Children Face New Dangers by Leftists

[davew]

Originally Posted by hcap

I have already posted the unreliability of wikileaks

On this thread.

But you were wrong - please post a WikiLeaks document proven to be wrong

(not just some crap like 19 national security organizations all agree as reported by ABC's George Stephanopoulos...)

[classhandicapper]

Originally Posted by hcap

Which are your purported FBI documents? Why can't I FIND THE ACTUAL DOCUMENTS?

My searches only repeat the claim that there are FBI documents copied from hare-brained conspiracy sources claiming there are.

With never a document linked to?

I am not believing any of your claims here or out there in thew pizzagate whackjob echo chamber. I am not posting on this thread until the pizzagate whackjob echo chamber. HERE provides proof. Go ahead echo each other ad infinitum.

Sayonara.

The FBI documents were included in the wikileaks batch that contained the Podesta emails and the Stratfor emails.

I was able to find the same documents at an independent source, but I don't have the link readily available. No one disputed the validity of the FBI documents that elaborated on the symbols used by pedophiles to communicate with each other.

The way the mainstream attempted to discredit the symbols was to point out that other companies use similar symbols but no one is accusing them of pedophilia. Of course, those other companies don't have pictures of children with their hands taped to a table, holding large sums of money, with a price tag of $1200 on them, and other seedy pictures and and comments on their instgram accounts posted by the owners and employees. I guess that's why no one suspected anything. smh

[classhandicapper]

Wikileaks documents

https://wikileaks.org/wiki/FBI_pedophile_symbols

Full PDF

https://file.wikileaks.org/file/FBI-...le-symbols.pdf

[hcap]

Originally Posted by davew

But you were wrong - please post a WikiLeaks document proven to be wrong

(not just some crap like 19 national security organizations all agree as reported by ABC's George Stephanopoulos...)

The burden of proof is on you.
You have no evidence, no witnesses, no investigation of pizzagate


But it has been hacked. We do not know what is fake and not fake.But also that they might have been doctored.[/B]


http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-me...-or-are-they-/
Are the Clinton WikiLeaks emails doctored, or are they authentic?

"It’s not just that they came from Russian hackers in an attempt to meddle in the U.S. election.But also that they might have been doctored. "It’s possible to verify the legitimacy of some, but not all, of the emails, cybersecurity experts said. So we can’t definitively say none of the thousands of leaked emails, which came from campaign chair John Podesta's account, have been doctored.

..."I would be shocked if the emails weren't altered," said Jamie Winterton, director of strategy for Arizona State University’s Global Security Initiative, citing Russia’s long history of spreading disinformation. In massive document dumps like the Podesta email leak, the risk of encountering altered documents is heightened because it’s easy to slip them in among thousands of genuine documents, said Susan Hennessey, a Brookings Institution fellow and former lawyer for the National Security Agency.

"It is possible the WikiLeaks dump of Podesta’s emails includes forged or altered documents," Hennessey said. "With any large leak, it is wise to proceed with caution and skepticism and verify the authenticity of documents before reporting."

Arte you denying US intelligence agencies have determined Russia was behind election meddling like the Turnip did until recently??

I told you I found the same Wikilesks document purported to be attributed to the FBI.

Unfortunately for tin foil hat lovefs, the FBI knows nothing about it on the FBI actual site. Do yourself a favor and search for anything you believe about pizzagate and so called pedop[hlil "CODE WORDS"

here......

https://www.fbi.gov/@@search?Searcha...Size=20&page=1


And another analysis of pizzagate.

https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/pizzagate-conspiracy/

CLAIM..

FalseThe 'Podesta e-mails' revealed the existence of a secret society of pedophiles operating through a pizza place loosely connected to Clinton associate David Brock.

False

[hcap]

Above post was also meant for CH. Especially the search on the actual FBI site on the so-called pedophile code words..

[davew]

Originally Posted by hcap

Above post was also meant for CH. Especially the search on the actual FBI site on the so-called pedophile code words..

that search is not for internal documents, you have proved NOTHING

[hcap]

Originally Posted by davew

that search is not for internal documents, you have proved NOTHING

Bull as usual. Type in "code words pedophiles" and you will get articles about only pedophiles and cybersecurity. Below is a video with an FBI agent talking about pedophiles. A FBI MEMBER. Qualifies as an internal document.to me

Type "pizza" or hot dog - zip.

Wikileaks is yanking your chain. Not my fault youse guys fell for this idiocy hook, line ans Turnip sinker.Roger Stone is a justified target of the Mueller investigation, and even before the investigation ends, we already know agents of Russian oligarchs and the Russian gov played US citizens on social media, and manipulated wikileaks

Btw, once again absolutely no MSM fell for this crap. Why? Is it a cosmic conspiracy greater than any conspiracy ever?? Even you can't be so gullible

YouTube (Short URL)

[davew]

well, it really does not matter what FBI says, does it?

http://yournewswire.com/new-jersey-pedophile-podesta/

[woodtoo]

Originally Posted by davew

well, it really does not matter what FBI says, does it?

http://yournewswire.com/new-jersey-pedophile-podesta/

Confirmed : cheese pizza = child porn :hcap = blind mouse

[classhandicapper]

SNOPES coverage of this story was even worse than the NY Times and Washington Post. At least the NY times didn't pretend the FBI document was not authentic. Instead it pointed out that other companies have similar symbols in their logos. But as I said, of course others have similar symbols. The difference is they don't have a lot of other creepy and seedy circumstantial evidence that raises eyebrows to go along with it.

[hcap]

Originally Posted by davew

well, it really does not matter what FBI says, does it?

http://yournewswire.com/new-jersey-pedophile-podesta/

The so-called FBI documents linked to on wikishit by CH claiming secret pedophile code words are not FBI. Rather fake news.

Your link is also a fake news internet site

[hcap]

Originally Posted by classhandicapper

SNOPES coverage of this story was even worse than the NY Times and Washington Post. At least the NY times didn't pretend the FBI document was not authentic. Instead it pointed out that other companies have similar symbols in their logos. But as I said, of course others have similar symbols. The difference is they don't have a lot of other creepy and seedy circumstantial evidence that raises eyebrows to go along with it.

Snopes is only one among many wolves biting at your lunacy. So,what about absolutely nothing on the actual FBI site search engine about your bonkers cosmic conspiracy of pizzagate connecting pedophile code words

The obviously phony crap on wikileaks you claimed as true was no proof of code words found by the FBI. It was cobbled together to manipulate Trumpeteers.

None of your stuff is credible. Especially using wikileaks to prove anything

[classhandicapper]

The FBI documents were Classified documents when leaked to Wikileaks. They were unclassified to law enforcement to help law enforcement fight child pornography, child trafficking, and pedophilia. That is most likely why they are not available on a regular search through the FBI. They AREN'T PUBLIC DOCUMENTS!!!! However, not even the mainstream papers like the NY Times refuted them. They must know they are real too. So they tried to explain away the images.

The department of the FBI that supposedly put the documents together was the Cyber Division, Innocent Images National Initiative according to the documents themselves.

That division does exist (as the FBI's own website proves) and they DO investigate child pornography and related crimes.

https://www.fbi.gov/audio-repository...ative.mp3/view

The wikileaks aspect of this is not even controversial. You are wasting time barking up that tree. The wikileaks documents are real.

The controversial parts are why certain creepy photos and terms were used on instagram accounts (and have since been made private) and whether certain e-mails suggest that code was being used.

For the 100th time, I have gone through all of it. I have explained away some of it BETTER than the mainstream media did. They are idiots. They couldn't even explain it away as well as I could and they had an agenda to do so. #fvckingmorons

For example, I know what the "Hot Dog Stand in Hawaii" refers to and can prove it's most likely a harmless comment.

But some of it is extremely creepy, remains unexplained, is almost impossible to explain away, and I know which way I'd bet if you put up all the names and claims and asked me for a thumbs up or down. That doesn't get you a conviction. We aren't debating a conviction. We are debating what the truth is. OJ didn't get convicted, but we all know the truth and I have a very good idea about this too.

[davew]

Originally Posted by hcap

The so-called FBI documents linked to on wikishit by CH claiming secret pedophile code words are not FBI. Rather fake news.

Your link is also a fake news internet site

Here is another -part of USA TODAY network

https://www.northjersey.com/story/ne...say/781995001/

[classhandicapper]

Originally Posted by davew

Here is another -part of USA TODAY network

https://www.northjersey.com/story/ne...say/781995001/

That North New Jersey newspaper is part of a vast right wing conspiracy that's operating with the Russians.