Horse Racing Forum - PaceAdvantage.Com - Horse Racing Message Board

Go Back   Horse Racing Forum - PaceAdvantage.Com - Horse Racing Message Board > Off Topic > Off Topic - General


Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
Old 01-23-2017, 01:52 PM   #1
Jess Hawsen Arown
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2016
Posts: 1,450
women-who-did-not-vote-for-Trump march

I'm more interested in the millions upon millions of women who did.
Jess Hawsen Arown is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 01-23-2017, 01:57 PM   #2
thaskalos
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 28,390
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jess Hawsen Arown
I'm more interested in the millions upon millions of women who did.
Yes...but are those women interested in YOU?
__________________
Live to play another day.
thaskalos is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 01-23-2017, 01:59 PM   #3
EasyGoer89
Charm school graduate
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Posts: 1,902
The media cost them the win. If the MSM would have talked honestly about the closeness of the race and not try and 'discourage' Trump supporters by telling you he has no chance, Hillary might have won.

If this 'million man march' took place a few days before the election and the media warned Hillary voters 'you guys are behind here' the results probably would have been different.

Msm lulled them into false sense of security and now they're mad they used the wrong strategy, they only have themselves to blame, they thought trump voters would be discouraged and believe the polls and say 'why Bother' but that's not quite how it worked.
EasyGoer89 is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 01-23-2017, 02:00 PM   #4
boxcar
Registered User
 
boxcar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 46,883
Quote:
Originally Posted by thaskalos
Yes...but are those women interested in YOU?
I'm only interested in women who are ladies. From what I'm hearing and reading, none of those attended yesterday's march.
__________________
Consistent profits can only be made on the basis of analysis that is far from obvious to the majority. - anonymous guru
boxcar is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 01-23-2017, 02:01 PM   #5
Jess Hawsen Arown
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2016
Posts: 1,450
Quote:
Originally Posted by thaskalos
Yes...but are those women interested in YOU?
Sadly, only a few hundred thousand of them.
Jess Hawsen Arown is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 01-23-2017, 02:14 PM   #6
Tom
The Voice of Reason!
 
Tom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Canandaigua, New york
Posts: 112,470
There were some pretty foul-mouthed sluts speaking over the weekend.
When did Ashley Judd become a street Ho? She sure sounded like one.

What a pig she is.

Not to worry Ashley, you are safe - no man in his right mind would grab you!

You can go home now.....if we need you, we will call you....Suuuuuuey! Suuuuuuey!
__________________
Who does the Racing Form Detective like in this one?
Tom is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 01-23-2017, 02:18 PM   #7
Grits
Registered User
 
Grits's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 7,656
Quote:
Originally Posted by boxcar
I'm only interested in women who are ladies. From what I'm hearing and reading, none of those attended yesterday's march.
This isn't true, Box. Sure there were those in attendance who are ladies. It's foolish to think not. Don't generalize.

I will add one thing I learned by watching the news telecast and youtube video. Never again will the threat of "going postal" mean a thing. If, instead, one threatens to go "Ashley Judd" on you, you'd better sure duck, take cover, or start backing up!!!

That was, indeed, some nasty stuff. I cringed at some of her words. Madonna, on the other hand, saying f*** or reference blowing up the White House, that was nothing compared to Judd.
Grits is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 01-23-2017, 02:18 PM   #8
Greyfox
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 18,962
Quote:
Originally Posted by boxcar
I'm only interested in women who are ladies. From what I'm hearing and reading, none of those attended yesterday's march.
Are you accusing Madonna and Elizabeth Warren of not being ladies?
Greyfox is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 01-23-2017, 02:25 PM   #9
Marshall Bennett
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Houston , Tx.
Posts: 9,564
My question is where so many angry women piling up the streets have been before Trump? It's as if they've been sealed and impatiently waiting till the right guy came along to stampede. And I say "stampede' almost literally.
Marshall Bennett is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 01-23-2017, 02:46 PM   #10
boxcar
Registered User
 
boxcar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 46,883
Quote:
Originally Posted by Greyfox
Are you accusing Madonna and Elizabeth Warren of not being ladies?
They resembled deranged, unhinged escapees from a mental institution.
__________________
Consistent profits can only be made on the basis of analysis that is far from obvious to the majority. - anonymous guru
boxcar is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 01-23-2017, 02:47 PM   #11
Jess Hawsen Arown
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2016
Posts: 1,450
I want to take a STRONG middle position on something that came out of THOSE women. (strong middle position??? wtf???)

Chelsea Handler showed typical pro-choice arrogance when she said:

http://www.foxnews.com/entertainment...t-anymore.html

“No one has any right to tell us what to do with our bodies. That is not okay. You get off of your religious bullsh-t soapbox. I am my own person. No man gets to tell me what I get to do with my body. No one. Not your husband, not your politician. Why would somebody I don’t know tell me what I can do?

That is of course countered by the pro-life position that she chose to create a life. There can be no, "My bad" and destroy a human being.

...and back and forth we go. Yada yada yada.

My problem is with the arrogance of both sides. Whether you like it or not, the country has been divided on this issue at 50-50 for a long time with the needle switching back and forth across the line regularly (and yes pro-choicers, there are tens of millions of women who disagree with you).

So believe as you wish. Argue your point as you wish. But talking down to those with the opposite point of view does not gain any points.
Jess Hawsen Arown is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 01-23-2017, 02:47 PM   #12
Tom
The Voice of Reason!
 
Tom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Canandaigua, New york
Posts: 112,470
I think Ashley Judd's comments pretty much describe why they were as ornery as they were.
__________________
Who does the Racing Form Detective like in this one?
Tom is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 01-23-2017, 02:59 PM   #13
Grits
Registered User
 
Grits's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 7,656
Sorry. Keep moving. You're not gonna find many that are gonna take your bait on this one. Considering your example. It's Chelsea Handler.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jess Hawsen Arown
I want to take a STRONG middle position on something that came out of THOSE women. (strong middle position??? wtf???)

Chelsea Handler showed typical pro-choice arrogance when she said:

http://www.foxnews.com/entertainment...t-anymore.html

“No one has any right to tell us what to do with our bodies. That is not okay. You get off of your religious bullsh-t soapbox. I am my own person. No man gets to tell me what I get to do with my body. No one. Not your husband, not your politician. Why would somebody I don’t know tell me what I can do?

That is of course countered by the pro-life position that she chose to create a life. There can be no, "My bad" and destroy a human being.

...and back and forth we go. Yada yada yada.

My problem is with the arrogance of both sides. Whether you like it or not, the country has been divided on this issue at 50-50 for a long time with the needle switching back and forth across the line regularly (and yes pro-choicers, there are tens of millions of women who disagree with you).

So believe as you wish. Argue your point as you wish. But talking down to those with the opposite point of view does not gain any points.
Grits is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 01-23-2017, 03:02 PM   #14
delayjf
Registered User
 
delayjf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Norfolk VA
Posts: 6,246
Just listened to Judd's speech - YIKES


Quote:
“No one has any right to tell us what to do with our bodies. That is not okay. You get off of your religious bullsh-t soapbox. I am my own person. No man gets to tell me what I get to do with my body. No one. Not your husband, not your politician. Why would somebody I don’t know tell me what I can do?
Here's a progressive idea that's ahead of its time. If its your body, your choice, then it should be your responsibility. Some guy gets you pregnant and you choose to keep the kid and he want's nothing to do with it. You get the entire tab.
delayjf is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 01-23-2017, 03:09 PM   #15
ElKabong
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Behind the Pine Curtain
Posts: 10,615
Almost all the women I saw in interviews and such, were white. Yet....

54% of white women that voted, voted for Trump. The silent majority won, the news cameras cover the losers (dogs bark, and the train rolls on). Ashley Judd has made her crude remarks (a tree fell in the woods), now it's time to move on.

https://www.nytimes.com/2016/11/10/o...what.html?_r=0
ElKabong is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Reply




Thread Tools
Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

» Advertisement
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:11 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Copyright 1999 - 2023 -- PaceAdvantage.Com -- All Rights Reserved
We are a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program
designed to provide a means for us to earn fees by linking to Amazon.com and affiliated sites.