Horse Racing Forum - PaceAdvantage.Com - Horse Racing Message Board

Go Back   Horse Racing Forum - PaceAdvantage.Com - Horse Racing Message Board > Thoroughbred Horse Racing Discussion > General Racing Discussion


Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
Old 06-26-2016, 10:31 PM   #46
Track Collector
Grinding at a Poker Table
 
Track Collector's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 4,902
IMO if slots would have been approved in MA 10 years ago, I could still see an active fair circuit with Northampton, Great Barrington, and Brockton.

I do see Suffolk as never getting slots, and being redeveloped sometime in the very near future because of land values.

Last edited by Track Collector; 06-26-2016 at 10:33 PM.
Track Collector is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 06-27-2016, 06:13 AM   #47
Hambletonian
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 341
not sure about that. if there were slots at Suffolk, and they didn't raise the bottoms, why would anyone want to race at Northampton for 3k, when Suffolk would probably be offer 10k or more. If they raised bottoms, the fairs alone would not be enough to keep those horses around without a permanent anchor track.

the sad thing about the fairs ending was attendance was good, and there was strong interest from the fans. it just was very hard to get horses, and there has been at many fairs a fight over racing versus other activities. It is always a little depressing when the anti racing faction of the fair board decides to put the new generic arena/building smack dab on a portion of the track when there were plenty of other places to put it, just to make sure the stake through the heart sticks.

Brockton's viability depends on the free money they are expecting. They certainly wouldn't risk having to raise the purse money themselves, and there is no way they can get horses there without providing high purses since most will be shipping from a long ways away.
Hambletonian is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 06-28-2016, 12:15 AM   #48
therussmeister
Out-of-town Jasper
 
therussmeister's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 2,364
Quote:
Originally Posted by elhelmete
Perhaps, but slots at Suffolk Downs-level tracks only lift them higher so the fall is worse.
Can't get any worse than out of business.
__________________
“If you want to outwit the devil, it is extremely important that you don't give him advanced notice."

~Alan Watts
therussmeister is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 07-21-2016, 02:44 PM   #49
Track Collector
Grinding at a Poker Table
 
Track Collector's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 4,902
Just watched live streaming video of the MA Gaming Commission meeting.

Looks like Brockton needs monies for Operational Expenses, but the Commission does not believe it has the authority to grant these funds based on their current interpretation of the laws. Another meeting is expected to take place sometime next week.

From my vantage point prospects look very dim now.
Track Collector is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 07-21-2016, 09:20 PM   #50
Pcon04
Registered User
 
Pcon04's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: s east ma
Posts: 270
pdf file

not sure if this will post.Its the presentation to the ma gaming

commision for monies to run the Brockton meet.Keep in mind the RHDF

is to be used for purses and administrative costs !!! Brockton has asked for

EVERYTHING!!!!here is an edited version as this website wouldn't upload

the full 21 pages

Pcon
Attached Files
File Type: pdf 2016-0721-brockton-rdf-request.pdf (1.29 MB, 7 views)
__________________
bet small and get it all..Sometimes!!!

Last edited by Pcon04; 07-21-2016 at 09:21 PM.
Pcon04 is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 08-10-2016, 04:51 PM   #51
elhelmete
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 1,738
Dead for 2016.

No offense, but I'm not going to weep too much for a failure to re-open a 1/2 mile track to watch slot welfare get burned up in 1:21 6f increments.

Suffolk shoulda gotten the license. It didn't and it sucks. But....
elhelmete is online now   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 08-10-2016, 04:56 PM   #52
Track Collector
Grinding at a Poker Table
 
Track Collector's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 4,902
You beat me to it. I huge disappointment from my standpoint.

http://www.bloodhorse.com/horse-raci...ans?source=rss
Track Collector is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 08-10-2016, 05:18 PM   #53
charm city whizz
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Posts: 302
Quote:
Originally Posted by Track Collector
You beat me to it. I huge disappointment from my standpoint.

http://www.bloodhorse.com/horse-raci...ans?source=rss
Brutal
charm city whizz is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 08-10-2016, 06:10 PM   #54
EMD4ME
NoPoints4ME
 
EMD4ME's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Posts: 9,854
The article also says the MGC unanimously approved Suffolk Downs' request to utilize NYRA Bets for advanced deposit wagering services.

Good for NYRA, in 1 small positive....
EMD4ME is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Reply





Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

» Advertisement
» Current Polls
Wh deserves to be the favorite? (last 4 figures)
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:03 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Copyright 1999 - 2023 -- PaceAdvantage.Com -- All Rights Reserved
We are a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program
designed to provide a means for us to earn fees by linking to Amazon.com and affiliated sites.