Horse Racing Forum - PaceAdvantage.Com - Horse Racing Message Board

Go Back   Horse Racing Forum - PaceAdvantage.Com - Horse Racing Message Board > Thoroughbred Horse Racing Discussion > General Racing Discussion


Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
Old 01-27-2019, 09:27 PM   #1
Prioress Ply
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2017
Posts: 83
Three claims voided in the same race at the great race place

The claims of Kentan Road, Tizanillusion and Powder were voided by track stewards in the hour after Sunday's second race.

Tizanillusion won the race for fillies and mares at 5 1-2 furlongs and was claimed in a three-way shake by trainer Doug O'Neill for $32,000. She returns to John Sadler after being reported as unsound after the race, stewards said.

Powder, who finished second, was claimed for $28,000 in a five-way shake by John Martin, but will be returned to Genaro Vallejo. She was reported to have bled.

Kentan Road, who finished fourth, was claimed for $32,000 by Gary Sherlock and returns to Sadler because of unsoundness.

http://live.drf.com/nuggets/46849-sa...-claims-in-2nd

Nothing to see here folks, move along.

/s Glee Cub John
Prioress Ply is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 01-27-2019, 10:32 PM   #2
Dave Schwartz
 
Dave Schwartz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Reno, NV
Posts: 16,909
How convenient this seems.

Curious... do the claimants have an opportunity to take the horse if they want it?
Dave Schwartz is online now   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 01-27-2019, 11:12 PM   #3
taxicab
Registered User
 
taxicab's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 3,601
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dave Schwartz View Post

Curious... do the claimants have an opportunity to take the horse if they want it?
Believe so.
taxicab is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 01-28-2019, 09:32 AM   #4
Fager Fan
Veteran
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 5,222
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dave Schwartz View Post
How convenient this seems.

Curious... do the claimants have an opportunity to take the horse if they want it?
Yes. It’s completely their call to take the horse or not, else it’d be a really problematic rule.
Fager Fan is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 01-28-2019, 10:05 AM   #5
Tom
The Voice of Reason!
 
Tom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Canandaigua, New york
Posts: 112,819
So now what happens?
Does this horse go on the vet's list?
Is it banned from running for some period of time?
__________________
Who does the Racing Form Detective like in this one?
Tom is online now   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 01-28-2019, 10:26 AM   #6
Dave Schwartz
 
Dave Schwartz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Reno, NV
Posts: 16,909
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fager Fan View Post
Yes. It’s completely their call to take the horse or not, else it’d be a really problematic rule.
That seemed logical but wanted to hear it.



Thank you.
Dave Schwartz is online now   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 01-28-2019, 10:40 AM   #7
elhelmete
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 1,736
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dave Schwartz View Post
That seemed logical but wanted to hear it.



Thank you.
Wasn't always that way.
elhelmete is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 01-28-2019, 10:46 AM   #8
ZippyChippy423
Veteran
 
Join Date: Apr 2018
Posts: 188
Can someone please explain what unsound or soundness means in horses? Also how is it determined so fast ?
ZippyChippy423 is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 01-28-2019, 05:01 PM   #9
TonyK@HSH
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Posts: 498
Quote:
Originally Posted by ZippyChippy423 View Post
Can someone please explain what unsound or soundness means in horses? Also how is it determined so fast ?
Determined by the state vet on duty. Different vets can have opposing opinions on soundness or the degree of unsoundness.
TonyK@HSH is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 01-28-2019, 05:28 PM   #10
cj
@TimeformUSfigs
 
cj's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Moore, OK
Posts: 46,828
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fager Fan View Post
Yes. It’s completely their call to take the horse or not, else it’d be a really problematic rule.
Is this a change? I remember a horse kept running and winning in SoCal that was getting claimed but the vet was voiding it. The claiming trainer didn't seem to have a choice in the matter as they seemed to want the horse but couldn't have it.
cj is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 01-28-2019, 05:32 PM   #11
Saratoga_Mike
Veteran
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 9,893
From CHRB:

(b) The stewards shall void the claim and return the horse to the original owner if: (1) The horse suffers a fatality during the running of the race or dies or is euthanized before leaving the track, or (2) The racing or official veterinarian determines the horse will be placed on the Veterinarian's List as bled, unsound or lame before the horse is released to the successful claimant. (A) �Bled� is defined as the racing or official veterinarian observing a horse bleeding from one or both nostrils during or after the race, and determining that such bleeding is a direct result of exercise induced pulmonary hemorrhage. (c) The stewards shall not void the claim if, prior to the race in which the horse is claimed, the claimant elects to claim the horse regardless of whether the racing or official veterinarian determines the horse will be placed on the Veterinarian's List as unsound or lame.
Saratoga_Mike is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 01-28-2019, 07:24 PM   #12
Hambletonian
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 341
Am i reading this right?

Sadler took first and third with horses determined to be unsound?

Are they automatically put on the Vet's List in these cases?
Hambletonian is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 01-28-2019, 08:46 PM   #13
chadk66
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Posts: 5,414
it is not very common for a horse to return to the grandstand to be unsaddled and be lame enough for the track vet to see his/her lameness. I'm thinking they must be able to reject these horses while they're in the test barn or shortly after at their own barn. There must be a certain period of time post race that these horses can be assessed.
chadk66 is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 01-28-2019, 09:14 PM   #14
Saratoga_Mike
Veteran
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 9,893
Quote:
Originally Posted by chadk66 View Post
it is not very common for a horse to return to the grandstand to be unsaddled and be lame enough for the track vet to see his/her lameness. I'm thinking they must be able to reject these horses while they're in the test barn or shortly after at their own barn. There must be a certain period of time post race that these horses can be assessed.
Page 3 shows the protocol - the claimed horse is sent to the receiving barn after racing and then the examination takes place ...

http://www.chrb.ca.gov/misc_docs/voiding_of_claims.pdf
Saratoga_Mike is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 01-28-2019, 09:56 PM   #15
chadk66
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Posts: 5,414
Quote:
Originally Posted by Saratoga_Mike View Post
Page 3 shows the protocol - the claimed horse is sent to the receiving barn after racing and then the examination takes place ...

http://www.chrb.ca.gov/misc_docs/voiding_of_claims.pdf
makes sense
chadk66 is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Reply





Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

» Advertisement
» Current Polls
Wh deserves to be the favorite? (last 4 figures)
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:17 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Copyright 1999 - 2023 -- PaceAdvantage.Com -- All Rights Reserved
We are a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program
designed to provide a means for us to earn fees by linking to Amazon.com and affiliated sites.