Liberal Corner

[horses4courses]

Originally Posted by JustRalph

Classy post......

Thanks.....high praise indeed.
After all, you set such high standards yourself.

[horses4courses]

[RunForTheRoses]

This whole MFin thread:

[woodtoo]

Originally Posted by RunForTheRoses

This whole MFin thread:

You knew it was wrong when you stepped in.

[reckless]

A serious question for h4c ...

Do you and your friends on the fringe really, truly and sincerely believe all of this Trump bashing --thanks to the kooks in Occupy Democrats, owned and funded by self-hating Jew, world-wide financial criminal and 1 per center, George Soros-- will have any affect to those of sound intellect and strong backs?

Assuming that you answer this polite request, we ask for much more than a simple 'yes', preferring something along the lines befitting your intellect and integrity for an honest debate.

Thanks.

[PaceAdvantage]

Originally Posted by horses4courses

I watched the speech. Not once did I specifically hear Trump claim these numbers were all his doing nor did I specifically hear him use the word *I* or take credit for it in any SPECIFIC way.

He just read the numbers. He did not add "LOOK WHAT I DID" or "THIS IS WHAT MY ADMINISTRATION HAS LED TO"

He did absolutely none of that. Did you even listen to the speech?

[wisconsin]

Originally Posted by PaceAdvantage

Did you even listen to the speech?

Mike, you know they don't have to listen, because the MSM will interpret it for them.

[boxcar]

Originally Posted by PaceAdvantage

I watched the speech. Not once did I specifically hear Trump claim these numbers were all his doing nor did I specifically hear him use the word *I* or take credit for it in any SPECIFIC way.

He just read the numbers. He did not add "LOOK WHAT I DID" or "THIS IS WHAT MY ADMINISTRATION HAS LED TO"

He did absolutely none of that. Did you even listen to the speech?

Just as interesting aside and by way of very sharp contrast, since you brought up the "I" word: I think El Rushbo said yesterday that Trump used the "I" word only 19 times in his long speech. Obama, conversely, in his first SOTU, used the word "I" or some form of it (my, mine, etc.) around 275 times. It doesn't take a genius to see which president was truly full of himself because his cup overfloweth with large doses of megalomania.

[Tom]

What Trump gave was a "state of the union" speech.
He gave out fact that are the current"state of the union.

Horsey obvious has nothing of any substance to argue with, so he resorts to cartoons. Must suck to be so wrong and know it!

[davew]

Originally Posted by Tom

What Trump gave was a "state of the union" speech.
He gave out fact that are the current"state of the union.

Horsey obvious has nothing of any substance to argue with, so he resorts to cartoons. Must suck to be so wrong and know it!

It sucks even more to be so wrong and not know it. It is just another year until Nancy Pelosi returns to her rightful place as speaker of the house.

[riskman]

Its so entertaining to watch Americans fight so publicly and so viciously over Trump.Our Rulers are indeed masters of corruption, and secrecy is a basic tool of their control of society, as is basic and repeated lying, and false narratives to pacify the masses.

[horses4courses]

Originally Posted by PaceAdvantage

I watched the speech. Not once did I specifically hear Trump claim these numbers were all his doing nor did I specifically hear him use the word *I* or take credit for it in any SPECIFIC way.

He just read the numbers. He did not add "LOOK WHAT I DID" or "THIS IS WHAT MY ADMINISTRATION HAS LED TO"

He did absolutely none of that. Did you even listen to the speech?

No rocket science degree required to realize that any time
Trump refers to a bull market, he is taking credit for it.

It's just who he is, and how he rolls.

[horses4courses]

Originally Posted by reckless

A serious question for h4c ...

Do you and your friends on the fringe really, truly and sincerely believe all of this Trump bashing --thanks to the kooks in Occupy Democrats, owned and funded by self-hating Jew, world-wide financial criminal and 1 per center, George Soros-- will have any affect to those of sound intellect and strong backs?

Assuming that you answer this polite request, we ask for much more than a simple 'yes', preferring something along the lines befitting your intellect and integrity for an honest debate.

Thanks.

I have no chance whatsoever of swaying opinion here.
Won't stop me from trying, though.

Those with sound intellect are, more than likely, left of center.
This is a factor of at least two thirds of college grads being anti-Trump.

"Strong backs" is another term for damned stubborn.
That you all are. This doesn't mean you're on the right side.

It all comes down to history.
You point to the Chappaquiddicks, Lewinskis, and Benghazis.
I point to McCarthyism, Nixon, and Cheney's supposed WMDs.
While our outlooks run perpendicular - our desires for this country
to prosper are basically the same. We just approach it differently.

[Tom]

Keep telling yourself that.
Nixon and McCarthy were warped INDIVIDUALS.

The left is bat-shit useless solidarity.
I have never seen one left-leaning dingbat on this board ever disagree with the party line.

[PaceAdvantage]

Originally Posted by Tom

I have never seen one left-leaning dingbat on this board ever disagree with the party line.

It's actually an admirable trait when you think about it...wish Republicans were more like that...