Trump's policy of forcibly taking migrant children from their parents

[hcap]

Originally Posted by boxcar

Explain to me, please, how More = Less. Explain to me how increasing our population doesn't put the U.S. at much greater risk on many levels. /QUOTE]Overpopulation will increase many risks.

"Human overpopulation is among the most pressing environmental issues, silently aggravating the forces behind global warming, environmental pollution, habitat loss, the sixth mass extinction, intensive farming practices and the consumption of finite natural resources, such as fresh water, arable land and fossil fuels"

It may increase immigration along our southwest someday, but at the moment the data going back to 2000 shows it has diminished by almost 5 times

Next?

[Tom]

Local news this morning reports that busloads of theses kids are heading to Rochester, NY today.

Now this is where the real outrage can begin - sending kids to NYS????
That is child abuse.

[biggestal99]

The results of "zero-tolerance" policy is in.

and the results are LOL funny.

https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/...fee/722237002/

Time served and a 10 dollar fine.

oh yes a sharp scolding "dont do it again"

That will show em.

Allan

[Track Collector]

Did not read thru all the replies in this thread, so someone may have already mentioned this.

Children will not be separated from their parents WHEN A WALL prevents them from attempting to enter the country illegally in the first place.

[chrisl]

Originally Posted by hcap

"Human overpopulation is among the most pressing environmental issues, silently aggravating the forces behind global warming, environmental pollution, habitat loss, the sixth mass extinction, intensive farming practices and the consumption of finite natural resources, such as fresh water, arable land and fossil fuels"

It may increase immigration along our southwest someday, but at the moment the data going back to 2000 shows it has diminished by almost 5 times

Next?

You should not reproduce then...Next

[boxcar]

Originally Posted by hcap

"Human overpopulation is among the most pressing environmental issues, silently aggravating the forces behind global warming, environmental pollution, habitat loss, the sixth mass extinction, intensive farming practices and the consumption of finite natural resources, such as fresh water, arable land and fossil fuels"

It may increase immigration along our southwest someday, but at the moment the data going back to 2000 shows it has diminished by almost 5 times

Next?

Prove it.

[hcap]

Prove what?

[boxcar]

Meanwhile while, Mr. Hcap, you're going about to prove your dumb assertion, there is this:

In biology or human geography, population growth is the increase in the number of individuals in a population.

Global human population growth amounts to around 83 million annually,[1] or 1.1% per year. The global population has grown from 1 billion in 1800 to 7.616 billion[2] in 2018. It is expected to keep growing, and estimates have put the total population at 8.6 billion by mid-2030, 9.8 billion by mid-2050 and 11.2 billion by 2100.[3] Many nations with rapid population growth have low standards of living, whereas many nations with low rates of population growth have high standards of living.[4]

So...how does your Open House Immigration Policy help the U.S. to protect its land, its finite resources, its environment and its economy? How does More = Less?

And I take it that you're in sharp disagreement with Slick Willy's assessment of all the dangers that attend uncontrolled, unlimited immigration?

[boxcar]

Originally Posted by hcap

Prove what?

What you wrote in your last paragraph of the post to which I responded, Humpty? Are you this dense?

[woodtoo]

What are the chances Soros is financing these poor people with no money to pay coyotes to bring them to the border? Pocket change for Soros.

[boxcar]

Originally Posted by woodtoo

What are the chances Soros is financing these poor people with no money to pay coyotes to bring them to the border? Pocket change for Soros.

I say the chances are very good. This migration is progressivism on steroids.

One of the immediate goals is to increase spending on entitlements, overload the system and to generally create havoc with a booming economy -- an economy that is thriving is anathema to libs. In short, the left was to break the system so that they can go judge shop in the courts, to circumvent statutory law, and get the courts to put a halt to the detention of all immigrants who entered the country illegally.

[hcap]

Originally Posted by boxcar

So...how does your Open House Immigration Policy help the U.S. to protect its land, its finite resources, its environment and its economy? How does More = Less?

So your saying we should break up families because it is inevitable population growth will swamp us, no matter what?

Interesting counter to the factual demonstration that has immigration along the southwest border rapidly diminishing at many times the rate of population growth.

You just don' like that the decreasing numbers defeats much of Trumps rampant paranoia about "infestation", rapists, and MS 13.

It would be cheaper and much more humane and easier to massively distribute birth control and education.

[johnhannibalsmith]

Hollywood and mass media elites probably chip in too.

[hcap]

Economic help. Helping undeveloped countries develop, slows population growth.



Of course you're right letting kids die off naturally by trauma experienced being taken away from the parents, just might do the trick too.

Man Trump is such a clever guy!

[boxcar]

Originally Posted by hcap

So your saying we should break up families because it is inevitable population growth will swamp us, no matter what?

Interesting counter to the factual demonstration that has immigration along the southwest border rapidly diminishing at many times the rate of population growth.

You just don' like that the decreasing numbers defeats much of Trumps rampant paranoia about "infestation", rapists, and MS 13.

It would be cheaper and much more humane and easier to massively distribute birth control and education.

I'm saying that we should severely restrict immigration. Period. (Of course, in this current situation, this is not migration. This is an invasion! We need to radically reform current immigration policy. There is absolutely no upside to increasing all the risks and dangers by overpopulating our own country.

And what "decreasing numbers" are you talking about? Every person we allow in, increases our population. Here's clue for you: More can never = Less.

And you still haven't answered my question: You are in disagreement with Slick Willy's assessment of all the dangers associated with unlimited immigration?