Election Fraud Lies, Trump, and his supporters

[davew]

no he is not, just pointing out when they 'interpret' laws and the constitution in ways that have never been done before ... that must be because they are progressive

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yu-7L5W6Rew&t=118s

[Tom]

My point, he is clueless!

I think he hears voices in his head.
It's not that he disagrees with me, he is disagreeing with REALITY.
Trump never threatened violence.
Roe v Wade democraps actually showed up on justices' property.

You can't fix stupid.

[Half Smoke]

Originally Posted by davew

no he is not, just pointing out when they 'interpret' laws and the constitution in ways that have never been done before ... that must be because they are progressive

wrong - has nothing to do with being progressive

the link is from the Administrative Office of the U.S. Courts

quote -

"Free Speech does not include the right :

to incite imminent lawless action"

among other things

believe it or don't believe it -

I don't really care

I never stated that Trump incited violence - but he's come close

His supporters have - that's why Judges have been threatened

Calling me names won't intimidate me

not even a chance



https://www.uscourts.gov/about-feder...rces/what-does


.

[davew]

What has been said, tweeted, X'd or truth social'd to incite imminent lawless action? or has a progressive decided that?

[Half Smoke]

Originally Posted by davew

What has been said, tweeted, X'd or truth social'd to incite imminent lawless action? or has a progressive decided that?

I'm not hardly going to list all of them

see my post on this thread from 12:09 p.m. and the link there

the claim is coming from REPUBLICAN Judges

not that it will influence you at all

anything that challenges your point of view you can easily dismiss as being worthless "Progressive" nonsense

Carry on -


.

[Tom]

So YOU can't cite even one example where he encouraged violence.


Right.

[Half Smoke]

Originally Posted by Tom

So YOU can't cite even one example where he encouraged violence.
Right.

in my post at 2:46 in this thread I wrote:

"I never stated that Trump incited violence - but he's come close"

who's kidding who - everybody knows this


the link below takes a different point of view - that he has incited violence

.

https://www.axios.com/2022/05/02/tru...nce-presidency





.

[Tom]

Originally Posted by Half Smoke

https://www.axios.com/2022/05/02/tru...nce-presidency.

[davew]

Originally Posted by Half Smoke

https://www.axios.com/2022/05/02/tru...nce-presidency





.

So using law enforcement and military to protect federal property and officials from mobs burning and attacking people is inciting violence?

Did he tell that capital police officer to shoot Ashli Babbitt?

[Half Smoke]

Originally Posted by davew

So using law enforcement and military to protect federal property and officials from mobs burning and attacking people is inciting violence?

Did he tell that capital police officer to shoot Ashli Babbitt?

sorry man - I'm done with this thread

I'll be back on another one

or maybe not

you guys just instantly dismiss as BS or Progressive anything you disagree with

on 2nd thought this Forum is not really worth my time

I'm sure many will be happy to see me go


but I will be politically active in other arenas - for sure

.

[Tom]

Of course you're done here.
You can't valid the very premise of it and you got caught lying,
You Axios article was fodder for simpletons. Not a single call for violence in it, Just leftist nonsense.

But thanks for the laugh.

Call to violence against judges.....

[PaceAdvantage]

The funniest thing about this thread is that he used "Republican Judges," whatever that means, and thought it might mean something to someone.

That's the problem with leftists. They think everyone thinks like them...meaning...PARTY BEFORE EVERYTHING ELSE.

They haven't woken up to the fact that there are now three parties in this country.

Democrats & Republicans (both are pretty much the same these days)...and the third party...Regular Americans.

[thaskalos]

Originally Posted by PaceAdvantage

The funniest thing about this thread is that he used "Republican Judges," whatever that means, and thought it might mean something to someone.

That's the problem with leftists. They think everyone thinks like them...meaning...PARTY BEFORE EVERYTHING ELSE.

They haven't woken up to the fact that there are now three parties in this country.

Democrats & Republicans (both are pretty much the same these days)...and the third party...Regular Americans.

Who are the "Regular Americans"? The MAGAs?

[PaceAdvantage]

Originally Posted by thaskalos

Who are the "Regular Americans"? The MAGAs?

Regular Americans are those who don't think like Democrats or Republicans

[fast4522]

Regular Americans are leading the charge inside the Republican Party that makes you feel the Republican Party has left you when in fact your thoughts of inclusion feeling left out. Democrats have moved so far left of center have them feeling equally abandoned. Third party dreams are merely a fallacy as middle of the road Democrats flip party's because of self preservation being crushed by Biden's policy's that hurt the middle middle and lower middle class and the poor the most. There is No third party to run to, Rockefeller Republicans will continue to receive hind tit inside the party and be run out of office for being the RINO worthless members in the congress. Perspective is all that is left and the choice is limited to what currently is and what it may not be to ones thinking. This is civil war that is not with guns but economic pressure.