishy.

Exactly. By the logic of some people in this thread, horses at the lowest level of racing are immune from suspicion because there are questions about soundness. That is patently unfair and opens the entire country up to manipulation that will ruin the game.

Spooked by something, unsound, reacted to one whip bad, worried about a horse veering out. All the excuses have become such commonplace. It is nice that this one will at least be investigated. Maybe there is nothing untoward but at least it will be looked at.
KidCruz is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 07-23-2016, 07:12 PM   #53
chadk66
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Posts: 5,414
Quote:
Originally Posted by Track Phantom
That's a bit unfair. Most of us on here have seen many thousands of races and know what action is common and what isn't.

The issue isn't just that the horse spooked. It's the totality of the entire ride. Slow start, 6 wide the entire time, no hand movement in the stretch despite the horse tugging him into contention, yanking him out of contention at the height of the real running, etc.

I think there is a possibility that the horse wasn't totally right and that he shied away from a runner that looked like he was going to come over late. But there sure are times in that ride that it looked like the intention was to keep him off the board. I really don't know either way.

I've always felt the easiest way to fix a race is to stiff the big favorite in a small field. The easiest way to really know is to look at the betting patterns. If I had a print out of the bets (size and frequency) and locations where they came from, I could tell if there was something fishy.
I've had the pleasure of both watching thousands of races and galloping/working them thousands of miles. Anyone that has ridden them even a reasonable amount fully understands what happened. I would love to stick you on one of these animals, jack the stirrups up that high and just let you ride him around in the barn. I bet a franklin you don't stay on long But then you'd understand
chadk66 is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 07-23-2016, 07:18 PM   #54
cj
@TimeformUSfigs
 
cj's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Moore, OK
Posts: 46,828
Quote:
Originally Posted by chadk66
I've had the pleasure of both watching thousands of races and galloping/working them thousands of miles. Anyone that has ridden them even a reasonable amount fully understands what happened. I would love to stick you on one of these animals, jack the stirrups up that high and just let you ride him around in the barn. I bet a franklin you don't stay on long But then you'd understand
These are always the lamest posts. You don't have to know how to ride a horse to know a fishy ride. I'm just glad to see stewards actually investigate. Maybe there is nothing to it, but this should be done a lot more often.
cj is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 07-23-2016, 08:37 PM   #55
no breathalyzer
Veteran
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Posts: 2,053
nothing to see here period!. ride wasn't that bad trust me .. i see rides that are way worse daily.. i said this in original thread. and gave a real example which the horse came back and won for fun,,, stewards are clowns. they never even called him in after that race
no breathalyzer is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 07-23-2016, 09:49 PM   #56
zico20
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2014
Location: st louis
Posts: 2,985
Quote:
Originally Posted by davew
The head-on shows a different story and I feel exonerates the jockey. The break had the 1 veering out pinching back the 2, causing the poor start. At the top od the stretch, Tizthedream was running well and looked like it could get 2nd or win, but then something happened. In the last 100 yards, the horse carriage changed and veered out about 8 lanes - possibly left front leg.

Would the stewards also call in a jockey who was in the hospital because the horse they were riding broke down at the finish line?
Did you ever stop and think maybe the jockey on the 1 was in on it also. He maybe purposely came out so the 2 could be pinched back. Many fixed races involve more than one participant.
__________________
You will never achieve 100% if 99% is okay!
zico20 is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 07-23-2016, 10:49 PM   #57
Prairie Bettor
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 113
Quote:
Originally Posted by Track Phantom
If I had a print out of the bets (size and frequency) and locations where they came from, I could tell if there was something fishy.
So because I win big on a race it makes me a criminal? Nice...
Prairie Bettor is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 07-23-2016, 10:58 PM   #58
castaway01
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: NJ
Posts: 3,822
Quote:
Originally Posted by zico20
Did you ever stop and think maybe the jockey on the 1 was in on it also. He maybe purposely came out so the 2 could be pinched back. Many fixed races involve more than one participant.
These posts are just as tiresome as the "if you ever rode a horse you'd understand" posts because while I'm sure there are conspiracies in every sport, if you really believe this you should never bet another race (or you're a moron for doing so).
castaway01 is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 07-23-2016, 11:06 PM   #59
zico20
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2014
Location: st louis
Posts: 2,985
Quote:
Originally Posted by castaway01
These posts are just as tiresome as the "if you ever rode a horse you'd understand" posts because while I'm sure there are conspiracies in every sport, if you really believe this you should never bet another race (or you're a moron for doing so).
Where did I say the race was fixed? He was saying the break was legit, I was pointing out another scenario. If you bet horse racing you accept that from time to time a race is not on the up and up. Sometimes you are the beneficiary and sometimes you are not. They all even out in the long run.
__________________
You will never achieve 100% if 99% is okay!
zico20 is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 07-23-2016, 11:10 PM   #60
Donttellmeshowme
Veteran
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Posts: 818
Quote:
Originally Posted by Track Phantom
I'd rather the trainer get on the back of his own "unsound horse" and see if he'd be willing to ride it in the race. Players have every single right to bitch if any "unsound" horse is ever on the track. It's just bulls*hit that unsound horses are even sent over. Pisses me off and I would never defend it in any way.


Well in this game there are trainers that dont have a fawkin clue about the soundness of a horse. Hell some trainers dont even feed hay of alfalfa to the horse. So there are some horses that get sent over that are stone crippled. Whats the solution? i dont know.
Donttellmeshowme is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Reply





Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

» Advertisement
» Current Polls
Wh deserves to be the favorite? (last 4 figures)
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:52 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Copyright 1999 - 2023 -- PaceAdvantage.Com -- All Rights Reserved
We are a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program
designed to provide a means for us to earn fees by linking to Amazon.com and affiliated sites.