Horse Racing Forum - PaceAdvantage.Com - Horse Racing Message Board

Go Back   Horse Racing Forum - PaceAdvantage.Com - Horse Racing Message Board > Thoroughbred Horse Racing Discussion > **TRIPLE CROWN TRAIL**


Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
Old 06-18-2016, 08:51 PM   #16
castaway01
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: NJ
Posts: 3,822
Quote:
Originally Posted by bobphilo
Both the Australian and Jockey Club study make the error of using skewed distributions on ability giving biased results. Industry studies have a tendency to "prove"what is economically to their advantage. As statisticians say, "He who pays you sways you".
Lacking evidence from unbiased studies I will go with the medical knowledge on the effect of excessive stress on immature bones and joints.
There's a reason why Arabians are not allowed to race until, they are 3YOs

http://www.horsefund.org/horse-racin...bies-part4.php
Reality is the opposite of what you claim though. Horses raced much more at age 2 50 years ago than they do now, yet had longer careers with more races. For example, Seabiscuit ran 35 times as a 2-year-old and raced until age 7. That was typical back then. Spare me the skewed distributions---real life proves your theory wrong.
castaway01 is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 06-18-2016, 09:13 PM   #17
bobphilo
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Palm Beach, Florida
Posts: 2,465
Quote:
Originally Posted by castaway01
Reality is the opposite of what you claim though. Horses raced much more at age 2 50 years ago than they do now, yet had longer careers with more races. For example, Seabiscuit ran 35 times as a 2-year-old and raced until age 7. That was typical back then. Spare me the skewed distributions---real life proves your theory wrong.
Spare me your irrelevances. Your version of "real life"' is contradicted by the research. Do you even know how to interpret research properly?
Horses were much sounder back then and could better stand up to the stress of racing. By the way, Seabiscuit never raced on Lasix as it was illegal in the days of the iron horses. Why do you think all the top trainers today space out their horses races? Breeding only for speed rather than soundness, too early racing and modern abuse of Lasix has made today's Thoroughbred a frail creature.

Last edited by bobphilo; 06-18-2016 at 09:17 PM.
bobphilo is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 06-19-2016, 03:04 PM   #18
Redboard
$2 Showbettor
 
Redboard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: The Villages
Posts: 2,578
Quote:
Originally Posted by bobphilo
Way too early. Plenty of more races still to be run before the 2017 Derby hype begins. the Haskel, Travers, Breeder's Cup, etc.
IMO Derby hype begins too early just like the Presidential election campaigns.
Right you are. The season has just begun. I like the summer races leading up to the Breeders cup better than the derby trail.
Redboard is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 06-19-2016, 09:16 PM   #19
depalma113
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 1,725
Quote:
Originally Posted by bobphilo
Spare me your irrelevances. Your version of "real life"' is contradicted by the research. Do you even know how to interpret research properly?
Horses were much sounder back then and could better stand up to the stress of racing. By the way, Seabiscuit never raced on Lasix as it was illegal in the days of the iron horses. Why do you think all the top trainers today space out their horses races? Breeding only for speed rather than soundness, too early racing and modern abuse of Lasix has made today's Thoroughbred a frail creature.
Adjusted for inflation, Seabiscuit would have earned $89,998 per start.

American Pharoah earned $786,390 per start.

Horses don't race every week because they don't have to. It has nothing to do with soundness. It has everything to do with the purse size.
depalma113 is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 06-20-2016, 04:21 PM   #20
clocker7
Veteran
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 692
Quote:
Originally Posted by bobphilo
Spare me your irrelevances. Your version of "real life"' is contradicted by the research. Do you even know how to interpret research properly?
Horses were much sounder back then and could better stand up to the stress of racing. By the way, Seabiscuit never raced on Lasix as it was illegal in the days of the iron horses. Why do you think all the top trainers today space out their horses races? Breeding only for speed rather than soundness, too early racing and modern abuse of Lasix has made today's Thoroughbred a frail creature.
I think that you are conflating soundness with the breed's staying qualities.

Thoroughbreds have always been unsound. But a portion of them were iron horses that harbored genetic short-turnaround capabilities. That was important during the mercenary era from roughly 1885 to WWII when economically-desperate people did desperate things.

Nobody with a clue wants to go back to those days. Lasix? LOLOL. Compared to what many horses were ingesting those days ... it is a placebo, if not a palliative.
clocker7 is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Reply





Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

» Advertisement
» Current Polls
Wh deserves to be the favorite? (last 4 figures)
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:06 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Copyright 1999 - 2023 -- PaceAdvantage.Com -- All Rights Reserved
We are a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program
designed to provide a means for us to earn fees by linking to Amazon.com and affiliated sites.