bigfoot body found in georgia.

[equicom]

Come off it... did you see the size of that tree kangaroo? It was bigger than many species of monkeys but wasn't discovered until 3 years ago in one of the most densely populated countries on earth.

Or how about the TWENTY ONE species recently discovered in Vietnam? Not itty bitty spiders or whatever, but also large primates... specifically:

and the highest known concentration of the white-cheeked crested gibbon

See, a large primate. I'm onto you Zilly. I know you are Bigfoot and just trying to misdirect us into not noticing.

[46zilzal]

A GIBBON is not a large primate akin to the size of this SUPPOSSED big foot. Predator size, not an aboreal midget averaging about 15 pounds.

[equicom]

Never watched "The Goodies" did you?

[Tom]

There IS a GOD!

[Shenanigans]

Originally Posted by 46zilzal

There have benn thousands of intermediate and small animals found all over the place, but NO LARGE PRIMATES. You think of a LARGE TIGER were around, a LARGE MOOSE, or other LARGE primates they would go unnoticed in this over-populated world of ours?

These little animals mean absoultely nothing to this argument NOR are any of them in an area where this other one is suppossedly found. Never found so much as a jawbone from a Yeti, Yowie Yeren or Orang Pendak either...All a hoax

My undergraduate degree is IN ZOOLOGY, and these piddly bits of evidence would never hold up in a debate ON THE SUBJECT of this mythical LARGE PRIMATE.

Poor debating skill exposed for NO EVIDENCE.

Ummmmmm...... maybe you need to read this:http://environment.newscientist.com/...the-congo.html Don't try spinning this one Zillyboy.

BTW, I am an avid hiker and enjoy exploring remote, unscathed, "rarely visited by humans" forests. I have never stumbled upon remains of a bear or cougar. These animals undoubtedly die from natural causes but I have yet to find any of their remains.

[46zilzal]

Originally Posted by Shenanigans

Ummmmmm...... maybe you need to read this:http://environment.newscientist.com/...the-congo.html Don't try spinning this one Zillyboy.

BTW, I am an avid hiker and enjoy exploring remote, unscathed, "rarely visited by humans" forests. I have never stumbled upon remains of a bear or cougar. These animals undoubtedly die from natural causes but I have yet to find any of their remains.

You guys are so out of touch with reality it is frightening. There were NO NEW LARGE primate species discovered. Sadly with the announcement of this refuge, these poor giants will be the subject of hunting and all our viral and bacterial infections they are so prone to getting.

You need a GLOBAL perspective and an education

Talk to the naturalists at a reputable source like the Smithsonian where thye have samples of ALL the LARGE PRIMATES out there. They are the ones that go out to search for these and have found them all. The world is a finite place with the only large areas left alone (discovery wise for animals) are under the oceans and near the poles.....

[Shenanigans]

Originally Posted by 46zilzal

You guys are so out of touch with reality it is frightening. There were NO NEW LARGE primate species discovered. Sadly with the announcement of this refuge, these poor giants will be the subject of hunting and all our viral and bacterial infections they are so prone to getting.

You need a GLOBAL perspective and an education

Talk to the naturalists at a reputable source like the Smithsonian where thye have samples of ALL the LARGE PRIMATES out there. They are the ones that go out to search for these and have found them all. The world is a finite place with the only large areas left alone (discovery wise for animals) are under the oceans and near the poles.....

Oh, this is so funny, we knew you would spin this to your liking - now it's "no new large primate". The whole point of posting that article is to prove how wrong you are about your "global" theories. The earth isn't as small as you perceive it to be - there are still areas - non-ocean and non-pole that are still being discovered and uncovered. How do you think all of these new species are found???
It sounds like you are the one that needs a new perspective and an education. It is quite obvious your lifetime of attending college has only helped you in attaining a closed mind - not to mention a stinking, heaping mound of arrogance that seems to always have you covered up to the neck.

[Tom]

The celecant was extinct for millions of years....until we caught one.
Giant squids exist, but there is little physical evidence.

[46zilzal]

The whole topic of this article is about a MYTHOLOGICAL animal with NO typcial evidence which naturalist's would use to document it's existence: a previously UNKNOWN, for real, large primate.

Get with the program and quit some parallel baloney about the numbers of animals already documented and real as opposed to this myth. They are MUTUALLY EXCLUSIVE.

Yes, like most enlgihtened individuals, I am a lifetime student: always will be.

[Greyfox]

Confuscious say:

"New primates to be identified are probable, but we are not "yeti" able to find them."

[46zilzal]

Originally Posted by Greyfox

Confuscious say:

"New primates to be identified are probable, but we are not "yeti" able to find them."

not even PROBABLE. All living things leave similar things behind as evidence they were there: debris, extra food, evidence of a shelter, dead individuals

[Tom]

If a Yeti dies in the forrest, and no one sees him, is he really dead?

[Greyfox]

Originally Posted by 46zilzal

not even PROBABLE. All living things leave similar things behind as evidence they were there: debris, extra food, evidence of a shelter, dead individuals

There's nothing like having an open mind is there.
I didn't mean probable in the sense of probably.
The probability might be very low, but it is a probability.
We haven't found any evidence of debris, extra food, evidence of shelter, or dead individuals from UFO's either. Is there any probability that they exist?
I would say "yes," but then I don't know what service stations they fuel up at either. If we could solve that we could solve the fuel crisis.

[46zilzal]

Originally Posted by Tom

If a Yeti dies in the forrest, and no one sees him, is he really dead?

But, in that case, there would be remains to be found and if these are as widespread as LEGEND makes thme out to be (if they were a scant number they would have a very hard time keeping their numbers up), multiple samples, akin to all large primates, would be found

[Tom]

Check here......it was a joke!