Quote:
|
Originally Posted by DeltaLover
Since I almost never follow public handicappers and their picks, I have to admit that I do not have enough input to doubt the abilities of Andy. More than this, at no point I have had the intention of insulting anyone, in contrary, I am always very careful to avoid this kind of a behaviour.
Based in you professional relation with the industry, your views seem to be biased and subjective; most likely, this should be the reason why, instead of using logic and facts who seem to be rather emotional and prejudiced!
As far as erasing my post, I was never a fan of censorship, a procedure that you appear to be fond of.
|
Well, at least you admit that you were part wrong. The thing that really pissed me off was when you said that they failed miserably in their picks because they didn't pick AP. After the race, of course. This is completely absurd. Favorites got killed Saturday and 3 odds on favorites lost. Great horses that looked like stone cold locks have lost the Belmont several times. A favorite hadn't won the Belmont in over 10 years.
To point to a heavy favorite after it wins and say you did a lousy handicapping job if you didn't pick it is not only ridiculous, it's arrogant. Let's see you post your picks and see how well you do.
