Horse Racing Forum - PaceAdvantage.Com - Horse Racing Message Board

Go Back   Horse Racing Forum - PaceAdvantage.Com - Horse Racing Message Board > Off Topic > Off Topic - General


Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
Old 06-24-2021, 12:13 PM   #1
boxcar
Registered User
 
boxcar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 46,883
The FDA is as Twisted, Crooked and Duplicitous as Fauci is!

Some COVID shots may be linked to rare heart problems in teens: CDC

The FDA on Wednesday said it plans to add a warning to Pfizer and Moderna vaccines after a CDC advisory panel said data suggests a "likely association" between the vaccines and rare cases of heart inflammation in adolescents and young adults. Despite the warning, doctors and researchers say they still strongly recommend that all Americans 12 and older get vaccinated, noting that the heart problems are uncommon and in most cases very mild. (emphaiss mine)

https://www.yahoo.com/news/covid-sho...231300876.html

Of course! What else would we expect the FDA to say? Meanwhile, there are virtually zero risks associated with Ivermectin.
__________________
Consistent profits can only be made on the basis of analysis that is far from obvious to the majority. - anonymous guru
boxcar is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 06-24-2021, 02:51 PM   #2
PaceAdvantage
PA Steward
 
PaceAdvantage's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Del Boca Vista
Posts: 88,542
I think fetuses in the womb should be injected with the COVID vaccine.

Can't be too careful.
__________________
@paceadvantage | Support the site and become a today!
PaceAdvantage is online now   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 06-24-2021, 03:43 PM   #3
mostpost
Registered User
 
mostpost's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: North Riverside, Il.
Posts: 16,096
Quote:
Originally Posted by boxcar View Post
Some COVID shots may be linked to rare heart problems in teens: CDC

The FDA on Wednesday said it plans to add a warning to Pfizer and Moderna vaccines after a CDC advisory panel said data suggests a "likely association" between the vaccines and rare cases of heart inflammation in adolescents and young adults. Despite the warning, doctors and researchers say they still strongly recommend that all Americans 12 and older get vaccinated, noting that the heart problems are uncommon and in most cases very mild. (emphaiss mine)

https://www.yahoo.com/news/covid-sho...231300876.html

Of course! What else would we expect the FDA to say? Meanwhile, there are virtually zero risks associated with Ivermectin.
Look up the definition of the word rare. Look up the definition of the word uncommon. Look up the definition of very mild.

As for Invermectin, there a great deal of risks associated with the dosages needed to maybe treat Covid-I emphasize the word maybe. Because there is no scientific proof that it’s effective. Gee, there’s that word science again.


https://www.fda.gov/consumers/consum...event-covid-19
__________________
"When you come at the King, You'd best not miss." Omar Little
mostpost is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 06-24-2021, 03:50 PM   #4
woodtoo
Registered User
 
woodtoo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: donkeys ride from ASD
Posts: 13,002
Vaers!!!!.jpg
Im hearing lots of chatter about pilots dying and airlines having shortages but not saying why.
If you have been jabbed so you can fly you may be grounded.
Blood clots being the reason.
__________________
'complicated business folks, complicated business.'
woodtoo is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 06-24-2021, 03:57 PM   #5
Jeff P
Registered User
 
Jeff P's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: JCapper Platinum: Kind of like Deep Blue... but for horses.
Posts: 5,287
American Journal of Therapeutics
Ivermectin for Prevention and Treatment of COVID-19 Infection:

https://journals.lww.com/americanthe..._of.98040.aspx

Quote:
Data sources:

We searched bibliographic databases up to April 25, 2021. Two review authors sifted for studies, extracted data, and assessed risk of bias. Meta-analyses were conducted and certainty of the evidence was assessed using the GRADE approach and additionally in trial sequential analyses for mortality. Twenty-four randomized controlled trials involving 3406 participants met review inclusion.

Therapeutic Advances:

Meta-analysis of 15 trials found that ivermectin reduced risk of death compared with no ivermectin (average risk ratio 0.38, 95% confidence interval 0.19–0.73; n = 2438; I2 = 49%; moderate-certainty evidence). This result was confirmed in a trial sequential analysis using the same DerSimonian–Laird method that underpinned the unadjusted analysis. This was also robust against a trial sequential analysis using the Biggerstaff–Tweedie method. Low-certainty evidence found that ivermectin prophylaxis reduced COVID-19 infection by an average 86% (95% confidence interval 79%–91%). Secondary outcomes provided less certain evidence. Low-certainty evidence suggested that there may be no benefit with ivermectin for “need for mechanical ventilation,” whereas effect estimates for “improvement” and “deterioration” clearly favored ivermectin use. Severe adverse events were rare among treatment trials and evidence of no difference was assessed as low certainty. Evidence on other secondary outcomes was very low certainty.

Conclusions:

Moderate-certainty evidence finds that large reductions in COVID-19 deaths are possible using ivermectin. Using ivermectin early in the clinical course may reduce numbers progressing to severe disease. The apparent safety and low cost suggest that ivermectin is likely to have a significant impact on the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic globally.

-jp

.
__________________
Team JCapper: 2011 PAIHL Regular Season ROI Leader after 15 weeks
www.JCapper.com
Jeff P is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 06-24-2021, 04:05 PM   #6
woodtoo
Registered User
 
woodtoo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: donkeys ride from ASD
Posts: 13,002
Quote:
Originally Posted by mostpost View Post
Look up the definition of the word rare. Look up the definition of the word uncommon. Look up the definition of very mild.

As for Invermectin, there a great deal of risks associated with the dosages needed to maybe treat Covid-I emphasize the word maybe. Because there is no scientific proof that it’s effective. Gee, there’s that word science again.


https://www.fda.gov/consumers/consum...event-covid-19
Bull!!! Ivermectin is safe tested and works but dont take my word as studies have shown.
__________________
'complicated business folks, complicated business.'
woodtoo is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 06-24-2021, 07:05 PM   #7
boxcar
Registered User
 
boxcar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 46,883
Quote:
Originally Posted by mostpost View Post
Look up the definition of the word rare. Look up the definition of the word uncommon. Look up the definition of very mild.

As for Invermectin, there a great deal of risks associated with the dosages needed to maybe treat Covid-I emphasize the word maybe. Because there is no scientific proof that it’s effective. Gee, there’s that word science again.


https://www.fda.gov/consumers/consum...event-covid-19
Look up the definition of "spin". Why would any thinking person believe the medical establishment, which includes the FDA, would not mitigate this negative report as much as posssible?

As for ivermectin, there's plenty of scientific proof that is effective and safe! You're just blind to what is out there.
__________________
Consistent profits can only be made on the basis of analysis that is far from obvious to the majority. - anonymous guru

Last edited by boxcar; 06-24-2021 at 07:07 PM.
boxcar is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 06-24-2021, 08:23 PM   #8
mostpost
Registered User
 
mostpost's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: North Riverside, Il.
Posts: 16,096
Quote:
Originally Posted by woodtoo View Post
Bull!!! Ivermectin is safe tested and works but dont take my word as studies have shown.
It works on parasites at specific levels. It’s safe at those levels for those problems. It is not an anti viral.
__________________
"When you come at the King, You'd best not miss." Omar Little
mostpost is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 06-24-2021, 08:55 PM   #9
xtb
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Western NY
Posts: 5,336
Quote:
Originally Posted by mostpost View Post
It works on parasites at specific levels. It’s safe at those levels for those problems. It is not an anti viral.
No one is claiming that ivermectin is an anti viral drug, Cliffy. Many drugs have multiple functions. Inflammation and clotting in the lungs is how the chinavirus kills humans. There is significant evidence that ivermectin and some other treatments that aren't supposed to be mentioned, are effective in treating these symptoms. If the FDA admits that these treatments are effective, the emergency authorization for the vaccines would have to be revoked and the vaccine house of cards would collapse, preventing a lot of people from getting even richer.
xtb is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 06-24-2021, 09:31 PM   #10
TJDave
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 10,989
Quote:
Originally Posted by PaceAdvantage View Post
I think fetuses in the womb should be injected with the COVID vaccine.
Me too.

…and extra credit for not calling them babies.
__________________
All I needed in life I learned from Gary Larson.
TJDave is online now   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 06-24-2021, 09:48 PM   #11
46zilzal
velocitician
 
46zilzal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 26,287
Like ANY drug every used in Medicine,. there will be some totally expected effects.

CLASSIC was diethylstilbestrol where side effects ONLY showed upin female offspring of patents some 35 years after the fact
__________________
"If this world is all about winners, what's for the losers?" Jr. Bonner: "Well somebody's got to hold the horses Ace."

Last edited by 46zilzal; 06-24-2021 at 09:49 PM.
46zilzal is online now   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 06-24-2021, 11:53 PM   #12
davew
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 22,632
I would not be surprised if in 20 years it is determined that mRNA vaccinations to prepuberty children end up with lower fertility and increased birth defects.
davew is online now   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 06-25-2021, 12:16 PM   #13
Elkchester Road
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: Near Lexington, KY
Posts: 3,246
Quote:
Originally Posted by davew View Post
I would not be surprised if in 20 years it is determined that mRNA vaccinations to prepuberty children end up with lower fertility and increased birth defects.
Exactly, davew. Look at who has been connected at the Hip to these Vaccines since Day 1. Many who believe with every Fiber of their Being that this Planet is overpopulated.
__________________
Just when you least expect it...just what you least expect-The Pet Shop Boys.
Elkchester Road is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 06-25-2021, 01:18 PM   #14
46zilzal
velocitician
 
46zilzal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 26,287
Quote:
Originally Posted by davew View Post
I would not be surprised if in 20 years it is determined that mRNA vaccinations to prepuberty children end up with lower fertility and increased birth defects.
ZERO evidence
__________________
"If this world is all about winners, what's for the losers?" Jr. Bonner: "Well somebody's got to hold the horses Ace."
46zilzal is online now   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 06-25-2021, 01:44 PM   #15
Elkchester Road
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: Near Lexington, KY
Posts: 3,246
Quote:
Originally Posted by 46zilzal View Post
ZERO evidence
Long time, no see, Speedy.

davew is forecasting...not litigating a case in Court.

President Biden: "ZERO evidence'' in almost 50 years of Service as a Leader...yet you have absolutely no problem with him...no matter how disastrous his Policies have been, so far.

Quit while you're behind.
__________________
Just when you least expect it...just what you least expect-The Pet Shop Boys.
Elkchester Road is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Reply





Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

» Advertisement
» Current Polls
Wh deserves to be the favorite? (last 4 figures)
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:02 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Copyright 1999 - 2023 -- PaceAdvantage.Com -- All Rights Reserved
We are a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program
designed to provide a means for us to earn fees by linking to Amazon.com and affiliated sites.