|
|
03-07-2015, 04:57 PM
|
#61
|
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 7,510
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Stillriledup
You can bet on 1X today in the feetch.
Not just 1 or 1a, but 1x.
3 for the price of ...uh, 3.
|
Not sure what you mean...An entry is an entry.....It is one betting interest.
I'm looking at TVG's on line tote....It's a coupled entry for wagering purposes.
|
|
|
03-07-2015, 05:07 PM
|
#62
|
Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 25,607
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by thespaah
Not sure what you mean...An entry is an entry.....It is one betting interest.
I'm looking at TVG's on line tote....It's a coupled entry for wagering purposes.
|
And its a good thing they were coupled too because its important for integrity.
|
|
|
03-07-2015, 07:21 PM
|
#63
|
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 7,510
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Stillriledup
And its a good thing they were coupled too because its important for integrity.
|
I was looking for an answer to my question.
Thanks
|
|
|
07-06-2015, 02:39 PM
|
#64
|
Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 25,607
|
|
|
|
07-06-2015, 04:32 PM
|
#65
|
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Lehigh Valley, PA.
Posts: 7,464
|
This is a step in the right direction. Entries are absurd.
|
|
|
07-06-2015, 04:49 PM
|
#66
|
@TimeformUSfigs
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Moore, OK
Posts: 46,828
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by pandy
This is a step in the right direction. Entries are absurd.
|
I can see both sides of it. Will be interesting to see how certain trainers that control the claiming game in New York take advantage of this. What the new rule does is make it even more "people racing" than "horse racing" in my opinion. Some people like that, some don't.
|
|
|
07-06-2015, 04:52 PM
|
#67
|
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Lehigh Valley, PA.
Posts: 7,464
|
I agree, there are people that like entries, but I believe that surveys have shown well over 65% are opposed to them.
|
|
|
07-06-2015, 05:22 PM
|
#68
|
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 7,510
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by pandy
This is a step in the right direction. Entries are absurd.
|
They are absurd until an investigation discovers unusual betting patterns and/or manipulation of the finishing order...
Hopefully every one involved will remember to maintain integrity.
|
|
|
07-06-2015, 05:23 PM
|
#69
|
Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 25,607
|
What is the purpose of entries? What's the logic?
|
|
|
07-06-2015, 05:44 PM
|
#70
|
@TimeformUSfigs
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Moore, OK
Posts: 46,828
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Stillriledup
What is the purpose of entries? What's the logic?
|
The intent was to stop trainers from playing games.
|
|
|
07-06-2015, 05:44 PM
|
#71
|
@TimeformUSfigs
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Moore, OK
Posts: 46,828
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by thespaah
They are absurd until an investigation discovers unusual betting patterns and/or manipulation of the finishing order...
Hopefully every one involved will remember to maintain integrity.
|
Yep, that is the danger.
|
|
|
07-06-2015, 06:23 PM
|
#72
|
Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 25,607
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by cj
The intent was to stop trainers from playing games.
|
But can't they play games anyway? Same w jocks if a jock is riding for a trainer who has 2 in the race he might help out the other trainers horse without even caring if its coupled or not.
This may be a bad example but the Ramsey horse in the big race at Monmouth who won wasnt there another Ramsey 99-1 rolling on the front end? They weren't coupled but were probably ridden the same way coupled or not.
|
|
|
07-06-2015, 06:56 PM
|
#73
|
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 7,510
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Stillriledup
What is the purpose of entries? What's the logic?
|
The intent is to prevent horses of common ownership from being used to manipulate the order of finish or to create a desired order of finish for the purpose of cashing wagers
Hey, back in the day, it was much worse.
So for example there were 4 horses in which two had a common trainer and two others with common ownership....And let's say the ownership was in part one of the trainers that was part of the two other trained by him....That would result in an entry of 4 horses.
Coupled entries were not a real issue when most fields were full...Now with short fields and the ridiculous number of scratches, entries are a big PITA
|
|
|
07-06-2015, 07:22 PM
|
#74
|
Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 25,607
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by thespaah
The intent is to prevent horses of common ownership from being used to manipulate the order of finish or to create a desired order of finish for the purpose of cashing wagers
Hey, back in the day, it was much worse.
So for example there were 4 horses in which two had a common trainer and two others with common ownership....And let's say the ownership was in part one of the trainers that was part of the two other trained by him....That would result in an entry of 4 horses.
Coupled entries were not a real issue when most fields were full...Now with short fields and the ridiculous number of scratches, entries are a big PITA
|
Can't they have separate betting interests and if there's rider manipulation, hand down a huge fine and suspension to deter that behavior? Why put the onus on the horseplayer?
|
|
|
07-06-2015, 08:23 PM
|
#75
|
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 7,510
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Stillriledup
But can't they play games anyway? Same w jocks if a jock is riding for a trainer who has 2 in the race he might help out the other trainers horse without even caring if its coupled or not.
This may be a bad example but the Ramsey horse in the big race at Monmouth who won wasnt there another Ramsey 99-1 rolling on the front end? They weren't coupled but were probably ridden the same way coupled or not.
|
The only way to detect this is unusual betting patterns.
|
|
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|