Horse Racing Forum - PaceAdvantage.Com - Horse Racing Message Board

Go Back   Horse Racing Forum - PaceAdvantage.Com - Horse Racing Message Board > Thoroughbred Horse Racing Discussion > General Racing Discussion


Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
Old 07-31-2017, 05:19 PM   #31
cj
@TimeformUSfigs
 
cj's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Moore, OK
Posts: 46,829
Quote:
Originally Posted by dilanesp View Post
When I was in Oklahoma on Friday night for my mother's horse's race, the track's past performances on its quarter horse races had exact final times. Seems to me if a track in Oklahoma can publish exact QH times in it's PP's, same thing can be done for major league thoroughbred tracks.

I'm with you, cj.
Should have said something, we (wife + me) actually considered going to FMT Saturday since it was closing day.
cj is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 07-31-2017, 05:50 PM   #32
JustRalph
Just another Facist
 
JustRalph's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Now in Houston
Posts: 52,818
I don't think they are going to take it away from him now.......
__________________
WE ARE THE DUMBEST COUNTRY ON THE PLANET!
JustRalph is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 07-31-2017, 05:52 PM   #33
cj
@TimeformUSfigs
 
cj's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Moore, OK
Posts: 46,829
Quote:
Originally Posted by JustRalph View Post
I don't think they are going to take it away from him now.......
As I've said, not really my point. I don't care about the margin, just would like to see things done right now. It has only been 44 years since then.
cj is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 07-31-2017, 06:36 PM   #34
theotherside
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: buffalo new york
Posts: 127
not 31 lengths

Before you tell me my point is irrelevant let me say 2:24 a record that will stand forever at belmont park.
theotherside is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 07-31-2017, 07:20 PM   #35
Afleet
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: Missouri
Posts: 2,190
Quote:
Originally Posted by theotherside View Post
Before you tell me my point is irrelevant let me say 2:24 a record that will stand forever at belmont park.
I predict a Navarro horse will break this record
Afleet is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 07-31-2017, 07:34 PM   #36
JustRalph
Just another Facist
 
JustRalph's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Now in Houston
Posts: 52,818
Quote:
Originally Posted by cj View Post
As I've said, not really my point. I don't care about the margin, just would like to see things done right now. It has only been 44 years since then.
I'm allowed to bust ur balls a little

Are you suggesting horse racing hasn't improved in 44 years? Shocked I tell you!
__________________
WE ARE THE DUMBEST COUNTRY ON THE PLANET!
JustRalph is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 07-31-2017, 07:49 PM   #37
luisbe
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 378
Quote:
Originally Posted by cj View Post
The photo companies calculate the time difference between the winner and each horse as they hit the wire and apply a flawed formula to convert it to lengths.
I agree that's flawed. Beaten lengths should be the distance between the first and second as the winner hits the wire. There should be a frozen picture and the calculus would be simple, just a ruler can be used as measure.
luisbe is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 07-31-2017, 08:14 PM   #38
dilanesp
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 8,798
Quote:
Originally Posted by cj View Post
Should have said something, we (wife + me) actually considered going to FMT Saturday since it was closing day.
I thought of posting something but I thought it was a little corny.

My mother is 87 years old. She's dabbled in horse ownership for a couple of years, and had one decent sort who had some seconds in Maiden races at Gulfstream before breaking down after a race.

But she has a nice filly now named Pound the Table. She had a troubled trip in her last start and finished second, so I thought she was sitting on a win and went out to Fair Meadows for the Friday night card. Horse dead-heated for the win in the first race, giving my mother her first ever race win. She flew out to see it too, and she got her picture taken and everything. It was a lot of fun.

Horse figures to run again against winners at Remington. We'll see how it goes.
dilanesp is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 07-31-2017, 09:19 PM   #39
cj
@TimeformUSfigs
 
cj's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Moore, OK
Posts: 46,829
Quote:
Originally Posted by JustRalph View Post
I'm allowed to bust ur balls a little

Are you suggesting horse racing hasn't improved in 44 years? Shocked I tell you!
I didn't take it that way buddy!

And yes, that is exactly the point. Scary.
cj is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 07-31-2017, 09:20 PM   #40
cj
@TimeformUSfigs
 
cj's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Moore, OK
Posts: 46,829
Quote:
Originally Posted by theotherside View Post
Before you tell me my point is irrelevant let me say 2:24 a record that will stand forever at belmont park.
I hope not, one of the best records in sports and it is real.
cj is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 07-31-2017, 09:24 PM   #41
cj
@TimeformUSfigs
 
cj's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Moore, OK
Posts: 46,829
Quote:
Originally Posted by dilanesp View Post
I thought of posting something but I thought it was a little corny.

My mother is 87 years old. She's dabbled in horse ownership for a couple of years, and had one decent sort who had some seconds in Maiden races at Gulfstream before breaking down after a race.

But she has a nice filly now named Pound the Table. She had a troubled trip in her last start and finished second, so I thought she was sitting on a win and went out to Fair Meadows for the Friday night card. Horse dead-heated for the win in the first race, giving my mother her first ever race win. She flew out to see it too, and she got her picture taken and everything. It was a lot of fun.

Horse figures to run again against winners at Remington. We'll see how it goes.
Very cool. I'll keep an eye out for her in the entries. That is much closer to me than FMT!

Attached Images
File Type: png FMT07282017R1.png (37.7 KB, 15 views)
cj is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 07-31-2017, 09:33 PM   #42
Lemon Drop Husker
Veteran
 
Lemon Drop Husker's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2014
Location: Lincoln, NE
Posts: 11,474
Does is it really matter once we get past 6, 7, or 8 lengths or more in short 3, 4, or 5 horse fields?
Lemon Drop Husker is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 07-31-2017, 09:40 PM   #43
MutuelClerk
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 2,472
CJ I believe you've calculated like a tremendous machine.
MutuelClerk is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 08-01-2017, 08:20 AM   #44
Fager Fan
Veteran
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 5,222
I love how the winning margin was so exact. Not 32 lengths, or 33 lengths, but 32 1/2 lengths. 😜
Fager Fan is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 08-01-2017, 12:08 PM   #45
Magister Ludi
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 441
The "length" unit of measure probably originated when someone, probably a caller, noticed that the distance between the infield fence uprights approximates the length of a horse. It was a way of quickly estimating, on the fly, the distance between horses.
Magister Ludi is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Reply





Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

» Advertisement
» Current Polls
Wh deserves to be the favorite? (last 4 figures)
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:10 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Copyright 1999 - 2023 -- PaceAdvantage.Com -- All Rights Reserved
We are a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program
designed to provide a means for us to earn fees by linking to Amazon.com and affiliated sites.