Horse Racing Forum - PaceAdvantage.Com - Horse Racing Message Board

Go Back   Horse Racing Forum - PaceAdvantage.Com - Horse Racing Message Board > Thoroughbred Horse Racing Discussion > General Racing Discussion


Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread
Old 09-17-2017, 08:16 PM   #1
VigorsTheGrey
Veteran
 
Join Date: Feb 2016
Posts: 4,553
Non-Parimutuel Horse Racing States

Any reasons why the following states do not have parimutuel wagering on horse racing (or maybe even tracks)...?

1. Utah
2. South Dakota
3. Kansas
4. Missouri
5. Wisconsin
6. Mississippi
7. Alabama
8. Georgia
9. South Carolina
10. North Carolina
11. Tennessee
12. Connecticut
13. Rhode Island
14. Vermont
15. New Hampshire
16. Maine
17. Alaska..?
18. Hawaii...?

A whole block of states side by side in the deep south...?
VigorsTheGrey is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 09-17-2017, 08:20 PM   #2
horses4courses
Registered User
 
horses4courses's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 14,569
Quote:
Originally Posted by VigorsTheGrey View Post
Any reasons why the following states do not have parimutuel wagering on horse racing (or maybe even tracks)...?

1. Utah
2. South Dakota
3. Kansas
4. Missouri
5. Wisconsin
6. Mississippi
7. Alabama
8. Georgia
9. South Carolina
10. North Carolina
11. Tennessee
12. Connecticut
13. Rhode Island
14. Vermont
15. New Hampshire
16. Maine
17. Alaska..?
18. Hawaii...?

A whole block of states side by side in the deep south...?
Just one.......The Bible
__________________
Want to know what's wrong with this country?
Here it is, in a nutshell: Millions of people are
pinning their hopes on a man who has every
chance of returning to the WH, assuming that
he can manage to stay out of prison. Think about it.
horses4courses is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 09-17-2017, 08:24 PM   #3
VigorsTheGrey
Veteran
 
Join Date: Feb 2016
Posts: 4,553
Quote:
Originally Posted by horses4courses View Post
Just one.......The Bible
I can understand Utah, being inhabited by Mormons...

I think you might be on to something here...I wonder if they are dry as well...
VigorsTheGrey is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 09-17-2017, 08:28 PM   #4
ronsmac
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 2,749
Quote:
Originally Posted by VigorsTheGrey View Post
Any reasons why the following states do not have parimutuel wagering on horse racing (or maybe even tracks)...?

1. Utah
2. South Dakota
3. Kansas
4. Missouri
5. Wisconsin
6. Mississippi
7. Alabama
8. Georgia
9. South Carolina
10. North Carolina
11. Tennessee
12. Connecticut
13. Rhode Island
14. Vermont
15. New Hampshire
16. Maine
17. Alaska..?
18. Hawaii...?

A whole block of states side by side in the deep south...?
Kansas , Alabama, Rhode Island, New Hampshire ,Vermont and Maine used to have tracks. A couple may still have Harness tracks but I'm not sure.
ronsmac is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 09-17-2017, 08:31 PM   #5
therussmeister
Out-of-town Jasper
 
therussmeister's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 2,364
Quote:
Originally Posted by VigorsTheGrey View Post
Any reasons why the following states do not have parimutuel wagering on horse racing (or maybe even tracks)...?

1. Utah
2. South Dakota
3. Kansas
4. Missouri
5. Wisconsin
6. Mississippi
7. Alabama
8. Georgia
9. South Carolina
10. North Carolina
11. Tennessee
12. Connecticut
13. Rhode Island
14. Vermont
15. New Hampshire
16. Maine
17. Alaska..?
18. Hawaii...?

A whole block of states side by side in the deep south...?
Some of these had thoroughbred tracks at one time: Alabama, New Hampshire, Rhode Island, and either Kansas or Missouri (don't remember which state Woodlands was in) but they failed.

Some have other forms of racing: Wisconsin has dog racing and I believe Maine has harness.

And I believe Tennessee has, or had, a law allowing racing but no one wanted to build a track there.

Utah is too religious.
__________________
“If you want to outwit the devil, it is extremely important that you don't give him advanced notice."

~Alan Watts
therussmeister is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 09-17-2017, 08:33 PM   #6
zico20
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2014
Location: st louis
Posts: 2,987
Quote:
Originally Posted by VigorsTheGrey View Post
Any reasons why the following states do not have parimutuel wagering on horse racing (or maybe even tracks)...?

1. Utah
2. South Dakota
3. Kansas
4. Missouri
5. Wisconsin
6. Mississippi
7. Alabama
8. Georgia
9. South Carolina
10. North Carolina
11. Tennessee
12. Connecticut
13. Rhode Island
14. Vermont
15. New Hampshire
16. Maine
17. Alaska..?
18. Hawaii...?

A whole block of states side by side in the deep south...?
43 states have legalized parimutuel wagering. Here is the list.

https://www.worldcasinodirectory.com...es/pari-mutuel
__________________
You will never achieve 100% if 99% is okay!
zico20 is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 09-17-2017, 08:35 PM   #7
therussmeister
Out-of-town Jasper
 
therussmeister's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 2,364
Also, I believe Connecticut has OTBs and/or ADWs.
__________________
“If you want to outwit the devil, it is extremely important that you don't give him advanced notice."

~Alan Watts
therussmeister is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 09-17-2017, 08:38 PM   #8
VigorsTheGrey
Veteran
 
Join Date: Feb 2016
Posts: 4,553
Quote:
Originally Posted by zico20 View Post
43 states have legalized parimutuel wagering. Here is the list.

https://www.worldcasinodirectory.com...es/pari-mutuel
Interesting..."That leaves only 7 states in the US who do not currently offer legal pari-mutuel wagers...

...These 7 states include: Alaska, Georgia, Hawaii, Mississippi, North Carolina, South Carolina, and Utah."
VigorsTheGrey is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 09-17-2017, 08:49 PM   #9
ronsmac
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 2,749
Quote:
Originally Posted by VigorsTheGrey View Post
Interesting..."That leaves only 7 states in the US who do not currently offer legal pari-mutuel wagers...

...These 7 states include: Alaska, Georgia, Hawaii, Mississippi, North Carolina, South Carolina, and Utah."
They've been talking about bringing horse racing to the Atlanta area for at least 5 years but it's still talk.
ronsmac is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 09-17-2017, 10:19 PM   #10
Afleet
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: Missouri
Posts: 2,190
Quote:
Originally Posted by horses4courses View Post
Just one.......The Bible
The bible has nothing to do with it. My state has the lottery, 3 riverboat casinos, but its illegal to bet on the KY derby. I have to drive out of state to bet-sucks ass and my car has a lot of miles on it. With that said I'm going to Remington for the Derby this Sunday; really looking forward to it. A pleasant 5+ hour drive one way. And some people think I have a gambling problem
Afleet is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 09-18-2017, 10:33 AM   #11
wisconsin
Registered User
 
wisconsin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Mukwonago, WI
Posts: 3,208
Quote:
Originally Posted by therussmeister View Post
Wisconsin has dog racing
All 5 tracks have closed , 4 of which have already been torn down.

There was talk of a horse track going up in Elkhorn, MacArthur Downs. Never came to be.
__________________
"I don't always frequent message boards, but when I do, I prefer PaceAdvantage."
wisconsin is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 09-18-2017, 11:09 AM   #12
Track Collector
Grinding at a Poker Table
 
Track Collector's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 4,902
Maine has 2 active commercial harness tracks, and a number of pari-mutuel wagering fairs.

South Dakota currently has 2 pari-mutuel racing "fairs" which feature a combination of thoroughbred and quarterhorse races, but there is talk they may both end racing in 2018.
Track Collector is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 09-18-2017, 12:09 PM   #13
Fred
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Knoxville
Posts: 204
Parimutuel wagering is legal in Tennessee but no tracks or off track facility. Most ADW sites will allow you to open an account and accept your wagers if you reside in TN
Fred is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 09-18-2017, 12:19 PM   #14
Appy
Registered User
 
Appy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Flint Hills
Posts: 474
"Some of these had thoroughbred tracks at one time: Alabama, New Hampshire, Rhode Island, and either Kansas or Missouri (don't remember which state Woodlands was in) but they failed."

I can only speak to Kansas. The tracks in Kansas DID NOT FAIL. The political change in state government failed the tracks by essentially creating a monopoly favoring state owned casinos while initiating taxation rates (a difference of approximately 22%) making it impossible for the tracks to operate at a profit.
There has been a bill to correct the different rates and reopen the tracks (Woodlands and Eureka) written to be submitted for vote for several years now but the governor and his crew have delayed and played politics to keep it off the floor. The new bill provides for an extended meet length for Woodlands and relegates Eureka to fair meet status. By this time general failure of the state budget has escalated to a point where other issues take precedence, so horse racing is once again in the closet. However, political control appears to be gravitating in a more moderate direction, so there is renewed hope the tracks will reopen in accordance to the new bill in the foreseeable future.
__________________
"Better to do little well than more poorly." Appy
Appy is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Old 09-18-2017, 12:56 PM   #15
betovernetcapper
Registered User
 
betovernetcapper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: ARIZONA
Posts: 2,145
Alaska is too cold much of the year for racing. It's at the end of the world and very expensive to bring anything in. Shipping horses, jockeys, hay and whatever would be very expensive for a short meeting.

As for Hawaii, are horse's part of their culture? They have a lot of rules about brining horses into Hawaii. The very few horses they seem to have are mixed breed pleasure horses. I don't know much about the state, but they don't seem to have a burning desire for a track.
__________________
The fan base demographics are not particularly positive," he said. "I guess we can either risk alienating them or letting them die off. " -Bob Evans 6/25/2007

My posts & letters & avatars & whatever reflect solely my own world view- Born in 1948 and never an I.C.E. visit
betovernetcapper is offline   Reply With Quote Reply
Reply





Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

» Advertisement
» Current Polls
Wh deserves to be the favorite? (last 4 figures)
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:12 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Copyright 1999 - 2023 -- PaceAdvantage.Com -- All Rights Reserved
We are a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program
designed to provide a means for us to earn fees by linking to Amazon.com and affiliated sites.