|
|
12-29-2016, 11:56 AM
|
#301
|
@TimeformUSfigs
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Moore, OK
Posts: 46,816
|
http://www.equibase.com/premium/char...16&cy=USA&rn=3
The final time in the chart is three seconds too fast according to the video replay, and if I had to pick one or the other I'd bet my house the video is much closer to the real time and probably accurate. I have no idea where the chart time came from.
|
|
|
12-29-2016, 01:26 PM
|
#302
|
@TimeformUSfigs
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Moore, OK
Posts: 46,816
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by cj
http://www.equibase.com/premium/char...16&cy=USA&rn=3
The final time in the chart is three seconds too fast according to the video replay, and if I had to pick one or the other I'd bet my house the video is much closer to the real time and probably accurate. I have no idea where the chart time came from.
|
It has been corrected now to 1:22.90.
|
|
|
12-29-2016, 05:07 PM
|
#303
|
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 2,105
|
The first call in the last at TP last night is 2 seconds too fast.
|
|
|
12-30-2016, 03:06 PM
|
#304
|
@TimeformUSfigs
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Moore, OK
Posts: 46,816
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by sjk
The first call in the last at TP last night is 2 seconds too fast.
|
Another that is just a typo too. Sad really, no reason these things aren't caught. Timer malfunctions are one thing but these are just carelessness. The QC is obviously inadequate.
Last edited by cj; 12-30-2016 at 03:08 PM.
|
|
|
01-04-2017, 02:20 PM
|
#305
|
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2016
Posts: 109
|
Think most are just made up out of thin air.
Portland 1-01-2017 race 3 - could have gotten a better final time with a sundial.
Mahoning 1-03-2017 race 3 - all wrong.
I think no times are better than wrong times.
|
|
|
01-04-2017, 02:26 PM
|
#306
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 28,388
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by cj
Another that is just a typo too. Sad really, no reason these things aren't caught. Timer malfunctions are one thing but these are just carelessness. The QC is obviously inadequate.
|
If a 2 SECOND mistake isn't noticed...then, how could a mistake of a couple of fifths of-a-second be noticed? And this, in a game where winning and losing are often separated by necks and noses.
|
|
|
01-04-2017, 05:15 PM
|
#307
|
@TimeformUSfigs
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Moore, OK
Posts: 46,816
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Prof.Factor
Think most are just made up out of thin air.
Portland 1-01-2017 race 3 - could have gotten a better final time with a sundial.
Mahoning 1-03-2017 race 3 - all wrong.
I think no times are better than wrong times.
|
These two tracks are serial offenders for malfunctions and ridiculous hand times.
|
|
|
01-04-2017, 05:18 PM
|
#308
|
@TimeformUSfigs
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Moore, OK
Posts: 46,816
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by thaskalos
If a 2 SECOND mistake isn't noticed...then, how could a mistake of a couple of fifths of-a-second be noticed? And this, in a game where winning and losing are often separated by necks and noses.
|
Very true. I'm sure some slip by me for sure. I catch some of the smaller ones because I look at the race dynamics and the pace figures next to the speed figures so a few fifths can make a big difference, but still, there has to be a better way than just having a guy type them in and they are never checked. It is 2017 and we can't have the times automated into the Equibase system? I find that very hard to believe.
|
|
|
01-04-2017, 05:44 PM
|
#309
|
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Youngstown, Ohio
Posts: 2,053
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Prof.Factor
Think most are just made up out of thin air.
Portland 1-01-2017 race 3 - could have gotten a better final time with a sundial.
Mahoning 1-03-2017 race 3 - all wrong.
I think no times are better than wrong times.
|
Race 3 at MVR ended up being hand times because #1 U and Tequila lost her jockey while on the lead near the quarter pole.
RR
__________________
Jackpot Pick 6 bets will soon be as popular as Buggy Whips and Dial-up Internet.
|
|
|
01-04-2017, 05:53 PM
|
#310
|
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 2,105
|
I think the 22.0 on the teletimer is right and I made the second call 46.2. (chart shows NA)
Do you think the horse was a winner if the jock stayed on?
Last edited by sjk; 01-04-2017 at 05:56 PM.
|
|
|
01-04-2017, 06:00 PM
|
#311
|
@TimeformUSfigs
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Moore, OK
Posts: 46,816
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by sjk
I think the 22.0 on the teletimer is right and I made the second call 46.2. (chart shows NA)
Do you think the horse was a winner if the jock stayed on?
|
Charts I saw and my data feed don't have a half mile time. I agree the 22.0 is correct, jockey was still on at the point.
(I see you edited as I was posting, ignore )
|
|
|
01-04-2017, 06:12 PM
|
#312
|
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Youngstown, Ohio
Posts: 2,053
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by sjk
I think the 22.0 on the teletimer is right and I made the second call 46.2. (chart shows NA)
Do you think the horse was a winner if the jock stayed on?
|
Quinones loves to send horses ala Martin Pedroza or Pat Valenzuela. Put away #3 early. Eventual winner #4 and runner up #8 should have been closer to that pace. So I see a 3 horse photo. She did win easy without that pesky jock on her back though.
RR
__________________
Jackpot Pick 6 bets will soon be as popular as Buggy Whips and Dial-up Internet.
Last edited by rrpic6; 01-04-2017 at 06:15 PM.
|
|
|
03-10-2017, 11:50 PM
|
#313
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 4,655
|
I had wondered why 6 furlong splits are so much slower at Mahoning than the same leader(s) would post at 5 or 5.5 furlongs. At some other tracks, the longer straight-run (and no elbow factoring into the initial fraction) result in comparatively quicker splits at the 6 fur distance.
Last week Mahoning's clocker, a friend of mine, cleared up the mystery by informing me that the actual run-up at 6 furlongs there is nearly non-existent.
As for Mahoning's route fractions, I generally ignore them and rely strictly on visual observation and a race's apparent speed content.
|
|
|
03-11-2017, 07:45 AM
|
#314
|
Shouttheodds
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 233
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by mountainman
I had wondered why 6 furlong splits are so much slower at Mahoning than the same leader(s) would post at 5 or 5.5 furlongs. At some other tracks, the longer straight-run (and no elbow factoring into the initial fraction) result in comparatively quicker splits at the 6 fur distance.
Last week Mahoning's clocker, a friend of mine, cleared up the mystery by informing me that the actual run-up at 6 furlongs there is nearly non-existent.
As for Mahoning's route fractions, I generally ignore them and rely strictly on visual observation and a race's apparent speed content.
|
To further your point:
Average opening two quarter splits of winners so far this season =
6.0F - 23.55 - 23.91
5.5F - 22.75 - 24.38
5.0F - 22.58 - 24.67
__________________
gib
Twitter: @shouttheodds
|
|
|
05-03-2017, 07:39 PM
|
#315
|
vaguely on topic...
Join Date: May 2016
Posts: 104
|
amazing that fonner park still times in 1/5ths; seems egregious
|
|
|
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
Rate This Thread |
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|