Horse Racing Forum - PaceAdvantage.Com - Horse Racing Message Board

Go Back   Horse Racing Forum - PaceAdvantage.Com - Horse Racing Message Board > Thoroughbred Horse Racing Discussion > General Racing Discussion


Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
Old 06-14-2018, 12:56 PM   #16
Andy Asaro
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2017
Posts: 5,800
Quote:
Originally Posted by dilanesp View Post
What belongs at the LA County Fair is cotton candy, a ferris wheel, a fun house, animal exhibitions, and impossible to win giant teddy bears.

Pomona got rid of racing because it is a money loser. And as much as I make fun of Los Al, at least it is 10 degrees colder there than in Pomona.
Corruption got rid of Horse Racing at Pomona. Los Al has no turf course and has been a complete failure. When H.P. closed down Liebau manipulated everyone into going to Los Al even though it was never a permanent solution. Pomona is being looked at again as we speak.

Head of L.A. County Fair Assn. quits after Times investigation

http://www.latimes.com/local/lanow/l...330-story.html

Excerpt:

Henwood's departure follows a Los Angeles Times investigation that found that he and other executives received lucrative pay and benefit packages despite several years of red ink at the association. The organization stages the annual fair and operates a number of year-round enterprises at the taxpayer-owned fairgrounds in Pomona.

In 2014, the most recent year for which figures are available, the association reported a loss of $3.44 million, federal tax returns show — its fifth straight year of negative results. During that period, compensation for Henwood and his top managers increased dramatically.
Andy Asaro is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 06-14-2018, 01:01 PM   #17
dilanesp
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 8,798
Quote:
Originally Posted by Andy Asaro View Post
Corruption got rid of Horse Racing at Pomona. Los Al has no turf course and has been a complete failure. When H.P. closed down Liebau manipulated everyone into going to Los Al even though it was never a permanent solution. Pomona is being looked at again as we speak.

Head of L.A. County Fair Assn. quits after Times investigation

http://www.latimes.com/local/lanow/l...330-story.html

Excerpt:

Henwood's departure follows a Los Angeles Times investigation that found that he and other executives received lucrative pay and benefit packages despite several years of red ink at the association. The organization stages the annual fair and operates a number of year-round enterprises at the taxpayer-owned fairgrounds in Pomona.

In 2014, the most recent year for which figures are available, the association reported a loss of $3.44 million, federal tax returns show — its fifth straight year of negative results. During that period, compensation for Henwood and his top managers increased dramatically.
Do you think Pomona was making a profit on racing greater than what they make on the concerts they hold there now? If your answer is "yes", how come a couple of other racing fairs have shut down in recent years?
dilanesp is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 06-14-2018, 01:04 PM   #18
Andy Asaro
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2017
Posts: 5,800
Quote:
Originally Posted by dilanesp View Post
Do you think Pomona was making a profit on racing greater than what they make on the concerts they hold there now? If your answer is "yes", how come a couple of other racing fairs have shut down in recent years?
All I can tell you is what I know from reading AND talking to people high up in the food chain. Do I think it will happen? No, I think California racing as we know it is done.
Andy Asaro is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 06-14-2018, 01:07 PM   #19
Andy Asaro
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2017
Posts: 5,800
Andy Asaro is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 06-14-2018, 01:21 PM   #20
CheckMark
 
CheckMark's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Fergus,ON
Posts: 3,709
Quote:
Originally Posted by Andy Asaro View Post
I love Golden Gate. I also loved Hollywood Park, but they shut it down. Hopefully they do not do this to Golden Gate.
__________________
Handicapping the world year round'
-Conley
CheckMark is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 06-14-2018, 01:34 PM   #21
Andy Asaro
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2017
Posts: 5,800
Quote:
Originally Posted by CheckMark View Post
I love Golden Gate. I also loved Hollywood Park, but they shut it down. Hopefully they do not do this to Golden Gate.
I doubt they will shut it down.
Andy Asaro is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 06-14-2018, 01:37 PM   #22
dilanesp
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 8,798
Quote:
Originally Posted by Andy Asaro View Post
All I can tell you is what I know from reading AND talking to people high up in the food chain. Do I think it will happen? No, I think California racing as we know it is done.
I think Fairplex was always a fantasy. The business model of the racing fairs- that horse racing is popular and brings people in who then spend money on the fair- has not worked for years. Stockton and Vallejo now use their racetracks for concerts at the fair, and so does Pomona. If horse racing at the fair were a moneymaker at the fair, none of those 3 would have ever given up their dates.

A lot of things were desperately thrown about by people who didn't want to confront the reality that California can only support one circuit. One of the ridiculous ideas- Los Al- got enacted, but it isn't going to last forever.

People hate Stronach, but he at least has been able to keep racing going. Might as well keep him happy rather than undertaking extravagant failures.
dilanesp is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 06-14-2018, 06:08 PM   #23
AlsoEligible
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2015
Posts: 234
Apparently Ritvo didn't show at the GGF meeting today, but not a lot of new information came out of it anyway. Next week's CHRB meeting is where all the sparks will really fly.

http://www.thoroughbreddailynews.com...33XnI.facebook

Quote:
Ritvo did not attend the June 14 meeting, which was hosted by Golden Gate’s General Manager David Duggan and P.J. Campo, the Vice President of Racing for The Stronach Group. They spoke with local owners and trainers about Golden Gate’s future, urging them to attend the CHRB meeting June 21 at the Alameda County Fairgrounds.

“At the meeting we simply reiterated our position with regard to the model that exists in California,” Duggan said. “We told the horsemen that we wish to change the model, that it is broken and has been broken and documented since 2010. That is the message we delivered to the horsemen; they took it reasonably well.”

But at least one horseman feels uneasy.

“I don’t want us to be forced into the middle,” said trainer Blaine Wright, who is based out of Golden Gate. “This is between two companies, and we as horsemen shouldn’t have to stand up for one or the other. I would love to see year-round racing at Golden Gate, because I believe in racing where you are training, so I’m for The Stronach Group and support them. But it puts the horsemen in a bad bind to tell us to go to the meeting next week and speak up about this.”

Dates for the Northern California circuit have already been a contentious subject as The Stronach Group continues to seek year-round racing at Golden Gate, which could come at the expense of the fair circuit. The long-standing summer tradition sees racing bounce between Pleasanton, Cal Expo, Santa Rosa, Ferndale, Los Alamitos, and Fresno, which Wright notes can be logistically difficult for trainers and their staff.

“The fair circuit is fun, but it’s problematic because you’re limited in the racing,” Wright said. “But the fairs do offer a stakes schedule that Golden Gate can’t compete with.”

The Stronach Group has contended they would like to race concurrently with the fair circuit, but questions remain over the California horse population’s ability to support simultaneous racing in the area.

“I’m sure that the CHRB meeting next week will be interesting,” Duggan said. “They know what our stance is.”
AlsoEligible is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 06-14-2018, 06:29 PM   #24
Fager Fan
Veteran
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 5,222
Quote:
Originally Posted by Andy Asaro View Post
I'm all for boycotts on important issues and such, but Todd is just like all the other handicappers who don't get that they are *only* the customer. The customer in racing has the very same amount of *say* in racing as the customer of any other service or product has over that company. The *say* is either buying the service or product or not, writing complaints or suggestions or not.

As someone who's made my living in the shampoo industry 30yrs, I've seen innumerable variations of disputes like this. I certainly get complexities. However, Industry needs to remember who's money they're dividing up; shampoo users. Yet,that group never has a say.

So what does Shrupp think? That people with hair should have seats on the Proctor & Gamble board? Maybe they get together and vote one of themselves in as the executive vice president of product and marketing?

Exactly what *say* does Shrupp think the customers of any product should have, and how should that *say* be implemented?

Last edited by Fager Fan; 06-14-2018 at 06:31 PM.
Fager Fan is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 06-14-2018, 06:35 PM   #25
Andy Asaro
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2017
Posts: 5,800
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fager Fan View Post
I'm all for boycotts on important issues and such, but Todd is just like all the other handicappers who don't get that they are *only* the customer. The customer in racing has the very same amount of *say* in racing as the customer of any other service or product has over that company. The *say* is either buying the service or product or not, writing complaints or suggestions or not.

As someone who's made my living in the shampoo industry 30yrs, I've seen innumerable variations of disputes like this. I certainly get complexities. However, Industry needs to remember who's money they're dividing up; shampoo users. Yet,that group never has a say.

So what does Shrupp think? That people with hair should have seats on the Proctor & Gamble board? Maybe they get together and vote one of themselves in as the executive vice president of product and marketing?

Exactly what *say* does Shrupp think the customers of any product should have, and how should that *say* be implemented?
Shrupp speaks out about low takeout and other issues when he can. He helped expose the photo finish debacle at Del Mar last year. Don't know anyone on air who does that at least once in a while. I appreciate it.
Andy Asaro is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 06-14-2018, 10:59 PM   #26
alhattab
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Jersey Shore
Posts: 1,189
Quote:
Originally Posted by AlsoEligible View Post
Apparently Ritvo didn't show at the GGF meeting today, but not a lot of new information came out of it anyway. Next week's CHRB meeting is where all the sparks will really fly.

http://www.thoroughbreddailynews.com...33XnI.facebook
I'm not very close to this story but it sounds a bit like Gulfstream/Calder, Part Deaux.
alhattab is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 06-15-2018, 01:11 PM   #27
Prioress Ply
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2017
Posts: 83
“I don’t want us to be forced into the middle,” said trainer Blaine Wright, who is based out of Golden Gate. “This is between two companies, and we as horsemen shouldn’t have to stand up for one or the other. I would love to see year-round racing at Golden Gate, because I believe in racing where you are training, so I’m for The Stronach Group and support them. But it puts the horsemen in a bad bind to tell us to go to the meeting next week and speak up about this.”


I'll bet he wants to see year round racing of 5 and 6 horse fields so the club can continue.

Look at the cars these clowns roll up to the track in the morning in. Real eye opener.
Prioress Ply is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 06-15-2018, 01:52 PM   #28
dilanesp
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 8,798
Quote:
Originally Posted by Prioress Ply View Post
“I don’t want us to be forced into the middle,” said trainer Blaine Wright, who is based out of Golden Gate. “This is between two companies, and we as horsemen shouldn’t have to stand up for one or the other. I would love to see year-round racing at Golden Gate, because I believe in racing where you are training, so I’m for The Stronach Group and support them. But it puts the horsemen in a bad bind to tell us to go to the meeting next week and speak up about this.”


I'll bet he wants to see year round racing of 5 and 6 horse fields so the club can continue.

Look at the cars these clowns roll up to the track in the morning in. Real eye opener.
As I said upthread, I am not a fan of separate year round Northern and Southern circuits. But if Wright wants that, giving Stronach what he wants is his best hope for it.
dilanesp is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 06-15-2018, 07:56 PM   #29
Valuist
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: NE Ohio
Posts: 16,487
There's no reason why both circuits can't exist. Many of the Bay area horses aren't good enough to compete down south. The Bay area is one of the biggest metro areas in the country. They SHOULD be able to support year round racing. Another example of synthetic racing killing the product. Put real dirt in at GGF and they probably thrive. Absolutely no reason for an all-weather surface in California.
Valuist is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 06-15-2018, 08:52 PM   #30
dilanesp
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 8,798
Quote:
Originally Posted by Valuist View Post
There's no reason why both circuits can't exist. Many of the Bay area horses aren't good enough to compete down south. The Bay area is one of the biggest metro areas in the country. They SHOULD be able to support year round racing. Another example of synthetic racing killing the product. Put real dirt in at GGF and they probably thrive. Absolutely no reason for an all-weather surface in California.
1. BM, the dirt track up there, didn't even manage to last as long as GGF. Tapeta has probably helped save the NCal circuit.

2. The main problem is a shortage of horses, resulting in small unbettable fields. The size of the Bay area market has nothing to do with that.

3. SA now has MCL16000 and CLM6250 races,and they draw 6 horse fields. We are ready to absorb GGF's cheaper horses.
dilanesp is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Reply




Thread Tools
Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

» Advertisement
» Current Polls
Wh deserves to be the favorite? (last 4 figures)
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:38 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Copyright 1999 - 2023 -- PaceAdvantage.Com -- All Rights Reserved
We are a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program
designed to provide a means for us to earn fees by linking to Amazon.com and affiliated sites.