|
|
09-11-2016, 10:17 AM
|
#31
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: New York
Posts: 1,454
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jess Hawsen Arown
Good call. You might have me on that one. Hopefully we will not get the chance to actually compare the two. I have confidence that she would not be able to start a war to take over the world -- but what would she do to deplorable Trump supporters? A previous Democratic Party President, FDR, set up internment camps for Japanese Americans. So there is precedent for punishment of Trump Americans.
How did you like her apology? She regrets saying 50 PERCENT. I guess she meant to say 49%,
What are people thinking that actually want to elect this piece of crud?
|
Jess you are missing the point: Hillary has so much to offer the tax paying law abiding citizens like open borders so we will be less safe, further government intrusion in the form of taxes and regulations, more government scandals and most importantly a weaker military so that we can be fair to the our enemies. I can't see why anyone would NOT vote for her!! LOL LOL LOL LOL
|
|
|
09-11-2016, 12:32 PM
|
#32
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Houston , Tx.
Posts: 9,595
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Actor
Even Hitler? Hitler did not seize German in a coup d'état. He was duly elected.
You think she's worse than Hitler?
|
Hitler actually brought Germany out of depths of poverty in 1932 to the most powerful country in the world, also economically sound in a matter of a few years. Wasn't until got greedy with war and eventually running a muck that he became the symbol of evilness. I see Hillary going the opposite direction Hitler did early on, similar to Obama's path. Who knows what the future holds. It's no secret she's careless, mean, and way far left of what we need to bring the country back. Liberals would disagree, but often they disregard the obvious in lieu of their spite towards the right.
The mentality of leaders such as Hitler and Stalin 70-80 years ago are now pretty much extinct, unless you include ISIS and such who are no way as powerful.
I find it hard to compare Hitler and Hillary because of time. Hillary would have failed miserably with the task Hitler had at hand in 1932. Hitler would have failed as a politician entirely today. The fact that a comparison even exist between the two suggest Hillary is unfit and highly unliked.
Last edited by Marshall Bennett; 09-11-2016 at 12:33 PM.
|
|
|
09-11-2016, 12:42 PM
|
#33
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 14,569
|
Political Bedfellows
Trump's campaign manager, Conway, back in Feb.
(then with Cruz) said that Trump supporters were "nasty".
Now, that is pretty deplorable.
__________________
Want to know what's wrong with this country?
Here it is, in a nutshell: Millions of people are
pinning their hopes on a man who has every
chance of returning to the WH, assuming that
he can manage to stay out of prison. Think about it.
|
|
|
09-11-2016, 04:31 PM
|
#34
|
The Voice of Reason!
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Canandaigua, New york
Posts: 112,887
|
Quote:
Forget what Hillary says -any half-wit who reads your posts knows you are deplorable.
|
And as a half wit, you are confirming this?
__________________
Who does the Racing Form Detective like in this one?
|
|
|
09-11-2016, 04:33 PM
|
#35
|
The Voice of Reason!
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Canandaigua, New york
Posts: 112,887
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Actor
Even Hitler? Hitler did not seize German in a coup d'état. He was duly elected.
You think she's worse than Hitler?
|
Her story parallels Hitler's very closely.
Right down to the part where she is physically unfit, and may be some kind of junkie to get through the day.
Not to mention the hate mongering, the lying, the racism.....she would have blended in very nicely back then.
__________________
Who does the Racing Form Detective like in this one?
|
|
|
09-11-2016, 09:44 PM
|
#36
|
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Denver
Posts: 4,163
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Marshall Bennett
Hitler actually brought Germany out of depths of poverty in 1932 to the most powerful country in the world
|
Germany was the most powerful country in Europe. They were never the most powerful country in the world.
|
|
|
09-11-2016, 11:18 PM
|
#37
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 70
|
So, she’s pandering to the LGBT and I’m deplorable and irredeemable. No I’m not racist, sexist, homophobic, xenophobic, or an islamaphobe. However, the conversion therapy that she is conducting will create more hatred and less love. I knew she had Affluenza, now she has pneumonia. Maybe she should see Dr Drew; he has more time on his hands.
__________________
TBD - To Be Determined
Last edited by TBD; 09-11-2016 at 11:21 PM.
|
|
|
09-12-2016, 04:33 AM
|
#38
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Houston , Tx.
Posts: 9,595
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by HalvOnHorseracing
Germany was the most powerful country in Europe. They were never the most powerful country in the world.
|
At the beginning of the war they were. Both the Soviet and American forces were outdated and inferior, a major reason Germany was so successful early on on.
|
|
|
09-12-2016, 07:55 AM
|
#39
|
intus habes, quem poscis
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Brooklyn NY
Posts: 9,776
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Marshall Bennett
Hitler actually brought Germany out of depths of poverty in 1932 to the most powerful country in the world, also economically sound in a matter of a few years. Wasn't until got greedy with war and eventually running a muck that he became the symbol of evilness. I see Hillary going the opposite direction Hitler did early on, similar to Obama's path. Who knows what the future holds. It's no secret she's careless, mean, and way far left of what we need to bring the country back. Liberals would disagree, but often they disregard the obvious in lieu of their spite towards the right.
The mentality of leaders such as Hitler and Stalin 70-80 years ago are now pretty much extinct, unless you include ISIS and such who are no way as powerful.
I find it hard to compare Hitler and Hillary because of time. Hillary would have failed miserably with the task Hitler had at hand in 1932. Hitler would have failed as a politician entirely today. The fact that a comparison even exist between the two suggest Hillary is unfit and highly unliked.
|
Completely incorrect. Anti-Jewish laws were enacted right away in 1933. This comparison is beyond ridiculous. You are making excuses for evil.
|
|
|
09-12-2016, 11:40 AM
|
#40
|
PA Steward
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Del Boca Vista
Posts: 88,651
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by OTM Al
Completely incorrect. Anti-Jewish laws were enacted right away in 1933. This comparison is beyond ridiculous. You are making excuses for evil.
|
I agree. MB has been out there for a while...par for the course.
|
|
|
09-12-2016, 12:35 PM
|
#41
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Houston , Tx.
Posts: 9,595
|
Back up. I'm not the one who's comparing anyone to Hitler. In fact I was stating why you can't compare the two. I was only stating that as a leader Hitler did far better early on than Hillary ever could. I'm not stupid, I know he was an evil tyrant. His hatred for Jews and other minority sects is another topic. No one here brought anti-semitism into the thread till Al came along. Mike will agree with about anyone who disagrees with me here about most anything. He simply hopped on Al's wagon.
|
|
|
09-12-2016, 12:48 PM
|
#42
|
PA Steward
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Del Boca Vista
Posts: 88,651
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Marshall Bennett
Back up. I'm not the one who's comparing anyone to Hitler. In fact I was stating why you can't compare the two. I was only stating that as a leader Hitler did far better early on than Hillary ever could. I'm not stupid, I know he was an evil tyrant. His hatred for Jews and other minority sects is another topic. No one here brought anti-semitism into the thread till Al came along. Mike will agree with about anyone who disagrees with me here about most anything. He simply hopped on Al's wagon.
|
His hatred for Jews and others was the EXACT way he was able to whip up the masses to enable his plan into motion. It was an integral part of his "success" as you deem it, not a side issue.
|
|
|
09-12-2016, 12:49 PM
|
#43
|
intus habes, quem poscis
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Brooklyn NY
Posts: 9,776
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Marshall Bennett
Back up. I'm not the one who's comparing anyone to Hitler. In fact I was stating why you can't compare the two. I was only stating that as a leader Hitler did far better early on than Hillary ever could. I'm not stupid, I know he was an evil tyrant. His hatred for Jews and other minority sects is another topic. No one here brought anti-semitism into the thread till Al came along. Mike will agree with about anyone who disagrees with me here about most anything. He simply hopped on Al's wagon.
|
"[He] did far better early on than Hillary ever could."
That's you
"Wasn't until got greedy with war and eventually running a muck that he became the symbol of evilness."
That's also you
You are making excuses for evil. The fact that you even wrote something like this shows a complete lack of understanding about how evil rises to power. It never comes full fledged and fully realized. You are also touting how he made Germany an economic power while completely ignoring how it was done. Then you close by saying the fact that there is a comparison shows how bad Mrs. Clinton is, totally contradicting the part where you say there shouldn't be a comparison, the premise of which was that she was so evil. So on top of your praise of one of the worst episodes in human history, you aren't even internally consistent in your statement.
|
|
|
09-12-2016, 01:01 PM
|
#44
|
Buckle Up
Join Date: Apr 2014
Posts: 10,614
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by OTM Al
"[He] did far better early on than Hillary ever could."
That's you
"Wasn't until got greedy with war and eventually running a muck that he became the symbol of evilness."
That's also you
You are making excuses for evil. The fact that you even wrote something like this shows a complete lack of understanding about how evil rises to power. It never comes full fledged and fully realized. You are also touting how he made Germany an economic power while completely ignoring how it was done. Then you close by saying the fact that there is a comparison shows how bad Mrs. Clinton is, totally contradicting the part where you say there shouldn't be a comparison, the premise of which was that she was so evil. So on top of your praise of one of the worst episodes in human history, you aren't even internally consistent in your statement.
|
I agree with your points Al, but in the context of MB answering Actor's question, I see MB comments in a different perspective than you're seeing it. You might want to go back and see Actor's original post and read from there, you'll see MB's comments a bit differently and not so harsh...
|
|
|
09-12-2016, 01:17 PM
|
#45
|
intus habes, quem poscis
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Brooklyn NY
Posts: 9,776
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by ReplayRandall
I agree with your points Al, but in the context of MB answering Actor's question, I see MB comments in a different perspective than you're seeing it. You might want to go back and see Actor's original post and read from there, you'll see MB's comments a bit differently and not so harsh...
|
I did look at that, but still see as the biggest problem here a complete lack of understanding of the history of the events and thus a very foolish answer. To think that that mentality does not exist today and that such a person could never be elected simply ignores how it happened. It can certainly still happen and people clearly still think that way. I'm not going any further than to say some of the things that I have seen and heard this election cycle are nothing short of horrifying in that historical perspective.
|
|
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|