 |
|
10-09-2018, 09:32 AM
|
#556
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 30,398
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by davew
hcap, that kid will be dead in 50 years because he could not adapt to the 2 degree increase average world temperature.
|
A bit later than 50. With a hell of a lot of discomfort before dying.
That's the point.
Last edited by hcap; 10-09-2018 at 09:35 AM.
|
|
|
|
10-09-2018, 12:01 PM
|
#557
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Denver
Posts: 4,163
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tom
Can we sue?
Class action?
|
Wouldn't it be better to sue for classless action?
|
|
|
|
|
10-09-2018, 01:00 PM
|
#558
|
|
Quintessential guru
Join Date: Mar 2001
Posts: 11,254
|
Climate changes it is the height of arrogance to think man is the major impact for change. The waters are warming, which in turn warms the air, due to increased underwater volcanic activity and not mammal flatulence. However, playing on man's arrogance allows other men to make money off the global warming environmental threat.
The real man made threat to the environment is being ignored, because it would cost these so-called environmental leaders and very large businesses money, real losses of revenue. The measurable threat to the environment is excessive pharmaceutical use. People are consuming an immense amount of pharmaceuticals and discharging (urinating) these harmful chemicals into the the waterways. The discharge of into the waterways is measurably changing the environment and this change is directly related to human activity.
|
|
|
|
|
10-09-2018, 11:30 PM
|
#559
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 22,655
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Show Me the Wire
Climate changes it is the height of arrogance to think man is the major impact for change. The waters are warming, which in turn warms the air, due to increased underwater volcanic activity and not mammal flatulence. However, playing on man's arrogance allows other men to make money off the global warming environmental threat.
The real man made threat to the environment is being ignored, because it would cost these so-called environmental leaders and very large businesses money, real losses of revenue. The measurable threat to the environment is excessive pharmaceutical use. People are consuming an immense amount of pharmaceuticals and discharging (urinating) these harmful chemicals into the the waterways. The discharge of into the waterways is measurably changing the environment and this change is directly related to human activity.
|
yes, but what effect does pharmaceuticals have on the 'climate disruption' seen around the world since Al Gore pointed it out?
|
|
|
|
10-10-2018, 03:30 AM
|
#560
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 30,398
|
|
|
|
|
|
10-10-2018, 03:40 AM
|
#561
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 30,398
|
|
|
|
|
|
10-10-2018, 03:52 AM
|
#562
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 30,398
|
Trump called climate change a “hoax” several times.
Meanwhile, the IPCC released the report, “Special Report on Global Warming of 1.5ºC,” on Monday, outlining the urgent need for governments to act, quickly, to avoid worldwide catastrophe as a result of global warming. The report was authored and edited by dozens of climate scientists from around the world.
“With more than 6,000 scientific references cited and the dedicated contribution of thousands of expert and government reviewers worldwide, this important report testifies to the breadth and policy relevance of the IPCC,” IPCC Chair Hoesung
Again, anti-science Chumpy: " Donald Trump acknowledged receiving an alarming report on climate change from the United Nations’ Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change Tuesday, saying “I want to look at who drew it.”
No wonder he has you gents as slaves
|
|
|
|
|
10-10-2018, 06:36 AM
|
#563
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: May 2004
Location: New Hampshire
Posts: 14,487
|
|
|
|
|
|
10-10-2018, 09:56 AM
|
#564
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 22,655
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by hcap
|
You are 100% certain rather than there is significance at 95% confidence interval.
|
|
|
|
|
10-10-2018, 10:00 AM
|
#565
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 30,398
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by davew
You are 100% certain rather than there is significance at 95% confidence interval.
|
The scientific consensus of the world's climatologists stands at 97%.
I don't follow the anti-scientific consensus of the on this board.
|
|
|
|
|
10-10-2018, 10:04 AM
|
#566
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 30,398
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by fast4522
|
Got a reference to who and what this person is?
|
|
|
|
|
10-10-2018, 10:28 AM
|
#567
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 30,398
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by fast4522
|
Whomever your expert is, he is no match for Neil deGrasse Tyson explaining your and this boards ridiculous anti-science bias and ignorance.
|
|
|
|
|
10-10-2018, 10:29 AM
|
#568
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 30,398
|
|
|
|
|
|
10-10-2018, 10:32 AM
|
#569
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 30,398
|
More Tyson. You Trumpeteers should shut up and pay attention
Last edited by hcap; 10-10-2018 at 10:35 AM.
|
|
|
|
|
10-10-2018, 10:39 AM
|
#570
|
|
The Voice of Reason!
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Canandaigua, New york
Posts: 112,887
|
Going for the record?
5 in a row.
I'm impressed.
__________________
Who does the Racing Form Detective like in this one?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|
