Horse Racing Forum - PaceAdvantage.Com - Horse Racing Message Board

Go Back   Horse Racing Forum - PaceAdvantage.Com - Horse Racing Message Board > Thoroughbred Horse Racing Discussion > General Racing Discussion


Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
Old 12-10-2009, 07:13 PM   #1
InsideThePylons-MW
Registered User
 
InsideThePylons-MW's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 1,572
How can Vic repeat what the stewards tell him to say with a straight face?

7th race Hol

4 makes a left hand turn 100 yds out of gate almost knocking down 1 and 3.

It's a 4 horse field so 5 wins the race, 3 runs 2nd, 4 is third and 1 a distant 4th.

It was 100% without a doubt obvious that 4 fouled 1 and 3 badly.

If you watch the replay closely, you can see 1 bobble to where she clipped heels, banged a leg, grabbed a quarter, etc.

Judges said 1 was fouled but because 1 was beaten badly (10 lengths?) there is no change.

So let me get this straight.........A horse can foul another horse at the start, possibly hurt the other horse, but so long as the fouled horse doesn't race good the rest of the way there will be no change?

If 1 would have pulled up due to the foul, would 4 have come down?


WTF is going on with CA racing?

Total incompetence!
InsideThePylons-MW is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 12-10-2009, 07:52 PM   #2
cj
@TimeformUSfigs
 
cj's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Moore, OK
Posts: 46,828
California racing, especially Southern Cal, is the laughing stock of the sport right now. They were very close to canceling a Saturday card due to lack of interest from horsemen.
cj is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 12-10-2009, 08:32 PM   #3
cj
@TimeformUSfigs
 
cj's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Moore, OK
Posts: 46,828
According to the chart, "The stewards conducted an inquiry into the incident in the early running but made no change when they ruled SEEDLESS overreacted to some outside pressure past the three quarter mile pole".
cj is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 12-10-2009, 08:50 PM   #4
Stillriledup
Veteran
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 25,607
I actually like the No call on this one. Just pay off the winners and let the administrative stuff happen behind the scenes.
Stillriledup is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 12-10-2009, 09:02 PM   #5
Show Me the Wire
Quintessential guru
 
Show Me the Wire's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Posts: 11,254
Quote:
Originally Posted by cj
California racing, especially Southern Cal, is the laughing stock of the sport right now. They were very close to canceling a Saturday card due to lack of interest from horsemen.

After today's events I agree.
Show Me the Wire is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 12-10-2009, 09:03 PM   #6
v j stauffer
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 4,284
Quote:
Originally Posted by cj
California racing, especially Southern Cal, is the laughing stock of the sport right now. They were very close to canceling a Saturday card due to lack of interest from horsemen.
That is totally untrue. At no point was the Saturday card in danger of being cancelled.
v j stauffer is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 12-10-2009, 09:13 PM   #7
tunasteve
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 5
It may not have been in danger of cancellation, but in order to keep the card from being scrapped they had to go with three fields of 5 and three 6s - and needed an extra day to fill at that. Would an early weekday card have survived with such light interest from horsemen?
tunasteve is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 12-10-2009, 09:17 PM   #8
Saratoga_Mike
Veteran
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 9,893
Quote:
Originally Posted by v j stauffer
That is totally untrue. At no point was the Saturday card in danger of being cancelled.
CJ would never post an untruth - he's a moderator and there aren't many of those.
Saratoga_Mike is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 12-10-2009, 09:35 PM   #9
v j stauffer
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 4,284
Quote:
Originally Posted by Saratoga_Mike
CJ would never post an untruth - he's a moderator and there aren't many of those.
You're right he's royalty. Incorrect is a better word.
v j stauffer is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 12-10-2009, 09:46 PM   #10
bigmack
Registered User
 
bigmack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Bird Rock
Posts: 16,697
Quote:
Originally Posted by cj
SEEDLESS overreacted to some outside pressure past the three quarter mile pole".
Outside pressure? She was the outside and with her left turn made no inside very quickly for everyone. The 1 had to do a complete 'Hi-Ho-Silver'.

bigmack is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 12-10-2009, 09:49 PM   #11
InsideThePylons-MW
Registered User
 
InsideThePylons-MW's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 1,572
Quote:
Originally Posted by Stillriledup
I actually like the No call on this one. Just pay off the winners and let the administrative stuff happen behind the scenes.
I think a vast majority would like no calls every time unless the foul is intentional.

But, that's not the rules.

If the 1 was Zenyatta and after being obviously fouled very hard by the 4, would they have taken the 4 down?

If your answer is yes, then the judges are incompetent.
InsideThePylons-MW is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 12-10-2009, 09:52 PM   #12
InsideThePylons-MW
Registered User
 
InsideThePylons-MW's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 1,572
Quote:
Originally Posted by cj
According to the chart, "The stewards conducted an inquiry into the incident in the early running but made no change when they ruled SEEDLESS overreacted to some outside pressure past the three quarter mile pole".
It looks like the chart caller couldn't repeat what the stewards thought so he made up something that makes absolutely no sense which keeps his job safe.
InsideThePylons-MW is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 12-10-2009, 09:53 PM   #13
Spalding No!
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 3,053
Quote:
Originally Posted by v j stauffer
That is totally untrue. At no point was the Saturday card in danger of being cancelled.
Easy now...he might just have his dates mixed up...

Maybe we just need to tell him its December, not April.
Spalding No! is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 12-10-2009, 09:53 PM   #14
v j stauffer
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 4,284
Quote:
Originally Posted by InsideThePylons-MW
It looks like the chart caller couldn't repeat what the stewards thought so he made up something that makes absolutely no sense which keeps his job safe.
That's exactly what the stewards said.
v j stauffer is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 12-10-2009, 09:54 PM   #15
Saratoga_Mike
Veteran
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 9,893
That was criminal. The 4 obviously should have been taken down.
Saratoga_Mike is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Reply





Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

» Advertisement
» Current Polls
Wh deserves to be the favorite? (last 4 figures)
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:58 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Copyright 1999 - 2023 -- PaceAdvantage.Com -- All Rights Reserved
We are a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program
designed to provide a means for us to earn fees by linking to Amazon.com and affiliated sites.