The article toes a line of it's objective and the underlying bias of content/ author.
It's an interesting article that could almost be considered actual journalism (questioning the need for all this tracking), but predictably it wonders into vilifying the protestors and even ridiculously naming one of them using the data collecting by the very means it's supposed to be rejecting.
"Journalists" can't get out of their own way these days. This is a great concept that simply can't break through the bias lens of the media.
@
