Horse Racing Forum - PaceAdvantage.Com - Horse Racing Message Board

Go Back   Horse Racing Forum - PaceAdvantage.Com - Horse Racing Message Board > Thoroughbred Horse Racing Discussion > General Racing Discussion


Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
Old 08-19-2010, 11:21 AM   #61
andymays
Veteran
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 9,908
Quote:
Originally Posted by jballscalls
Andy,

do you include Frank in your emails?
I think you were on yesterdays list. There should have been at least three direct to Santa Anita for the different departments.
andymays is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 08-19-2010, 11:32 AM   #62
jballscalls
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 3,630
Quote:
Originally Posted by andymays
I think you were on yesterdays list. There should have been at least three direct to Santa Anita for the different departments.
oh goodie!
__________________
Check out my daily horse racing podcast The BARN at www.betamerica.com/barn
jballscalls is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 08-19-2010, 11:33 AM   #63
GMB@BP
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Dark Side of the Moon
Posts: 5,870
Quote:
Originally Posted by andymays
I think you were on yesterdays list. There should have been at least three direct to Santa Anita for the different departments.
So does this dirt make it economically feasible to race in Ca?

If not this will do nothing for the product other than what little racing will occur will be more legit. Its still gonna be 7.5 horses per race.
GMB@BP is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 08-19-2010, 11:34 AM   #64
andymays
Veteran
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 9,908
Quote:
Originally Posted by jballscalls
oh goodie!
Think of it as a status symbol. You're special.
andymays is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 08-19-2010, 11:39 AM   #65
andymays
Veteran
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 9,908
http://www.bloodhorse.com/horse-raci...irt-main-track

Excerpt:

Stronach said that he will send some horses from his extensive stable, now headquartered in the East, to Santa Anita as a gesture of his commitment to the change.
andymays is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 08-19-2010, 11:40 AM   #66
andymays
Veteran
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 9,908
Quote:
Originally Posted by GMB@BP
So does this dirt make it economically feasible to race in Ca?

If not this will do nothing for the product other than what little racing will occur will be more legit. Its still gonna be 7.5 horses per race.
Right, this solves one small problem out of many.
andymays is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 08-19-2010, 12:13 PM   #67
The_Knight_Sky
Registered User
 
The_Knight_Sky's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 1,202
Quote:
Originally Posted by andymays
Right, this solves one small problem out of many.

Now it is up to the CHRB to upgrade and enforce the backstretch medications policies. You know, that policy which currently allows for major horses to make (gasp) 4 or 5 starts a year.

The same that finds a Greg's Gold or a Lava Man and other similar marquee horses coming back after extensive layups that is not the norm around the country. The talented horses are out there, but so is extreme brittleness.

Addressing medication and reducing California Fair dates helps bolster
the field sizes at the major tracks.

Yesterday's card from Ferndale had a mixed meet fare.
I waited for the 5th race to finally see a t-bred race.
Then got served up a depleted $2,500 claiming affair.

This is not what the rest of the country wants to see and wager on.
The_Knight_Sky is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 08-19-2010, 12:31 PM   #68
andymays
Veteran
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 9,908
http://chrb.ca.gov/

CHRB Meeting today August 19th!

Go to Webcasts . The meeting starts at 10:00 am pst.
andymays is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 08-19-2010, 01:51 PM   #69
DeanT
Registered User
 
DeanT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Toronto
Posts: 4,962
Nice to see the CHRB have an expert like Peterson on track surfaces testify, rather than what they do when they talk about takeout.
DeanT is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 08-19-2010, 01:53 PM   #70
v j stauffer
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 4,284
Quote:
Originally Posted by JeremyJet
How ironic. I have the same urge when I hear you calling a race.

Regards,

JeremyJet
v j stauffer is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 08-19-2010, 02:09 PM   #71
andymays
Veteran
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 9,908
These guys scare the hell out of me (CHRB meeting). They're like a bunch of indecisive hand wringers.
andymays is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 08-19-2010, 02:12 PM   #72
Charlie D
Registered User
 
Charlie D's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Gods County, United Kingdom
Posts: 3,533
Andy

Did i understand right the guy from Oak tree. He is for rip base up, make good and put Pro-Ride back down??
Charlie D is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 08-19-2010, 02:15 PM   #73
andymays
Veteran
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 9,908
Quote:
Originally Posted by Charlie D
Andy

Did i understand right the guy from Oak tree. He is for rip base up, make good and put Pro-Ride back down??
It was something to do with relaying the top half of the surface I think. I have no idea why the Oak Tree guy would have any input into messing with the surface. These guys are a confusing group of people. What a mess.
andymays is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 08-19-2010, 02:18 PM   #74
GMB@BP
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Dark Side of the Moon
Posts: 5,870
Quote:
Originally Posted by The_Knight_Sky
Now it is up to the CHRB to upgrade and enforce the backstretch medications policies. You know, that policy which currently allows for major horses to make (gasp) 4 or 5 starts a year.

The same that finds a Greg's Gold or a Lava Man and other similar marquee horses coming back after extensive layups that is not the norm around the country. The talented horses are out there, but so is extreme brittleness.

Addressing medication and reducing California Fair dates helps bolster
the field sizes at the major tracks.

Yesterday's card from Ferndale had a mixed meet fare.
I waited for the 5th race to finally see a t-bred race.
Then got served up a depleted $2,500 claiming affair.

This is not what the rest of the country wants to see and wager on.
medications? Seriously.

How does that mean anything to the cost to run and maintain a horse in the State of California?
GMB@BP is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 08-19-2010, 02:36 PM   #75
BlueShoe
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Anaheim,California
Posts: 4,675
Quote:
Originally Posted by The_Knight_Sky
Yesterday's card from Ferndale had a mixed meet fare.
I waited for the 5th race to finally see a t-bred race.
Then got served up a depleted $2,500 claiming affair.

This is not what the rest of the country wants to see and wager on.
Ferndale is Ferndale, and is a rather unique special place that many of us enjoy and look forward to. It should not be taken seriously, this is the place where shippers from obscure little county fair tracks in small western towns are major contenders. There are a couple of active Ferndale threads that help capture the mood of this little 1/2 mile track.
BlueShoe is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Reply





Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

» Advertisement
» Current Polls
Wh deserves to be the favorite? (last 4 figures)
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:15 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Copyright 1999 - 2023 -- PaceAdvantage.Com -- All Rights Reserved
We are a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program
designed to provide a means for us to earn fees by linking to Amazon.com and affiliated sites.