Horse Racing Forum - PaceAdvantage.Com - Horse Racing Message Board

Go Back   Horse Racing Forum - PaceAdvantage.Com - Horse Racing Message Board > Off Topic > Off Topic - General


Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
Old 07-26-2013, 01:02 AM   #1
Jeff P
Registered User
 
Jeff P's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: JCapper Platinum: Kind of like Deep Blue... but for horses.
Posts: 5,290
Headlines, Agendas, and Story Content

It's hard for me to say when it first started, but looking back I realize now it's been going on for quite some time. It appears to be getting worse and worse with each passing day.

What am I talking about?

While reading the news I have a tendency to glance at headlines. And when a headline catches my eye, then I'll read the story.

Trouble is, a LOT of headlines these days appear to be nothing more than carefully chosen phrases meant to sensationalize a story in such a way so as to further a political agenda.

Take for example the following headline from a story that broke earlier today:

Zimmerman Juror B29 to ABC News: 'He got away with murder'

Now, here's a link to the story itself as reported by the LA Times:
http://www.latimes.com/news/nation/n...,3330582.story

And here's a quote from the story itself:
Quote:
Like Juror B37, who spoke last week on Anderson Cooper's CNN show, Juror B29 maintained that race wasn’t a factor in her deliberations.

She said she pushed for Zimmerman to be convicted of second-degree murder until she decided on the second day of deliberations that there wasn't enough definitive proof.
Let's go over that again...

According to the headline: 'He got away with murder'

But if I take the time to read the story in its entirely, I discover that the headline is only one tiny piece of the whole.

According to the story: Juror B29 (initially) wanted to convict... But maintained race wasn't a factor and decided on the second day of deliberations that there wasn't enough definitive proof.

Which is it?

After reading the story, and if I were the one responsible for writing the headline, I might have written something like the following:

Zimmerman Juror B29 torn and tells ABC News: 'But we had to grab our hearts and put it aside and look at the evidence.'

(But then maybe that wouldn't sell newspapers.)

Before anyone accuses ME of pushing an agenda, THIS CUTS BOTH WAYS AND ON BOTH SIDES OF THE AISLE. And it happens with every story that has even a smidgeon of political overtone attached to it. And the headline is slanted to the left or the right depending on ownership of the media outlet reporting the story.

Is it just me? Or is there no one out there practicing actual journalism?



-jp

.
__________________
Team JCapper: 2011 PAIHL Regular Season ROI Leader after 15 weeks
www.JCapper.com

Last edited by Jeff P; 07-26-2013 at 01:14 AM.
Jeff P is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 07-26-2013, 01:20 AM   #2
Stillriledup
Veteran
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 25,607
True journalism is very rare because these people are not hired to uncover "breaking news" they're hired to sell copy and generate website hits, etc.

True journalism doesnt sell, sensationalism does.

CNN plastered her all over their tv shows today, even though she really had nothing groundbreaking to say.
Stillriledup is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Reply





Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

» Advertisement
» Current Polls
Wh deserves to be the favorite? (last 4 figures)
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:39 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Copyright 1999 - 2023 -- PaceAdvantage.Com -- All Rights Reserved
We are a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program
designed to provide a means for us to earn fees by linking to Amazon.com and affiliated sites.