Quote:
|
Originally Posted by CincyHorseplayer
That's all you're doing is piping up.
Piping up before the race and now wrong.
Piping up about somebody else piping up.
Why don't you just pipe your way on to something you are right about because we've heard enough piping from you for a while! The opening poster had some good hard common sense and a lot of us agreed. I don't need to huff and puff and blow somebody's house down about every point about a single race. People like you got that call of duty. So Peter Piper Puffed a Pack of Pickled Peppers start piping yourself into oblivion!  |
Funny, I don't recall you piping up about this matter after the 2012 Preakness, or 2014 or 2015. Interesting. I wonder why.
Anybody who read what I posted between the Derby and Preakness, it's quite obvious what I said:
Nyquist was the horse to beat, that Exaggerator was the one horse with a legit chance and that the others were outclassed.
Nyquist is more in the class of California Chrome than American Pharoah.
Right after the Derby, when people were talking about Nyquist being near the hot pace, I tried to back them off a bit by noting that he was in excellent position given how the track played that day and thus he probably shouldn't get any extra pace credit nor should Exaggerator be penalized.
Said all along that I was passing because one of the top two would probably win the race. Not sure how my opinions could be interpreted as terribly incorrect.
Preaknesses??) 
