More Hillary emails

[Show Me the Wire]

Originally Posted by Tom

This is what they do in RUSSIA. And also, as many dems are arguing today - a person has to be cleared of suspicions and innuendo through investigations.
What happened to presumed innocent?
Today 06:03 PM

[emphasis added]

Apparently Dahossdaboss wants to live under the suspicious rule of Russia, North Korea China, Venezuela for investigations.

BTW the top policos in those systems are not investigated for real crimes. HRC.

Originally Posted by Dahossdaboss

He is presumed innocent. When his lawyer is unable to answer whether or not he shares classified info in his email or on Whatsapp it creates suspicion. That’s why they are looking in to it.

Better to be safe than sorry when it comes to classified info. I’m sure you’d agree if there wasn’t a republican in office. Being partisan has never been your strong suit.

[emphasis added]

[Tom]

Originally Posted by Dahossdaboss

He is presumed innocent. When his lawyer is unable to answer whether or not he shares classified info in his email or on Whatsapp it creates suspicion. That’s why they are looking in to it.

Better to be safe than sorry when it comes to classified info. I’m sure you’d agree if there wasn’t a republican in office. Being partisan has never been your strong suit.

There is no reason to ask in the first place.
Where is the probable cause?

Like I said, RUSSIAN justice. PROVE your innocence.

I don't expect you to understand - intelligence has never been your strong suit.

[PaceAdvantage]

Originally Posted by Dahossdaboss

Being partisan has never been your strong suit.

Are you not as partisan as Tom? Of course you are.

I have YET to see you pile on hcap like you piled on ReplayRandall.

Yet BOTH kept telling us something big was coming any minute now.

You pounded RR into the ground over his Q conspiracy stuff.

But nary a word about hcap and his giant conspiracy, you know, that Trump is a Russian agent and is going to be frog marched out of the WH for a variety of crimes...obstruction...treason...you name it...he kept telling us, like RR, that it was ONLY A MATTER OF TIME.

And you have yet to call hcap out on his nonsense that has been proven 100% wrong by Mueller and his gang of merry men and women.

[Dahossdaboss]

Originally Posted by PaceAdvantage

Are you not as partisan as Tom? Of course you are.

I have YET to see you pile on hcap like you piled on ReplayRandall.

Yet BOTH kept telling us something big was coming any minute now.

You pounded RR into the ground over his Q conspiracy stuff.

But nary a word about hcap and his giant conspiracy, you know, that Trump is a Russian agent and is going to be frog marched out of the WH for a variety of crimes...obstruction...treason...you name it...he kept telling us, like RR, that it was ONLY A MATTER OF TIME.

And you have yet to call hcap out on his nonsense that has been proven 100% wrong by Mueller and his gang of merry men and women.

This was a nice touch. Especially in light of a recent conversation we had. You might be a little more twisted than I originally thought. You hide it well though. Well, most of the time.

[Dahossdaboss]

Originally Posted by Tom

There is no reason to ask in the first place.
Where is the probable cause?

Like I said, RUSSIAN justice. PROVE your innocence.

I don't expect you to understand - intelligence has never been your strong suit.

Looks like I struck a nerve. Good.

Earlier in the thread you said if Kushner broke a law, he should be indicted. Now you’re saying you’re not interested in seeing if he broke a law because there is no probable cause in your opinion.

Interesting.

[davew]

Originally Posted by Dahossdaboss

This was a nice touch. Especially in light of a recent conversation we had. You might be a little more twisted than I originally thought. You hide it well though. Well, most of the time.

I can't tell if your posts amount to 80% trash other people : 20% information relevant to thread or if it is closer to 95% : 5%.

If the investigation into HRC emails was flawed or if much more information becomes available after original investigation, why wouldn't the investigation be re-opened? Your logic would mean Bill Cosby is in jail because of an unnecessary witch hunt and should be FREE.

[Dahossdaboss]

Originally Posted by davew

I can't tell if your posts amount to 80% trash other people : 20% information relevant to thread or if it is closer to 95% : 5%.

If the investigation into HRC emails was flawed or if much more information becomes available after original investigation, why wouldn't the investigation be re-opened? Your logic would mean Bill Cosby is in jail because of an unnecessary witch hunt and should be FREE.

You start with a whine and then you attribute something to me I’ve never said.

Does that normally work for you here?

[Tom]

Originally Posted by PaceAdvantage

Are you not as partisan as Tom? Of course you are.

I disagree. I have gone after BOTH side over the years.
Have ANY of the lefty-club here EVER even dared question anything a liberal has said or done? Especially Da-whozit?

Dahoss is not left or right - he is just disagreeable.

[Tom]

Originally Posted by Dahossdaboss

Looks like I struck a nerve. Good.

Earlier in the thread you said if Kushner broke a law, he should be indicted. Now you’re saying you’re not interested in seeing if he broke a law because there is no probable cause in your opinion.

Interesting.

You have to work on your reading skills.
I specifically asked where is the probable cause?
YOu are good at ignoring most of what is said and than putting words into other people's mouths.

And as usual, YOU can't last 3 or 4 post without going childish.

[Tom]

Originally Posted by Dahossdaboss

You start with a whine and then you attribute something to me I’ve never said.

Does that normally work for you here?

It normally works for you.

[Dahossdaboss]

Originally Posted by Tom

I disagree. I have gone after BOTH side over the years.
Have ANY of the lefty-club here EVER even dared question anything a liberal has said or done? Especially Da-whozit?

Dahoss is not left or right - he is just disagreeable.

Originally Posted by Tom

You have to work on your reading skills.
I specifically asked where is the probable cause?
YOu are good at ignoring most of what is said and than putting words into other people's mouths.

And as usual, YOU can't last 3 or 4 post without going childish.

Classic Tom. Call me Da-Whozit. Hilarious by the way. Then in the very next post tell me I can’t last 3 or 4 posts without going childish. Apparently I can hold out better than you. You lasted 1 post.

[Tom]

Classic Tom. Call me Da-Whozit.

When you have multiple names here, it fits.
Then again, if you weren't banned so many times for being a total jerk, you wouldn't need more than one.

My comments were to all of you.

[Dahossdaboss]

Originally Posted by Tom

When you have multiple names here, it fits.
Then again, if you weren't banned so many times for being a total jerk, you wouldn't need more than one.

My comments were to all of you.

I’m going to be nice and just say you’ve been funnier and more clever. You’re funnier when you’re not so angry.

[davew]

Originally Posted by Dahossdaboss

You start with a whine and then you attribute something to me I’ve never said.

Does that normally work for you here?

The only thing I said about you is over 80% of your posts consist of attempting to trash other people here.

[mostpost]

Originally Posted by davew

Judicial Watch just got another batch of Hillary emails on private server that are TOP SECRET. Will Barr start an investigation, since she was never tried before for this crime....

https://www.judicialwatch.org/press-...-email-server/

You capitalized "TOP SECRET". Is that to indicate that you know that is not true? Maybe I missed it, but I did not see anywhere in the above that any of the emails were classified TOP Secret. In fact the highest classification I saw was Confidential.

What type of information is classified Confidential? Weather reports from the DMZ in Korea are or were considered Confidential. I know this because, unlike 99% of the people here, I once had a Top Secret clearance. And I worked in the classified documents section while stationed in Korea-South Korea smart ass.

You guys (and Judicial Watch) are obsessed with Hillary Clinton. Nobody else cares.