Horse Racing Forum - PaceAdvantage.Com - Horse Racing Message Board

Go Back   Horse Racing Forum - PaceAdvantage.Com - Horse Racing Message Board > Thoroughbred Horse Racing Discussion > Handicapper's Corner


Reply
 
Thread Tools Rating: Thread Rating: 5 votes, 5.00 average.
Old 06-14-2014, 04:17 PM   #46
Some_One
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2001
Posts: 1,911
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sapio
Hi Robert

From a good source, try PP and 1 - 1/odds as regressors as a starting point.

odds = final tote odds

Thomas Sapio
However when one is ready to make the bet, they don't know the final odds, as such I would never use final odds as factor IMO.
Some_One is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 06-14-2014, 04:40 PM   #47
Robert Goren
Racing Form Detective
 
Robert Goren's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Lincoln, Ne but my heart is at Santa Anita
Posts: 16,316
Quote:
Originally Posted by Some_One
However when one is ready to make the bet, they don't know the final odds, as such I would never use final odds as factor IMO.
In almost all cases at major tracks you have a pretty good guess at the range to work with at 1 MTP.
__________________
Some day in the not too distant future, horse players will betting on computer generated races over the net. Race tracks will become casinos and shopping centers. And some crooner will be belting out "there used to be a race track here".
Robert Goren is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 07-23-2014, 12:06 PM   #48
Robert Goren
Racing Form Detective
 
Robert Goren's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Lincoln, Ne but my heart is at Santa Anita
Posts: 16,316
I fell a couple weeks ago. no broken bones but back to rehab. Some decisions have to made in the next couple of weeks. I may go to assisted living. I have my laptop now so I will be back on limited basis.
__________________
Some day in the not too distant future, horse players will betting on computer generated races over the net. Race tracks will become casinos and shopping centers. And some crooner will be belting out "there used to be a race track here".
Robert Goren is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 07-23-2014, 12:35 PM   #49
Tom
The Voice of Reason!
 
Tom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Canandaigua, New york
Posts: 112,861
I was wondering where you where last week.
Glad you're back - hope it works out.
__________________
Who does the Racing Form Detective like in this one?
Tom is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 07-23-2014, 01:41 PM   #50
whodoyoulike
Veteran
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 3,428
Quote:
Originally Posted by Robert Goren
I fell a couple weeks ago. no broken bones but back to rehab. Some decisions have to made in the next couple of weeks. I may go to assisted living. I have my laptop now so I will be back on limited basis.
Sounds very serious. Keep posting, if only to just say hello. I would like to know who you think will win at Dmr Thursday in race 2?

Be careful and take care.
whodoyoulike is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 07-23-2014, 08:30 PM   #51
TrifectaMike
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 1,591
Quote:
Originally Posted by Robert Goren
I fell a couple weeks ago. no broken bones but back to rehab. Some decisions have to made in the next couple of weeks. I may go to assisted living. I have my laptop now so I will be back on limited basis.
Robert, stay busy and get well soon.

God Bless
Mike
TrifectaMike is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 07-23-2014, 10:53 PM   #52
whodoyoulike
Veteran
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 3,428
Quote:
Originally Posted by Robert Goren
I fell a couple weeks ago. no broken bones but back to rehab. Some decisions have to made in the next couple of weeks. I may go to assisted living. I have my laptop now so I will be back on limited basis.
I hope you're not trying to use this as an excuse for not revealing what you found out about "Playing around with Prime Power Numbers"?

I've personally been waiting a long time for your study's results.

Last edited by whodoyoulike; 07-23-2014 at 10:56 PM.
whodoyoulike is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 08-14-2014, 07:10 PM   #53
Robert Goren
Racing Form Detective
 
Robert Goren's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Lincoln, Ne but my heart is at Santa Anita
Posts: 16,316
Tomorrow I move to assisted living. Hopefully I will be able to post from there.

As for the research, the only thing I can say for sure is that top rated horses with big gaps don't win anywhere nears as often as they should and there may be value in betting in betting other horses in a race with such a horse especially if the other horse is bet. But most of you aready knew that. I intend to look at which horse when, as soon as I figure out how to write enough code in "R" to take advantage of their stat packages. I have found how far behind the times I have become in what should be basic skill (writing very simple code). What little I knew from a college I took over 40 years, I have forgotten and even I hadn't, it would be way past obsolete.
__________________
Some day in the not too distant future, horse players will betting on computer generated races over the net. Race tracks will become casinos and shopping centers. And some crooner will be belting out "there used to be a race track here".
Robert Goren is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 08-14-2014, 08:49 PM   #54
raybo
EXCEL with SUPERFECTAS
 
raybo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 10,206
Robert, best wishes for your recovery! As TM said, stay busy and keep in touch!!
__________________
Ray
Horseracing's like the stock market except you don't have to wait as long to go broke.

Excel Spreadsheet Handicapping Forum

Charter Member: Horseplayers Association of North America
raybo is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 08-14-2014, 09:59 PM   #55
Tom
The Voice of Reason!
 
Tom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Canandaigua, New york
Posts: 112,861
Good luck, Bobby - hope it works out good for you.
Just an observation, I see a lot of horse with huge gaps back to #2 that do not run well. Maybe you'll write book about this.
__________________
Who does the Racing Form Detective like in this one?
Tom is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 08-16-2014, 03:26 AM   #56
highnote
Registered User
 
highnote's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 10,861
Quote:
Originally Posted by Robert Goren
I then use square root of Kelly to determine the size of the bet. I plug 75% of my % win chance for the estimate chance of winning in the Kelly formula. I am being very conservative because it so early in the development.
Hi Robert,

Hope you get well soon!

It's good to be conservative in estimating your probabilities -- especially early on when you don't know whether your bets have a positive expected value or negative expected value.

You might consider this: According to research done by Dr. Z a good method of sizing your bets is to use fractional Kelly.

Using a square root is probably way too conservative given that you are already reducing your probability by 25%. By using the sqr you are not getting the biggest benefit of Kelly because as the recommended full Kelly bet gets larger you are betting a smaller percentage than if you just bet a flat percentage of Kelly.

You are not likely to go broke by being conservative, but in theory, by betting less than full Kelly, but you are also not maximizing your wealth because you are underbetting.

If the recommended bet is $9 then the sqr is $3 -- 33% of full Kelly. If the recommended bet is $64 then the sqr is $8 -- 25% of full Kelly. For a $100 bet the sqr is $10 -- 10% of full Kelly. If the full Kelly bet is $10,000 you would only bet $100 -- 1% of your bet. As your fully Kelly bet approaches infinity your sqr percentage approaches 0%. If your probabilities are accurate you would bet $2500 if you had a $10,000 suggested full Kelly wager and were betting 25%. That's a big difference. And your wealth would be growing exponentially, as it is supposed to using Kelly.

So betting 25% of full Kelly might be a better option than the sqr. You still minimize the chance of going broke, while getting the benefit of maximizing the growth of your wealth.

With small bets it doesn't make much of a difference -- especially in the short run. But in the long run it could be huge.

Good luck!

Last edited by highnote; 08-16-2014 at 03:34 AM.
highnote is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 11-21-2014, 07:02 AM   #57
Robert Goren
Racing Form Detective
 
Robert Goren's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Lincoln, Ne but my heart is at Santa Anita
Posts: 16,316
A small note on my dizziness. A doctor yesterday said my center of vision was off. I will go in after Thanksgiving and get corrective lens which should bring it back to where it is suppose to be in about 5 weeks. She said there may be other problems causing the dizziness too, but maybe not too. In any case, I have to get this fixed first.

Back to the Prime Power stuff. I am back to work on it some after getting rid of the Decrypt. Almost was saved to DropBox. Sometimes I actually do something that was smart.
__________________
Some day in the not too distant future, horse players will betting on computer generated races over the net. Race tracks will become casinos and shopping centers. And some crooner will be belting out "there used to be a race track here".
Robert Goren is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 01-22-2015, 04:29 PM   #58
Robert Goren
Racing Form Detective
 
Robert Goren's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Lincoln, Ne but my heart is at Santa Anita
Posts: 16,316
Well, I have final got 400 races entered into excel. Here is the first result.
Y=exp(0.14863(Prime Power Rating)
Sum the Ys for the race.
Take the Y for the horse and divide by the sum.
You now the percentage of each horse winning.
Note: instead of using the PPR, I use the PPR minus the lowest rated horse's PPR.
A morning line can be constructed by
ML= 0.83(17% takeout) divided a horse's winning percentage and then subtracting one. Round down and convert to familiar odds. For instance 1.4 becomes 7/5, 2.6 becomes 5/2, and 8.8 becomes 8/1.
These numbers are a horse's chance of winning, not an attempt to guess the pari-mutuel odds. They are based on BRIS's prime power rating. I would not wager on these numbers alone because I believe they will not show a positive ROI if you try to bet overlays to these numbers. Plus I have some doubts about that a point difference between the top two horses is the same as point difference between the bottom two horses. This first run of the numbers treated all PPR in the race the same.
The Good Lord willing and the creek don't rise, I will be back here in the near future with some more PPR insights.
__________________
Some day in the not too distant future, horse players will betting on computer generated races over the net. Race tracks will become casinos and shopping centers. And some crooner will be belting out "there used to be a race track here".
Robert Goren is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 01-29-2015, 09:15 AM   #59
Helles
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Denver, CO.
Posts: 217
Robert, I hope your health improves! Thank you for sharing your work.

Doug
Helles is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 01-29-2015, 11:31 AM   #60
raybo
EXCEL with SUPERFECTAS
 
raybo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 10,206
Quote:
Originally Posted by Robert Goren
Y=exp(0.14863(Prime Power Rating)
Why 0.14863? Why not use the PP as it is?
__________________
Ray
Horseracing's like the stock market except you don't have to wait as long to go broke.

Excel Spreadsheet Handicapping Forum

Charter Member: Horseplayers Association of North America
raybo is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Reply





Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

» Advertisement
» Current Polls
Wh deserves to be the favorite? (last 4 figures)
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:17 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Copyright 1999 - 2023 -- PaceAdvantage.Com -- All Rights Reserved
We are a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program
designed to provide a means for us to earn fees by linking to Amazon.com and affiliated sites.