Horse Racing Forum - PaceAdvantage.Com - Horse Racing Message Board

Go Back   Horse Racing Forum - PaceAdvantage.Com - Horse Racing Message Board > Thoroughbred Horse Racing Discussion > Handicapping Software


Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
Old 06-03-2012, 12:50 PM   #1
dukeofperl
Registered User
 
dukeofperl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: sometines Phoenix, sometimes Los Angeles
Posts: 130
Calculating exotics payoffs

A forum search didn't find an existing thread that addresses calculating exotics payoffs (at least not with that search pattern) so I'll start a fresh thread.

I have a few questions for the forum and for the purpose of simplicity, I would like to focus this discussion on Super-Fectas (SF).

1) Does anyone have any experience in coding a program (the language doesn't matter) that calculates the payoffs for SF?

2) Does anyone know of any existing code that calculates SF payoffs that I could leverage?

3) What would I use for the basis? The W-P-S odds? The SF pool itself? Something else? All the above?

4) My gut says such a program would not be entirely accurate due to factors such as the track-take, late minute action and so forth. What would be a reasonable degree of accuracy for such a program?

5) Does anyone have the fundamental math for calculating SF payoffs? (regardless of the basis).

Your comments are welcome and appreciated.

Thanks, Duke
__________________
"She's long-n-tall, she weeps like a willow tree
she caught me in the woods and weeped all over me"

River Hip Woman ~ Charlie Musselwhite ~

~My avatar~
dukeofperl is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 06-03-2012, 01:01 PM   #2
davew
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 22,655
You can only calculate pay-offs by knowing how much is bet on the combination and total bet in the pool (knowing track take-out for this bet), and not even sure if you can do that with NET POOLS between US and Canadian tracks.

Many people have used estimated pay-off formulas, but they are rarely accurate.
davew is online now   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 06-03-2012, 01:16 PM   #3
dukeofperl
Registered User
 
dukeofperl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: sometines Phoenix, sometimes Los Angeles
Posts: 130
Quote:
Originally Posted by davew
You can only calculate pay-offs by knowing how much is bet on the combination and total bet in the pool (knowing track take-out for this bet), and not even sure if you can do that with NET POOLS between US and Canadian tracks.

Many people have used estimated pay-off formulas, but they are rarely accurate.
Thanks davew -- I suspected there would be accuracy problems just not sure to what degree.
__________________
"She's long-n-tall, she weeps like a willow tree
she caught me in the woods and weeped all over me"

River Hip Woman ~ Charlie Musselwhite ~

~My avatar~
dukeofperl is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 06-08-2012, 01:32 AM   #4
MightBeSosa
Veteran
 
MightBeSosa's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 515
Not hard to do using the win odds, but the variance around 'expected value' would be gigantic.

What use would you put this to? Easy enough to figure expected super payoffs, they come in only three sizes, small, large, and damn.
MightBeSosa is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 06-08-2012, 02:20 AM   #5
vegasone
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 531
Probably the best way to estimate the value of an exotic is thru past history with a database of closing odds and actual payoffs.

Exactas are easiest even by guesstimating from actual experience.

Last edited by vegasone; 06-08-2012 at 02:21 AM.
vegasone is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 06-08-2012, 12:29 PM   #6
dhcPlayer
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 10
http://www.paceadvantage.com/forum/a...p/t-45134.html
dhcPlayer is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 06-08-2012, 02:02 PM   #7
raybo
EXCEL with SUPERFECTAS
 
raybo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 10,206
Duke,

While you might somehow come up with a mathematical formula to estimate superfecta payouts, it would undoubtedly be grossly inaccurate.

There are just too many variables, some of which are estimations in themselves, such as average pool sizes, at every track (they all differ), and even an average is not good enough because individual races on a card can mess with those averages, what class of race it is, what the field size is, where on the card it falls, etc..

On top of that, which combination of horses are you going to project a payout for? There are as many payout possibilities as there are finishing combinations, although some combinations will have similar payoffs.

Then you have to have a good feel of how players play at each track you play. Some tracks have fewer knowledgeable superfecta players than others, for example. Some tracks have super players that structure larger tickets, because of the larger average superfecta pools. Etc..

The best way I have found to estimate super payouts is through experience at a particular track, and having looked at thousands of payouts, corresponding to odds rankings, rather than odds values. The rankings allow much more accurate projections than do actual odds values. So, you might do well to start there, with the rankings of the odds. Then on a particular superfecta ticket, project what the lowest 4 odds rankings on your ticket should pay. Once you have that estimated then you will know whether or not to play the super in the first place. If that minimum expected payout is high enough, for your hit rate, then it is a play, and all other combinations will almost always pay more than that one, if the minimum is too low then you pass. That's my method, anyway, and it has worked well for me for many years.
__________________
Ray
Horseracing's like the stock market except you don't have to wait as long to go broke.

Excel Spreadsheet Handicapping Forum

Charter Member: Horseplayers Association of North America
raybo is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 06-09-2012, 11:35 AM   #8
dukeofperl
Registered User
 
dukeofperl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: sometines Phoenix, sometimes Los Angeles
Posts: 130
Thanks for all the replies (and the link dhcPlayer).

My intent is (was) to put together a program that calculates exotics based on the wps odds.

However, as I suspected, and many people have pointed out, there are just too many variables and unknowns to allow for accuracy that is acceptable.

I think the best approach, as mentioned by vegasone, is a db of known payoffs vs. closing wps odds ... an idea I might entertain and one that might narrow things down finer than small-large-damn! (thanks for the laugh MightBeSosa -- I needed it ).

And I agree raybo, experience trumps all and having been a railbird for 50 years, I probably should already know how to do this in my head.


Thanks again
__________________
"She's long-n-tall, she weeps like a willow tree
she caught me in the woods and weeped all over me"

River Hip Woman ~ Charlie Musselwhite ~

~My avatar~
dukeofperl is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Reply





Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

» Advertisement
» Current Polls
Wh deserves to be the favorite? (last 4 figures)
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:59 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Copyright 1999 - 2023 -- PaceAdvantage.Com -- All Rights Reserved
We are a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program
designed to provide a means for us to earn fees by linking to Amazon.com and affiliated sites.