Vote harvesting is real

[JustRalph]

https://www.statesman.com/news/20200...CkKLdDUphdQsIQ

[ElKabong]

Didn't see this earlier, I posted it on another thread concerning voter fraud

THIS NEVER HAPPENS, RIGHT, MOSTIE?

[ElKabong]

What's funny is, one of the soon to be jailbirds doesn't even live in Gregg county. She lives in neighboring Marshall (Harrison county). This is FAR more widespread than people think

[boxcar]

Originally Posted by ElKabong

Didn't see this earlier, I posted it on another thread concerning voter fraud

THIS NEVER HAPPENS, RIGHT, MOSTIE?

Common sense should tell us that politics with very many people is a hot button issue that will inflame their passions, as no other can, save for religion. Therefore, many people are driven to get the outcome of an election they want, even if that involves breaking the law. This is precisely why protecting and securing the integrity of elections is of paramount importance.

[Marshall Bennett]

And the leftist press insist Trump insures a peaceful transition.
And guess who will toss peace out the window when there isn't a transition?
The question posed to Trump at the press conference was loaded and a set-up.
If it looks and smells like an asshole...well you know, the reporter was just that by asking such a dumb question.

[hcap]

Christopher Wray: FBI has not seen evidence of national voter fraud effort by mail
https://www.axios.com/mail-in-voting....html?src=ilaw
.
.FBI Director Christopher Wray responded to a question on the security of mail-in voting to the Senate Homeland Security Committee on Thursday by saying that the agency has "not seen, historically, any kind of coordinated national voter fraud effort in a major election, whether it's by mail or otherwise."

FBI Director Christopher A. Wray told the Senate Homeland Security Committee on Sept. 24 that foreign mail-in ballot interference “would be a major challenge."

YouTube (Short URL)

[boxcar]

Originally Posted by hcap

Christopher Wray: FBI has not seen evidence of national voter fraud effort by mail
https://www.axios.com/mail-in-voting....html?src=ilaw
.
.FBI Director Christopher Wray responded to a question on the security of mail-in voting to the Senate Homeland Security Committee on Thursday by saying that the agency has "not seen, historically, any kind of coordinated national voter fraud effort in a major election, whether it's by mail or otherwise."

FBI Director Christopher A. Wray told the Senate Homeland Security Committee on Sept. 24 that foreign mail-in ballot interference “would be a major challenge."

https://youtu.be/0irbM9ZIv5E

Pay attention, Empty Suit: Wray didn't say that the FBI hasn't seen any voter fraud effort on a state level. Common sense, should tell you () voter fraud does not have to take place on a coordinated national level since so many states are solidly "blue". Additionally, there are states that are solidly "red"; therefore, it's only the "purple" (swing) states that would be most susceptible to fraud attempts, and any fraud within a state is a state-county issue, not a federal one. Of course, this year with the impending avalanche of mail-in-votes, any fraud through the U.S. mail would involve federal investigation and prosecution

In other words: Wray didn't say very much at all.

[hcap]

Originally Posted by boxcar

Pay attention, Empty Suit: Wray didn't say that the FBI hasn't seen any voter fraud effort on a state level. Common sense, should tell you () voter fraud does not have to take place on a coordinated national level since so many states are solidly "blue". Additionally, there are states that are solidly "red"; therefore, it's only the "purple" (swing) states that would be most susceptible to fraud attempts, and any fraud within a state is a state-county issue, not a federal one. Of course, this year with the impending avalanche of mail-in-votes, any fraud through the U.S. mail would involve federal investigation and prosecution

In other words: Wray didn't say very much at all.

Wray noted that the agency had seen local election fraud "from time to time" and that the agency takes election threats seriously, which he said includes potential threats through mailed ballots.

So you think since he only stated "the agency had seen local election fraud "from time to time", the FBI has not monitored that carefully, and for some reason was minimizing widespread state voter fraud?

Wouldn't it be more likely since the inquiry before congress was about "voter fraud", he would have admitted the "vast conspiracy" you and your idiot-in-chief are bitching about?

Whether federal or state?

I know Mr Wray will be fired soon enough for contradicting Trump's scare tactics.

What is that? 3 FBI directors, 3 security advisors, and a DNI. Not counting the 4 or so inspector generals. All agents of the deep state out to make him look like more of the inept blithering idiot than he is naturally.


.

[ElKabong]

Originally Posted by hcap

Wray noted that the agency had seen local election fraud "from time to time" and that the agency takes election threats seriously, which he said includes potential threats through mailed ballots.

So you think since he only stated "the agency had seen local election fraud "from time to time", the FBI has not monitored that carefully, and for some reason was minimizing widespread state voter fraud?

Wouldn't it be more likely since the inquiry before congress was about "voter fraud", he would have admitted the "vast conspiracy" you and your idiot-in-chief are bitching about?

Whether federal or state?

I know Mr Wray will be fired soon enough for contradicting Trump's scare tactics.

What is that? 3 FBI directors, 3 security advisors, and a DNI. Not counting the 4 or so inspector generals. All agents of the deep state out to make him look like more of the inept blithering idiot than he is naturally.


.

Is this the same FBI as below? If so, we all know what the objective was. Maybe still is

https://thefederalist.com/2020/09/25...-was-targeted/

[hcap]

Originally Posted by ElKabong

Is this the same FBI as below? If so, we all know what the objective was. Maybe still is

https://thefederalist.com/2020/09/25...-was-targeted/

Don't feel like going down another convoluted conspiracy theory rabbit hole.

The subject is your moron bitching about "unsolicited" mail in voting.

[ElKabong]

Originally Posted by hcap

Don't feel like going down another convoluted conspiracy theory rabbit hole.

The subject is your moron bitching about "unsolicited" mail in voting.

Don't blame ya, cupcake. Looks like dems were in bed w/ the Russians Russians Russians all along

Ballot harvesting. Voter fraud. Trays of ballots in a ditch out of a USPS truck. It never happens, right? In one day...

[boxcar]

Originally Posted by hcap

Wray noted that the agency had seen local election fraud "from time to time" and that the agency takes election threats seriously, which he said includes potential threats through mailed ballots.

So you think since he only stated "the agency had seen local election fraud "from time to time", the FBI has not monitored that carefully, and for some reason was minimizing widespread state voter fraud?

Wouldn't it be more likely since the inquiry before congress was about "voter fraud", he would have admitted the "vast conspiracy" you and your idiot-in-chief are bitching about?

Whether federal or state?

I know Mr Wray will be fired soon enough for contradicting Trump's scare tactics.

What is that? 3 FBI directors, 3 security advisors, and a DNI. Not counting the 4 or so inspector generals. All agents of the deep state out to make him look like more of the inept blithering idiot than he is naturally.


.

You're misrepresenting me. Wray really didn't address fraud cases on the state level. Wray talked about cases coordinated on the "national" level, remember?

Cases on state level are pretty much out of federal jurisdiction.

[hcap]

Originally Posted by boxcar

You're misrepresenting me. Wray really didn't address fraud cases on the state level. Wray talked about cases coordinated on the "national" level, remember?

Cases on state level are pretty much out of federal jurisdiction.

You are blind, deaf and extremely dumb.

No cases on the state level are handled by the FBI all the time. And he specifically said "the agency had seen local election fraud "from time to time"

"Time to time" is not massive fraud as you and your moron have claimed.

[hcap]

Originally Posted by ElKabong

Don't blame ya, cupcake. Looks like dems were in bed w/ the Russians Russians Russians all along

Ballot harvesting. Voter fraud. Trays of ballots in a ditch out of a USPS truck. It never happens, right? In one day...

Bullshit hayseed.

And btw, there have been many studies and investigations showing the FBI was justified in investigating your moon. From Mueller, to the Repug Senate Intel committee, and of course the Horowitz IG report you Trumpites kept telling us when it came out the "deep state" would be dead and done

IG Report: FBI Was Justified in Opening Russia Probe
https://www.voanews.com/usa/ig-repor...g-russia-probe

And now the Durham report is gonna say the very same thing, or Hitler's executioner Barr, instead of threatening to publish it, would have released it already.

And then there is idiot RONJON.....

Besieged on all sides, Ron Johnson says his probe 'would certainly' help Trump win reelection
https://www.voanews.com/usa/ig-repor...g-russia-probe

[hcap]

GOP election lawyer says no evidence to support Trump's claim about mail-in voting fraud
https://www.cnn.com/2020/09/09/polit...ims/index.html

(CNN)Benjamin Ginsberg, a top Republican election lawyer who has represented four Republican presidential candidates, slammed President Donald Trump's claims of widespread voter fraud in a new op-ed saying it lacks evidence and is "unsustainable."

Ginsberg, a longtime lawyer who recently retired from the practice and co-chaired the 2013 Presidential Commission on Election Administration, wrote in The Washington Post on Tuesday that Trump's recent comments about widespread fraud in mail-in voting, which risk undermining confidence in the election, and urging voters to cast their ballots twice are "doubly wrong."