Horse Racing Forum - PaceAdvantage.Com - Horse Racing Message Board

Go Back   Horse Racing Forum - PaceAdvantage.Com - Horse Racing Message Board > Thoroughbred Horse Racing Discussion > General Racing Discussion


Reply
 
Thread Tools Rating: Thread Rating: 15 votes, 4.20 average.
Old 11-26-2014, 02:59 PM   #16
Stillriledup
Veteran
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 25,607
Quote:
Originally Posted by cj
I thought we had a thread for this! You can find threads from 20 years ago but not the DQ thread? Come on, man.

EDIT: Merged

Sorry. Forgot about this. Out of sight, out of mind. My bad.
Stillriledup is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 11-26-2014, 09:33 PM   #17
thespaah
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 7,510
Quote:
Originally Posted by outofthebox
This is the track i race at. I cringe every time i'm involved with an inquiry. There are a lot of squeeze jobs going on into the turn because of horses switching leads and dropping down naturally. It seems if a jockey is half in going into the turn and feels the outside pressure, he is going to grab and take hold. This is what seemed to happen here.
Is this due to inexperienced or "less skilled" riders? Or is it an issue of the jockeys "playing the game" of trying to get the attention of the Stewards with the idea of having the Stews give them a position?
thespaah is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 11-26-2014, 09:36 PM   #18
thespaah
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 7,510
Quote:
Originally Posted by Stillriledup
Sorry. Forgot about this. Out of sight, out of mind. My bad.
Off to the Principal's office with you!!!!!!!
thespaah is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 11-28-2014, 02:04 PM   #19
Stillriledup
Veteran
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 25,607
Frivilous foul claim by E Vaz Race 4 Parx today. This is embarrassing, jocks should be fined for this type of stuff.

Last edited by Stillriledup; 11-28-2014 at 02:07 PM.
Stillriledup is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 11-28-2014, 02:05 PM   #20
cj
@TimeformUSfigs
 
cj's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Moore, OK
Posts: 46,802
Quote:
Originally Posted by Stillriledup
Frivilous foul claim by Frankie Pennington Race 4 Parx today. This is embarrassing, jocks should be fined for this type of stuff.
Ummm...they are.
cj is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 11-28-2014, 02:08 PM   #21
Stillriledup
Veteran
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 25,607
Quote:
Originally Posted by cj
Ummm...they are.
I was wrong about Pennington, it was Vaz who had the frivilous claim.
Stillriledup is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 12-02-2014, 05:28 PM   #22
Stillriledup
Veteran
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 25,607
Bizarre DQ at Zia in Race 8 today (Dec 2), the horse who caused the interference was placed first and a horse who did nothing was placed out of the money?
Stillriledup is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 12-02-2014, 05:30 PM   #23
cj
@TimeformUSfigs
 
cj's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Moore, OK
Posts: 46,802
Quote:
Originally Posted by Stillriledup
Bizarre DQ at Zia in Race 8 today (Dec 2), the horse who caused the interference was placed first and a horse who did nothing was placed out of the money?
Something tells me there is more to it than this. I'll watch later.
cj is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 12-02-2014, 05:34 PM   #24
Stillriledup
Veteran
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 25,607
Quote:
Originally Posted by cj
Something tells me there is more to it than this. I'll watch later.
They seemed to dq the wrong horse, i didnt see where the winner did anything wrong, he never bumped anyone so its all greek to me.
Stillriledup is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 12-02-2014, 05:44 PM   #25
cj
@TimeformUSfigs
 
cj's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Moore, OK
Posts: 46,802
Quote:
Originally Posted by Stillriledup
They seemed to dq the wrong horse, i didnt see where the winner did anything wrong, he never bumped anyone so its all greek to me.
I would guess the reasoning was the 5 forced the 4 in at the start, which in turn caused the 1-2-3 to be stopped pretty hard. I'm not sure I agree, but I can see why it was called.
cj is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 12-02-2014, 05:47 PM   #26
Stillriledup
Veteran
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 25,607
Quote:
Originally Posted by cj
I would guess the reasoning was the 5 forced the 4 in at the start, which in turn caused the 1-2-3 to be stopped pretty hard. I'm not sure I agree, but I can see why it was called.
I didnt see where the 5 did anything wrong and even if you can make a case the 5 was at fault, the 4 was also at least partly at fault and needed to come down too. Not sure how anyone can look at that and say the 4 was blameless for his jock completely overreacting to something that didnt happen, i have a problem with that DQ. If you take down the 5, you gotta take the 4 with him.
Stillriledup is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 12-02-2014, 05:51 PM   #27
cj
@TimeformUSfigs
 
cj's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Moore, OK
Posts: 46,802
Quote:
Originally Posted by Stillriledup
I didnt see where the 5 did anything wrong and even if you can make a case the 5 was at fault, the 4 was also at least partly at fault and needed to come down too. Not sure how anyone can look at that and say the 4 was blameless for his jock completely overreacting to something that didnt happen, i have a problem with that DQ. If you take down the 5, you gotta take the 4 with him.
I tend to agree, I thought the 4 was at least as much to blame. I hate to say it, but I think the 1-5 odds had an impact.
cj is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 12-02-2014, 05:52 PM   #28
Stillriledup
Veteran
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 25,607
Quote:
Originally Posted by cj
I tend to agree, I thought the 4 was at least as much to blame. I hate to say it, but I think the 1-5 odds had an impact.
I was thinking that the track wouldnt want to have to pay out a minus show pool and the DQ of the 4 would be made, i saw the inquiry and just thought it was on the 4 and was shocked that it was on the 5.

Rough DQ if you had the winner, that's a hard way to not get paid.
Stillriledup is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 12-02-2014, 06:17 PM   #29
Gapfire
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 899
Just looked at the replay, and thought the 4 caused most of the problems, The 5 was coming over as well, but the 4 moved in, and caused the foul before the 5 came over.
Bad DQ, and the 1/5 shot gets rewarded for being the main culprit.
__________________
2011 P.A.I.H.L. Finalist & 2012 PA Day 2 Breeders' Cup Contest Winner - Proud Sponsor 2014 Gapfire Ridersup Contest
https://www.gapfire.com/free.htm
Gapfire is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 12-02-2014, 08:45 PM   #30
appistappis
longshot kick de bucket
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: niagara falls ont.
Posts: 1,218
the objection was 1 on 5.
__________________
let the fools have their tar tar sauce.
appistappis is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Reply




Thread Tools
Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

» Advertisement
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:17 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Copyright 1999 - 2023 -- PaceAdvantage.Com -- All Rights Reserved
We are a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program
designed to provide a means for us to earn fees by linking to Amazon.com and affiliated sites.