Meanwhile in Kenosha...

[myohmyjustify]

Originally Posted by tucker6

My wife was called a white ass cracker two weeks ago.

She could have been called worse. She could have been called a "Karen".

[Tom]

Originally Posted by MargieRose

Is it in the blurred video that you are assuming he was pointing his gun at someone unprovoked, to begin with? The prosecutors are.

Lots of people, including seasoned attorneys, don't see it that way. The clear videos, where he WAS pointing his gun at someone, absolutely show that he was doing so in self-defense...nothing less.

Regardless, the burden of proof "beyond a reasonable doubt" (i.e. no doubt) has not been met, IMO. If it were, there would not be so many differing opinions; most of them weighted in self-defense. Consider the source, as well, of most of the people declaring otherwise.

No video, testimony.
By Baby Rambo himself.

[tucker6]

Originally Posted by myohmyjustify

She could have been called worse. She could have been called a "Karen".

A Karen she is not.

[MargieRose]

Originally Posted by Tom

No video, testimony.
By Baby Rambo himself.

I gotta say, after listening to the Judge explain the law for self defense, and watching the video in the closing arguments by the moron prosecutor who is doing a tremendous presentation today, Kyle is guilty. He did not act in self defense.

Provocation never entered my mind when I changed my mind.

I am basing it on the video and the testimony.

And isn't his pointing a gun at someone provocation?

Now it's "No video, testimony." ↑

So, you changed your mind...why? You're confusing me.

[OntheRail]

Originally Posted by Tom

There is a lot of video that is very clear.
And isn't his pointing a gun at someone provocation?

From the videos I've seen. I did not see him pointing his weapon willynilly at random people.. and he sure as hell did not spray and pray like boyz from the hood all Rambo style. No innocent bystanders where shot by him.

As for provocation... depends on the circumstances. The pointing of a weapon... can be used as a deterrent to a perceived threat... with out a shot fired. While allowing you to be at the ready if further action is required. In this case I say no they are slinging shit in the hope something sticks.

[ReplayRandall]

Watch at the very end.....What did you see?

Twitter

---

Last edited by ReplayRandall; 11-16-2021 at 11:59 PM.

[davew]

COME ON MAN, that was after Rittenhouse pointed his gun at people, like this guy pointing gun at jury. After being 'threatened' it is permissible for mob to chase down and injure/kill someone like Kyle.

[boxcar]

because the Defense has very good grounds!

Rittenhouse Defense Files Late Motion for Mistrial with Prejudice — No Retrial if Granted

https://thelibertydaily.com/breaking...al-if-granted/

[Tom]

Originally Posted by MargieRose

Now it's "No video, testimony." ↑

So, you changed your mind...why? You're confusing me.

No video, meaning I am not basing it on any video, blurred or not. I was referring to testimony by Rittenhouse. Early on, a guy thought Rit pointed his gun at him. He asked him if he did and Rit said yes, to avoid a conflict. But by doing so, anyone around him were under the impression that this kid is walking around pointing a rifle at people.

The only time I changed my mind was after listening to hours of testimony and videos. I do not agree that he acted in self defense in every charge. I do think, however, that there is ample instances of prosecutorial overreach for a mistrial, or even dismissal of charges with prejudice. The most important thing going on is that we can't allow government to use these kinds of sleezy tactics against the accused, no matter who they are.

btw...now, 12:35pm est, jury may soon coming back to review video. What video may be telling how they may be leaning.

[Tom]

Originally Posted by davew

COME ON MAN, that was after Rittenhouse pointed his gun at people, like this guy pointing gun at jury. After being 'threatened' it is permissible for mob to chase down and injure/kill someone like Kyle.

OMG, wouldn't it be ironic if he shot the jury!

btw, I have not heard, or missed it, but do we know how many rounds he fired in total? We know he had 30 rounds to start.

[classhandicapper]

Originally Posted by ReplayRandall

Watch at the very end.....What did you see?

https://twitter.com/TickleTexts/stat...99181651607555

This video may be a missing a key part to the story.

You can see the guy he shot in the arm and you can see the guy he shot that falls to the ground (he died), but one other person died. So they may have been chasing him because he killed someone else first. We have to see that video too.

[ReplayRandall]

Originally Posted by classhandicapper

This video may be a missing a key part to the story.

You can see the guy he shot in the arm and you can see the guy he shot that falls to the ground (he died), but one other person died. So they may have been chasing him because he killed someone else first. We have to see that video too.

Here you go....Multiple angles of info.....Can't vouch for the site, but it's a start.

https://yourdaddyjoey.news/2021/11/1...an-identified/

[Jeff P]

Link to a Yahoo News article with enhanced video of the first shooting:
https://www.yahoo.com/now/enhanced-d...155330597.html

Hint: wait for the ad to get done playing.


-jp

.

[Karakorum Kabbage]

Twitter

[fast4522]

Originally Posted by Karakorum Kabbage

https://twitter.com/JasonKander/stat...42128621125635

Is his AR-15 as nice as yours?