Horse Racing Forum - PaceAdvantage.Com - Horse Racing Message Board

Go Back   Horse Racing Forum - PaceAdvantage.Com - Horse Racing Message Board > Thoroughbred Horse Racing Discussion > General Racing Discussion


Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
Old 12-22-2018, 03:46 PM   #1
chadk66
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Posts: 5,414
How racing has changed

So the other night I was looking through lifetime racing histories on some horses I trained over the years. The thing that really amazed me is how frequently horses were run back then. My horses generally ran every two weeks. Sometimes 10-12 days. Occasionally three weeks if races didn’t fill. And as a general rule I had sound horses all the time. I can’t honestly recall a vet scratch in all those years. We entered two days out for races then. It was pretty rare that I had to postpone an entry due to a physical ailment. I used no illegal meds ever. I never had a single bad test or so much as a bute overage. And I often hauled horses 500 miles to run and brought back. It just amazes me how much it’s changed. Granted the purses are far far higher now then they were then. But day rate is only 10-20% higher now at the tracks I ran at.
chadk66 is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 12-22-2018, 03:57 PM   #2
Dave Schwartz
 
Dave Schwartz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Reno, NV
Posts: 16,861
Chad,

Where did you race?

Last I heard the day rate in California was right at $200!
Dave Schwartz is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 12-22-2018, 04:18 PM   #3
chadk66
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Posts: 5,414
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dave Schwartz View Post
Chad,

Where did you race?

Last I heard the day rate in California was right at $200!
MN six months a year. Then different places in the fall. Rates were $40-50 then. Now about $60-70 I think
chadk66 is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 12-22-2018, 04:19 PM   #4
chadk66
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Posts: 5,414
I should add that’s MN rates
chadk66 is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 12-26-2018, 09:59 AM   #5
Hambletonian
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 341
Quote:
Originally Posted by chadk66 View Post
So the other night I was looking through lifetime racing histories on some horses I trained over the years. The thing that really amazed me is how frequently horses were run back then. My horses generally ran every two weeks. Sometimes 10-12 days. Occasionally three weeks if races didn’t fill. And as a general rule I had sound horses all the time. I can’t honestly recall a vet scratch in all those years. We entered two days out for races then. It was pretty rare that I had to postpone an entry due to a physical ailment. I used no illegal meds ever. I never had a single bad test or so much as a bute overage. And I often hauled horses 500 miles to run and brought back. It just amazes me how much it’s changed. Granted the purses are far far higher now then they were then. But day rate is only 10-20% higher now at the tracks I ran at.
My experience being a minor partner in some cheap claimers a decade ago is that most try to race every 10-14 days, mainly since that is the typical interval for the same race condition to come up. If you missed that race, you either had to move up in class, switch distance, or surface, or a combination of all three. Or wait until the next 10-14 cycle came up. If you couldn't keep up to that schedule it was usually due to injuries.

I was looking through some old DRFs from my misspent youth and was checking out the PPs of some of the hardknocking claimers that ran in NY. They races every 10 days to 2 weeks, and there were no form reversals. Horses would show gradual form curves, up and down, and most raced 20-25 times a year. I was a partner in only one horse that could have managed that, and she was bred by the trainer and had not been mucked with vet wise. She was dumb and slow, but sound until the day she retired. The others were so mucked up before we claimed them that the day rate ended up being overtaken by the vet work.
Hambletonian is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 12-26-2018, 11:07 AM   #6
jimmy m
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Altoona Ia
Posts: 86
I bought a whole bunch of Santa Anita,Del Mar and Hollywood Programs on Ebay from the 70s. A little different Subject.The Entries had a Substitute race listed.Im guessing in case a race came off the Turf.
jimmy m is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 12-26-2018, 01:23 PM   #7
biggestal99
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Posts: 4,520
Prolly need to revise title


"how North American racing has changed."


look at todays winner in the 7th at Happy Valley (HK)


raced 5 times to get into winning race shape in basically 10 weeks.


Today was go day and Happy Dragon delivered an easy win to his connections and chalk players around the world. (going away at the finish)


Thats the way they still race in drug free jurisdictions.


Allan
biggestal99 is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 12-26-2018, 01:25 PM   #8
Dave Schwartz
 
Dave Schwartz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Reno, NV
Posts: 16,861
Quote:
Originally Posted by chadk66 View Post
MN six months a year. Then different places in the fall. Rates were $40-50 then. Now about $60-70 I think
Wow! Quite a difference from California.
Dave Schwartz is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 12-26-2018, 06:00 PM   #9
chadk66
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Posts: 5,414
Yea costs on both coasts is much higher. I look back at the purses then and what they are now and I'm just blown away. Based on my experience dealing with my brother whom has owned horses for the past fifteen or twenty years, horses are as much or more dealing with lameness issues now then when I trained. He has a heart attack if the trainer wants to run his horse back sooner than three weeks. The mindset is totally different. And your run of the mill horses doesn't have any better win/in money percentage today than they did when I trained. I'm having a really hard time figuring out what caused this mentality and why they think it's beneficial to them to wait three weeks. If your race doesn't go or something your looking at four plus weeks between races. This way of thinking makes no sense to me unless your horse has health issues that require that much time. When looking back over my horses PP's I found several instances where my horses actually ran some of their best races on short rest. I had one horse that I tried on the grass and he hated it so much he pulled himself up in the second turn. Jock said he is perfectly fine just hated the grass. I ran him back a week later and he won for fun lol. They are weird animals that you have to find a way to listen to what they are telling you they need/want. I had one mare that ran 2nd in an allowance at Pimlico on April 19th. We put her on a van two days later and hauled her 48 hours to MN. My intention was to walk her for a few days then start galloping her back and see where she was a play it by ear. She had started running in late June the previous summer and ran steady until getting on that van. I was thinking she had to be getting pretty tired. Was even contemplating turning her out for awhile. Well two days walking her in the barn and she was about tearing the damn place down. Couldn't even walk her. So I took her to the track so she didn't kill somebody lol. She was so full of herself and you could tell she was flat glad to be home. So I said piss on it and entered her and she ran on May 3rd in an allowance race. Won for fun. That was 14 days between races with a 48 hour van ride. She ended up running until Nov. Had a win, couple seconds and several thirds. Ran in MN, Canada and Arlington during that time. She was then given the winter off. The next spring we brought her back and She won a stakes race in her third or fourth out. If we did that now days we would be locked up lol. She flat loved to run.


I should add she ran five years. Seven outs as a two year old, Three wins, a second and a third. Ten starts as a three year old, A wind, three seconds and a third. At four she had 22 starts, three winds, four seconds and seven thirds. At five she ran four times. One win and a third. At six she ran seven times with two seconds. She had a mild bow after the four races at five. She was fixing to have a hell of a good summer the way she was running. Just getting better all the time. Never really was the same after.

Last edited by chadk66; 12-26-2018 at 06:06 PM.
chadk66 is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 01-14-2019, 11:02 AM   #10
Thomas Roulston
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Lakehurst, NJ
Posts: 1,035
But the biggest change from my perspective is how much shorter the races have become, at least on the dirt anyway.

The second biggest change I have noticed is that turf sprints, which were essentially nonexistent when I became old enough to go to the track, are now a staple (referring to NYRA specifically here - and indeed this is why they converted the inner dirt track at Aqueduct back to a turf course, so that 6-furlong turf races could be run there).
Thomas Roulston is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Reply




Thread Tools
Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

» Advertisement
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:58 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Copyright 1999 - 2023 -- PaceAdvantage.Com -- All Rights Reserved
We are a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program
designed to provide a means for us to earn fees by linking to Amazon.com and affiliated sites.