Horse Racing Forum - PaceAdvantage.Com - Horse Racing Message Board

Go Back   Horse Racing Forum - PaceAdvantage.Com - Horse Racing Message Board > Thoroughbred Horse Racing Discussion > General Racing Discussion


Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
Old 01-17-2018, 11:11 AM   #1
Fred Mertz
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: Kentucky
Posts: 433
The Importance of Lowering Takeout in Horse Betting

Quote:
My column from New Year’s Day drew so much reaction I thought I would follow up on it. If you did not read it, I compared the mentality of a sports bettor with that of a horseplayer. A sports bettor is happy to bet into 11 to 10 odds. Meanwhile most self-respecting horseplayers will almost never make a straight bet on the favorite.

Many commented that I was comparing apples to oranges. That sports bettors are playing a side or a team, so it’s an “either or” bet. In horse racing, a favorite, depending on field size, may have to defeat as many as five to 11 other horses. That makes it a more daunting task.

[Snip]

Thesis:

I believe what horse racing will need to do is fight fire with fire. If legal sports betting is offered with a 10 percent hold of 12 to 10, then the horse racing industry should reduce takeout on win, place and show betting also to 10 percent.
https://www.americasbestracing.net/g...-horse-betting

Richard Eng is the author of “Betting on Horse Racing for Dummies,” an introductory book for newcomers to the sport of horse racing.

Last edited by PaceAdvantage; 01-20-2018 at 04:34 PM.
Fred Mertz is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 01-17-2018, 01:27 PM   #2
AndyC
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 4,274
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fred Mertz View Post
My column from New Year’s Day drew so much reaction I thought I would follow up on it. If you did not read it, I compared the mentality of a sports bettor with that of a horseplayer. A sports bettor is happy to bet into 11 to 10 odds. Meanwhile most self-respecting horseplayers will almost never make a straight bet on the favorite.

Many commented that I was comparing apples to oranges. That sports bettors are playing a side or a team, so it’s an “either or” bet. In horse racing, a favorite, depending on field size, may have to defeat as many as five to 11 other horses. That makes it a more daunting task.

[Snip]

Thesis:

I believe what horse racing will need to do is fight fire with fire. If legal sports betting is offered with a 10 percent hold of 12 to 10, then the horse racing industry should reduce takeout on win, place and show betting also to 10 percent.
You will have to get a little deeper in to the how-to for a track to offer 11-10 or 12-10 to the bettors through a pari-mutuel system. With a PM system the tracks would have a vested interest in a favorite losing. If a favorite has 40% of the pool the vig would only be collected from the 60% losers. With a long shot having 5% of the pool the track would collect on 95% of the bets. There is no mechanism such as point spread movements to equalize the betting as there is in sports betting.
AndyC is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 01-17-2018, 02:44 PM   #3
biggestal99
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Posts: 4,520
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fred Mertz View Post

Thesis:

I believe what horse racing will need to do is fight fire with fire. If legal sports betting is offered with a 10 percent hold of 12 to 10, then the horse racing industry should reduce takeout on win, place and show betting also to 10 percent.

https://www.americasbestracing.net/g...-horse-betting

Richard Eng is the author of “Betting on Horse Racing for Dummies,” an introductory book for newcomers to the sport of horse racing.
Well Monmouth has reduced the vig to 12% on exchange bets, WPS.

when I cash on a chalk I pay 12% and no breakage. seems very civilized.

Of course most likely Monmouth will be the first racetrack also to take sports bets.

wonder what will hill will set the vig up at Monmouth.

Allan
biggestal99 is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 01-17-2018, 03:53 PM   #4
DeltaLover
Registered user
 
DeltaLover's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: FALIRIKON DELTA
Posts: 4,439
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fred Mertz View Post
My column from New Year’s Day drew so much reaction I thought I would follow up on it. If you did not read it, I compared the mentality of a sports bettor with that of a horseplayer. A sports bettor is happy to bet into 11 to 10 odds. Meanwhile most self-respecting horseplayers will almost never make a straight bet on the favorite.
The highlighted section of your posting is a huge self contradiction; if anything it opens the discussion about your definition of a "self-respecting horseplayer".. Very simply stated, the favorite becomes one because it is backed by the majority of the bettors who obviously are making straight bets on it.
__________________
whereof one cannot speak thereof one must be silent
Ludwig Wittgenstein
DeltaLover is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 01-17-2018, 05:59 PM   #5
dilanesp
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 8,798
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fred Mertz View Post
My column from New Year’s Day drew so much reaction I thought I would follow up on it. If you did not read it, I compared the mentality of a sports bettor with that of a horseplayer. A sports bettor is happy to bet into 11 to 10 odds. Meanwhile most self-respecting horseplayers will almost never make a straight bet on the favorite.

Many commented that I was comparing apples to oranges. That sports bettors are playing a side or a team, so it’s an “either or” bet. In horse racing, a favorite, depending on field size, may have to defeat as many as five to 11 other horses. That makes it a more daunting task.

[Snip]

Thesis:

I believe what horse racing will need to do is fight fire with fire. If legal sports betting is offered with a 10 percent hold of 12 to 10, then the horse racing industry should reduce takeout on win, place and show betting also to 10 percent.

https://www.americasbestracing.net/g...-horse-betting

Richard Eng is the author of “Betting on Horse Racing for Dummies,” an introductory book for newcomers to the sport of horse racing.
Technically the takeout on a 11-10 vigorish sports bet is 1/21, or about 4.8 percent. Not 10 percent.
dilanesp is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 01-17-2018, 06:07 PM   #6
AndyC
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 4,274
Quote:
Originally Posted by dilanesp View Post
Technically the takeout on a 11-10 vigorish sports bet is 1/21, or about 4.8 percent. Not 10 percent.
That was stated in the article, although 5% was used. The actual vig is 4.545%, or 1/22.
AndyC is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 01-17-2018, 07:27 PM   #7
AltonKelsey
Veteran
 
AltonKelsey's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2016
Posts: 1,831
Quote:
Originally Posted by DeltaLover View Post
The highlighted section of your posting is a huge self contradiction; if anything it opens the discussion about your definition of a "self-respecting horseplayer".. Very simply stated, the favorite becomes one because it is backed by the majority of the bettors who obviously are making straight bets on it.
Like the old joke, no one goes there anymore, it's too crowded.
AltonKelsey is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 01-17-2018, 10:58 PM   #8
thaskalos
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 28,388
If sports-betting is offered at 12-10 after "legalization"...then it will be a worse gamble than horse racing is right now. An first glance the 10% takeout on sports-betting looks inviting, but there isn't enough "room for error" when there are only two betting sides to a wager...and the winning gambler is looking to capitalize on his competition's "mistakes". That's why the short fields that we currently see at the track are the anathema of the profit-seeking horseplayer. The shorter the field, the lesser the betting options...and the more unlikely our chances become of finding an "overlay" by capitalizing on our competition's mistakes.
__________________
Live to play another day.

Last edited by thaskalos; 01-17-2018 at 10:59 PM.
thaskalos is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 01-18-2018, 03:28 AM   #9
dilanesp
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 8,798
Quote:
Originally Posted by thaskalos View Post
If sports-betting is offered at 12-10 after "legalization"...then it will be a worse gamble than horse racing is right now. An first glance the 10% takeout on sports-betting looks inviting, but there isn't enough "room for error" when there are only two betting sides to a wager...and the winning gambler is looking to capitalize on his competition's "mistakes". That's why the short fields that we currently see at the track are the anathema of the profit-seeking horseplayer. The shorter the field, the lesser the betting options...and the more unlikely our chances become of finding an "overlay" by capitalizing on our competition's mistakes.
It is even worse than thar.

Nobody really beats sports long term even at 11 to 10, because there aren't any information asymmetries. It is the Efficient Markets Hypothesis in pure form.
dilanesp is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 01-18-2018, 04:04 AM   #10
jay68802
Registered User
 
jay68802's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Nebraska
Posts: 15,110
And those guys in Vegas that set the spread, are pretty damn good.
jay68802 is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 01-18-2018, 10:11 AM   #11
cj
@TimeformUSfigs
 
cj's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Moore, OK
Posts: 46,816
Quote:
Originally Posted by dilanesp View Post
It is even worse than thar.

Nobody really beats sports long term even at 11 to 10, because there aren't any information asymmetries. It is the Efficient Markets Hypothesis in pure form.
You mean all those touts I hear on sports radio are lying?
cj is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 01-18-2018, 12:01 PM   #12
thaskalos
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 28,388
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fred Mertz View Post
My column from New Year’s Day drew so much reaction I thought I would follow up on it. If you did not read it, I compared the mentality of a sports bettor with that of a horseplayer. A sports bettor is happy to bet into 11 to 10 odds. Meanwhile most self-respecting horseplayers will almost never make a straight bet on the favorite.

Many commented that I was comparing apples to oranges. That sports bettors are playing a side or a team, so it’s an “either or” bet. In horse racing, a favorite, depending on field size, may have to defeat as many as five to 11 other horses. That makes it a more daunting task.

[Snip]

Thesis:

I believe what horse racing will need to do is fight fire with fire. If legal sports betting is offered with a 10 percent hold of 12 to 10, then the horse racing industry should reduce takeout on win, place and show betting also to 10 percent.

https://www.americasbestracing.net/g...-horse-betting

Richard Eng is the author of “Betting on Horse Racing for Dummies,” an introductory book for newcomers to the sport of horse racing.
Does this post imply that the poster Fred Mertz is Richard Eng, in real life?
__________________
Live to play another day.
thaskalos is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 01-18-2018, 12:15 PM   #13
Fred Mertz
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: Kentucky
Posts: 433
Quote:
Originally Posted by thaskalos View Post
Does this post imply that the poster Fred Mertz is Richard Eng, in real life?
Not at all. I included what I believe to be appropriate excerpts and attribution to the author on this never-ending topic.
Fred Mertz is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 01-18-2018, 12:48 PM   #14
thaskalos
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 28,388
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fred Mertz View Post
Not at all. I included what I believe to be appropriate excerpts and attribution to the author on this never-ending topic.
Sorry. When you began your initial post here with My column from New Year's Day...I honestly thought that you were the author of the piece.
__________________
Live to play another day.
thaskalos is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 01-18-2018, 02:05 PM   #15
green80
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Benton, La.
Posts: 1,841
Somebody may have some insight on this, with all the expenses a track has, could they show a profit reducing the take to 10%? 4.5%? Keep in mind that the track puts up a large percentage of the purse money, pays taxes on the money wagered, and has overhead like any business. Maybe someone in the know can tell us at what take % the track breaks even, then we could have a discussion about the take. Sure everybody wants a better deal, a lower take but what is realistic?
green80 is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Reply




Thread Tools
Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

» Advertisement
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:13 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Copyright 1999 - 2023 -- PaceAdvantage.Com -- All Rights Reserved
We are a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program
designed to provide a means for us to earn fees by linking to Amazon.com and affiliated sites.