Yep….take that vax

[Inner Dirt]

Originally Posted by PaceAdvantage

People really didn't have any idea Reagan was suffering from the early stages of Alzheimer's at the end of his second term, until it was revealed well after he had left office.

Now, compare this to Joe Biden...

If you do some Googling and watch Reagan videos that claim he was in bad shape, Reagan on his worst day looks better than Biden now. I just watched a Reagan video at 480P easily, wohoo, I believe with a cell internet change over and a fixed mouse problem I have now passed 1995 DSL and am at 1999 cable standards.



Reagan didn't have the cognitive fluctuations Biden does, or look like he just took a big hit of coke one minute, and took a handful of downers the next. Eyes are a dead giveaway something is off. Ever notice none of the Biden homers mention his eyes, when they look glued open?

[xtb]

Originally Posted by azeri98

What Reagan said, did he consider himself a problem. If he did dementia had probably already set in

Since he said it at his first inauguration speech, I would say no. Many must have agreed since he won 49 states on his way to his second term.

How is your fascist leader doing? Do you consider him a problem?

[classhandicapper]

I may need to do a regression analysis just to figure out the probability that the drug companies/FDA are corrupt, incompetent, or evil. They are releasing a "new" vaccine for a variant that's almost gone.

Peter A. McCullough, MD, MPH™
@P_McCulloughMD
XBB.1.5 is nearly gone 3.1% of strains.
@pfizer
@moderna_tx
chasing extinct variants. Products are not safer and completely out of date when they hit the market. New Eris syndrome very mild. Hospitalization data not valid unless adjudicated for C19 pneumonia.

[Jeff P]

Novak Djokovic in Feb 2022 after not being allowed to play (he was actually deported on the eve before the opening rounds) in the Australian Open:

Twitter

Last week after winning the US Open:

Twitter

And of course the Moderna Shot of the Day:

Twitter

Imo, much respect for standing firm on his personal beliefs.



-jp
.

__________________
Team JCapper: 2011 PAIHL Regular Season ROI Leader after 15 weeks
www.JCapper.com

---

Last edited by Jeff P; 09-15-2023 at 08:21 PM.

[PaceAdvantage]

The Moderna Shot of the Day...wow...we're literally living in a parody of our former real world, right?

[classhandicapper]

Imo, much respect for standing firm on his personal beliefs.

Yep.

They weren’t just attacking him personally, they were impacting his career and personal goals as a tennis player. And they were doing that despite clear cut evidence the vaccine was not preventing infection or more importantly transmission. And that doesn’t even consider the fact that as a young very healthy male he was at lower risk from Covid, higher risk from the vaccine, and was willing to get tested before coming into contact with other players.

People need to wake up and stop slow rolling the realty. The knowledgable people that understood the data that were attacking him anyway are terrible human beings with totalitarian tendencies masquerading as the good guys.

[Jeff P]

Study: With each Covid vaccination, healthcare workers get sicker – applying for progressively more leave and taking more analgesic medication after each dose:
https://www.eugyppius.com/p/study-wi...id-vaccination

Here’s the chart of average sick days for each dose …





… and here’s the percentage of healthcare workers claiming some amount of sick leave for each dose:





Overall, the boosters resulted in 27.9% of the entire sample taking at least one day off of work. Of 21 participants who received AstraZeneca for their first dose, fully 11, or 52%, landed on sick leave. Moderna was also clearly worse than the BioNTech-determined average, sending 106 of 255, or 46%, of participants who received it as their third dose home for recovery.

The broader subset of healthcare workers who took medication to relieve post-vaccination symptoms paints the same picture. By the third dose, the vast majority of everyone in the sample (86%) were taking drugs to relieve the acute symptoms of the jabs:




The gender breakdown is interesting: Males were less likely to take medication after the first and second doses (16.6% vs. 24% and 31.5% vs. 49.6% respectively), but by the third dose this gender difference disappeared. Men were consistently less likely to take sick leave after every dose, however.

The authors conclude that “COVID-19 vaccination has a non-negligible impact on the staff availability in the health sector” and that it is likely the enhanced immune response to each subsequent jab that is responsible for the escalating symptoms. We’re looking only at acute, immediate reactions to vaccination here – not at injuries or other more serious adverse events. The results of the study are clearly confirmed by the overwhelming disinclination of the general public to accept further vaccination after the booster campaign. Even when everything goes right, the vaccines make a lot of people feel sick, and the effect grows more pervasive and more powerful with each successive jab.

Peer reviewed version of the study with the data and tables behind a paywall on the Science Direct site here:
https://www.sciencedirect.com/scienc...33350623002470


Preprint version on the medRXiv site here:
https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1...594v1.full.pdf

So German Health Care Workers were out sicker for longer after each successive dose. (With 86% taking pain meds for dose #3.)

Go Science!


-jp
.

[Jeff P]

YouTube (Short URL)

A new study published by The Lancet finds Vaccine mRNA Lipid Nano Particles (LNPs) contaminate human breast milk.

The Lancet | September 19, 2023
Biodistribution of mRNA COVID-19 vaccines in human breast milk:
https://www.thelancet.com/journals/e...366-3/fulltext

Findings

Of 13 lactating women receiving the vaccine (20 exposures), trace mRNA amounts were detected in 10 exposures up to 45 h post-vaccination. The mRNA was concentrated in the BM EVs; however, these EVs neither expressed SARS-COV-2 spike protein nor induced its expression in the HT-29 cell line. Linkage analysis suggests vaccine mRNA integrity was reduced to 12–25% in BM.

Interpretation

Our findings demonstrate that the COVID-19 vaccine mRNA is not confined to the injection site but spreads systemically and is packaged into BM EVs. However, as only trace quantities are present and a clear translational activity is absent, we believe breastfeeding post-vaccination is safe, especially 48 h after vaccination. Nevertheless, since the minimum mRNA vaccine dose to elicit an immune reaction in infants <6 months is unknown, a dialogue between a breastfeeding mother and her healthcare provider should address the benefit/risk considerations of breastfeeding in the first two days after maternal vaccination.

In the Interpretation section of the study the authors wrote COVID-19 vaccine mRNA is not confined to the injection site but spreads systemically throughout the body - and was found in the breast milk in 10 of 13 lactating women that were tested.

Weren't we told this was impossible because the LNPs remain at the injection site?

The authors did everything they could to downplay this in the Interpretation section by saying "only trace quantities are present."

But in the Findings section they wrote "Linkage analysis suggests vaccine mRNA integrity was reduced to 12–25% in BM." (BM being breast milk.)

Is mRNA reduced to 12–25% integrity in breast milk safe for infants?

Right now that's anybody's guess because it hasn't been tested.

Imo, what makes this really bad:

Pregnant and lactating women were excluded from the clinical trials.

The FDA, CDC, etc. had ABSOLUTELY NO IDEA whether or not mRNA LNPs could be passed from breastfeeding mothers to infants in breast milk because they never tested it.

And yet they pushed mRNA vaccines on pregnant women by telling them the LNPs remain at the injection site - which has since become a proven lie.

Since when has it EVER BEEN A GOOD IDEA TO PUSH AN UNTESTED medical product on pregnant women?



-jp
.

[davew]

it will be great to discover in 5 to 10 years, what organs start having an increase in cancer and earlier deaths. The demon wits are succeeding in lowering the life expectancy to help pay for their new residents.

[xtb]

The "Great Reset" is happening right now.

[PaceAdvantage]

Originally Posted by davew

it will be great to discover in 5 to 10 years, what organs start having an increase in cancer and earlier deaths. The demon wits are succeeding in lowering the life expectancy to help pay for their new residents.

WORKING AS INTENDED

[Tor Ekman]

It’s not a bug, it’s a feature

[Bustin Stones]

Like a good little lemming, I got my 3 jabs. After the initial 2, my hemoglobin count dropped. But, in time, it recovered 70%. After the third, this Jan, it dropped even more precipitously. It registered below standards. My primary physician was unmoved by my feeling that we should just give it time to recover. She had me have an upper GI to verify I wasn't losing blood through a bleeding ulcer. Of course, there was no bleeding ulcer. But, she was convinced I was losing blood somewhere.
So, I think for some us, the jab must trigger our immune system to overpower our own normal systems. I found on the net that some people are experiencing the same issues. Probably not as many as would register general health concerns. The wife has not had any issues with her blood.
For all I know, the jabs permanently damaged my systems.

[Jeff P]

This is a Follow Up to the "trace" mRNA quantities, "EVs neither expressed SARS-COV-2 spike protein", and "nor induced expression in the HT-29 cell line" comments by the authors of the study I cited in post #563 above.

A little after the 3:45 mark of the video, Dr. John Campbell talks about how the EVs (Extracellular Vesicles) act as a protective wrapper that prevents the RNA inside (RNA from the mother as nature intended it) from being broken down by digestive acids in the infant's stomach.

He goes on to talk about how RNA from the mother inside Extracellular Vesicles survives the stomach and is normally passed to the infant in the intestines - something the authors of the study I cited above do not appear to have investigated. (If they did investigate that feel free to jump in and point it out to me.)

Based on that I wondered if there might be documented evidence of vaccine mRNA not only being:

• Passed from mother to infants in breast milk.

• Cell line transcription occurring in infants.

• But also infants suffering vaccine induced spike protein adverse events as a result.

Sadly, there is.

Pfizer's PSUR#1 (Periodic Update Safety Report #1) to the EMA (European Medicines Agency) was based on data starting in January, 2021. In the footnotes, it was revealed 2 babies had suffered strokes and 3 babies had suffered neurological damage resulting from the breast milk of vaccinated mothers.



SOURCE, here:
https://drtesslawrie.substack.com/cp/137350554


A significantly larger number of cases (455 babies) for this pattern was also reported in the Booster Doses data in PSUR#3:



SOURCE, here:
https://childrenshealthdefense.eu/eu...ctation-cases/


Imo, this proves beyond any shadow of doubt unvaccinated babies can and do suffer adverse mRNA vaccine spike protein induced side effects after ingesting breast milk from their vaccinated mothers.

Worse, this has been known since early 2021.


-jp
.

[ReplayRandall]

Checking out restaurant reviews and saw a favorite of ours had 5 bad reviews in the last month. Decided to go check it out and immediately noticed a total change of staff, place looked empty and unclean, plus there was an absence of the pleasing aroma which the restaurant was so famous for....so we left.

My point is....5 people gave a bad review of a restaurant we trusted, we went and investigated, found it to be true and decided to go elsewhere.

Yet, Thousands of testimonies of a government we don't trust, saying they were injured or maimed by the jab, but adults mindlessly go back for more AND jab their kids as well??

This is insanity and must be dealt with NOW.