Quote:
Originally Posted by o_crunk
The primary customer of horse racing these days is state governments.
|
Which is more than half the reason it's a mess in many places.
It's an industry that's been doing everything it could to insulate itself from market forces for many years while at the same time being handcuffed by corrupt incompetent governments, corrupt incompetent internal politics and other entities that make it impossible to move fast enough even if someone finally does have a good idea.
In the real world not a single dollar of casino money would go towards horse racing, we would have been down to 15-20 tracks at most years ago, the free cash would ensure the pools were secure, tracks would either be competing with lower takes or at a minimum moving quickly to experiment with different take levels and bet types instead of raising the take to the level of the their dumbest competitor, and instead of giving a piece of the action to government, tracks would pay taxes on profits (if there were any).
It could all be done with minimal regulation to protect the consumer and a higher level regulation to protect the horses.
The entire thing would then sink or swim based on the merits of racing as a gambling option and the competence of the people running the tracks trying to make money. If it's supposed to sink, so be it, but I think it would flourish. It would just be smaller.
Of course this IS all fantasy because it makes way more sense than what we have now. So corrupt incompetent governments would never allow it and those sucking on the tit of casino money would fight it tooth and nail to keep their jobs and revenue.
Of course the untold millions (billions over time) now being used to prop up all these zombie tracks could then go towards solving some of our many social problems instead.
Sorry for the rant, but watching this industry die is no fun.